Search

Notices

"Earnings Live"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2018, 06:38 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by Skyw
Maybe that’s why United wants to buy Expressjet? Bring all the pilots to mainline and merge the seniority list...that way, there’s no restriction on scope and United can add unlimited 50-110 seat jets.
Did you fail an interview at a legacy?

Were you the Skywest guy who was on his phone during the sims and lost his job?

Are you stuck at a regional for a DUI?

Did you fail a checkride?

I mean because CLEARLY, based on your scope opinions, you want to stay wherever it is you are.
terminal is offline  
Old 01-25-2018, 06:46 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,293
Default

Pretty sure he's Expressjet, probably just a troll either way.
trip is offline  
Old 01-25-2018, 07:45 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by trip
Pretty sure he's Expressjet, probably just a troll either way.
A troll who doesn’t understand the effects of scope.
terminal is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 07:02 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Skyw
Maybe that’s why United wants to buy Expressjet? Bring all the pilots to mainline and merge the seniority list...that way, there’s no restriction on scope and United can add unlimited 50-110 seat jets.
United can do that now if we wanted. No need to buy anyone. There is no restriction on scope for us. You have no protection of your job. The only reason you have a job at skyw or whatever ** regional you work at is cause you have to work for pennies on the dollar. You are made to compete for that next contract award with all the rest of the * regionals. If United pilots wanted to, we could go to the company ask to fly your RJ for crap wages and compete against you and your ****hole company. Many of us have already been there done that and have the T-shirt. Btw, thanks for working so hard, part of the money you are not earning, cause your wage sucks, is going to my profit sharing. I might buy a jet ski with it this year.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 01-26-2018 at 10:31 AM. Reason: TOU
sleeves is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 08:41 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 269
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
United can do that now if we wanted. No need to buy anyone. There is no restriction on scope for us. You have no protection of your job. The only reason you have a job at skyw or whatever sh*thole regional you work at is cause you have to work for pennies on the dollar. You are made to compete for that next contract award with all the rest of the * regionals. If United pilots wanted to, we could go to the company ask to fly your RJ for crap wages and compete against you and your * company. Many of us have already been there done that and have the T-shirt. Btw, thanks for working so hard, part of the money you are not earning, cause your wage sucks, is going to my profit sharing. I might buy a jet ski with it this year.
You're letting this tool get under your skin way too much. Just be happy you're where you are. He/she is obviously miserable and just trying to throw some shade on people who work for a place they'll never be able to get hired at.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 01-26-2018 at 10:32 AM. Reason: Quote
McNugent is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 08:48 AM
  #116  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 293
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Find a $20 all-in airline ticket on Frontier or Spirit and then post the information here for us to verify.
Cheap Flights: $20 Deals From Frontier Airlines | Money
Chief Brody is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 09:06 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,173
Default

There are far more factors in the RJ conundrum than simple pilot pay, # of seats, and fuel economy.

Limited runway slot constrained airports, gate space just to name a few. Doesn't matter who flies a 76 seat RJ if you don't have the runway space to takeoff/land, or a gate to park it at. EWR gate space is ridiculous, SFO and LAX have been at capacity for a number of years.

Larger planes, less frequency is the only solution until more infrastructure can be made. Long term problems, long term solutions must be found.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 09:08 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Airbus
Posts: 505
Default

“All-in”. Nobody is arguing that F9 doesn’t sell $20 tickets, or Southwest $49. Or UA for $59 or $69 on occasion.
crflyer is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 09:30 AM
  #119  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 293
Default

Originally Posted by crflyer
“All-in”. Nobody is arguing that F9 doesn’t sell $20 tickets, or Southwest $49. Or UA for $59 or $69 on occasion.
And I never claimed it was "all - in". But I did say that F9 can make money on that $20 fare. Other airlines cannot. That is the reality the industry needs to face if it wants the legacies to survive.
Chief Brody is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 09:52 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 342
Default

If RJ's work so well, (anything under 76 seats) why don't we see stand alone airlines use them exclusively? Because, they don't work on a stand alone basis! They have to be subsidized by their MAJOR partner! Just ask ExpressJet when they tried to start an independent airline that should have been called "Aquafresh Airlines" since thats what all there planes looked like. Then go ask ACA airlines how the whole "Independence Airlines" worked out? Both tanked!! Come on guys think and be rational.
Really is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices