Search

Notices

New 767-300 coming?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2017, 06:23 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
If section 3 of the contract is the most important thing in your life then the extension is fine.
The extension (and it's retro for furlough pay) was fine with darn near 4/5 of the voting pilot group.
jsled is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 06:29 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
The extension (and it's retro for furlough pay) was fine with darn near 4/5 of the voting pilot group.
And just like everything we all get 1 vote........I don't even know why we argue over the contract or what we want, we all get 1 vote for the LEC and MEC that will negotiate and send us a contract and we only get 1 vote for said contract.

Im not mad that the extension was passed I just voted to do it different. And even if I was mad what am I going to do about it? You can rub in the win all you want it doesn't phase me at all.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 07:12 AM
  #53  
Still an FO
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 27
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Sled,

If you had to eat a turd burger before every push, but they offered you 20 bucks more per hour (let's just say $20 for arguments sake), would you vote for that too?

Just wondering... Does it have Dale’s seasoning on it? Makes a big difference.
66Vtails is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 07:21 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
davessn763's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
I dont know why does United fly its 777s domestically? does that mean its in the same category as a 737?

United can fly a 787 between SFO - TLV/CTU/KIX/PVG, IAD - PEK, DEN - NRT. guess what CANT fly any of those routes? A 787 can do EVERYTHING a 767 can do but a 767 can't do anything the 787 can do. Therefor different category of airplane.

A Q400 could fly 76 people 450 miles in the same amount of time as a 76 seat RJ. Are they the same category? The Q400 will use 50% of the fuel on those missions, but the CRJ will fly alot further in a shorter amount of time for every other mission.
Ok I’ll give up on the semantics since your comparing a narrowbody and a widebody, and a jet with a prop.

I think our company would be better off replacing our 51 767’s with 787’s rather than buying new or used 767’s. Not only would it save an enormous amount of fuel over the long run it would eliminate a fleet type which is a huge savings as well.

But most importantly we would have almost 500 more wide-body paid pilots.
davessn763 is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 09:25 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Sled,

If you had to eat a turd burger before every push, but they offered you 20 bucks more per hour (let's just say $20 for arguments sake), would you vote for that too?

Well, with the crew meals being what they are, I am already eating a turd burger AFTER push! Might as well embrace the Jackson! *grin*
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 09:28 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by davessn763
Ok I’ll give up on the semantics since your comparing a narrowbody and a widebody, and a jet with a prop.

I think our company would be better off replacing our 51 767’s with 787’s rather than buying new or used 767’s. Not only would it save an enormous amount of fuel over the long run it would eliminate a fleet type which is a huge savings as well.

But most importantly we would have almost 500 more wide-body paid pilots.
With the 757 still on the property you wouldn’t really be eliminating a fleet type. At least not in a pilot-world kind of way
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 11:56 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Sled,

If you had to eat a turd burger before every push, but they offered you 20 bucks more per hour (let's just say $20 for arguments sake), would you vote for that too?


Hold the turd burger. I know you like to reminisce about the good ol' days...like C2000. I was here then, too. I remember:

The lack of PTC. No line guarantee until you started your last trip of the month.

The lack of 5 hours per calendar day. We had 5 hours per DUTY day. Remember those 12hr 3-days? 22hr 5-days?

The 81/83hr CREDIT cap. LOL. Remember "the bank"? Where your hours over 81 were kept until next month or the month after when you were under 81 hours? Now we have awesome rates with NO credit cap. Get some baby!!

How silly is a low CREDIT cap anyway? Or ANY credit cap. That's 1950's job featherbedding right there. It's no wonder Herb Kelleher bragged about his 50% seat mile cost advantage over UAL back then. 2001 was sure ugly.

No sir, I'll take our UPA over C2000 any day. (pension loss aside). The extension was just icing on the cake, especially with the DAL $nap up.
jsled is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 02:05 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by 66Vtails
Just wondering... Does it have Dale’s seasoning on it? Makes a big difference.
Bite through the seasoning and it tastes great. Churn it in your mouth for a bit and guess what you have? Sections 1,5,11,13, and 20 have concocted a fecal gastro symphony in my mouth.
Floyd is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 02:16 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Hold the turd burger. I know you like to reminisce about the good ol' days...like C2000. I was here then, too. I remember:

The lack of PTC. No line guarantee until you started your last trip of the month.

The lack of 5 hours per calendar day. We had 5 hours per DUTY day. Remember those 12hr 3-days? 22hr 5-days?

The 81/83hr CREDIT cap. LOL. Remember "the bank"? Where your hours over 81 were kept until next month or the month after when you were under 81 hours? Now we have awesome rates with NO credit cap. Get some baby!!

How silly is a low CREDIT cap anyway? Or ANY credit cap. That's 1950's job featherbedding right there. It's no wonder Herb Kelleher bragged about his 50% seat mile cost advantage over UAL back then. 2001 was sure ugly.

No sir, I'll take our UPA over C2000 any day. (pension loss aside). The extension was just icing on the cake, especially with the DAL $nap up.
Iv had nothing but this UPA and I would have liked to have started making changes 6 months ago...... Every year I make more money than I ever had in my entire life so the extension didn't mean much to me.......

I get the learn from the past but 2300 of our pilots have no past except for this UPA. This is why we disagree and it is why we had to go to LEAP training and learn how to play nice , and how to communicate with you old folks.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 11-08-2017, 02:26 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Hold the turd burger. I know you like to reminisce about the good ol' days...like C2000. I was here then, too. I remember:

The lack of PTC. No line guarantee until you started your last trip of the month.

The lack of 5 hours per calendar day. We had 5 hours per DUTY day. Remember those 12hr 3-days? 22hr 5-days?

The 81/83hr CREDIT cap. LOL. Remember "the bank"? Where your hours over 81 were kept until next month or the month after when you were under 81 hours? Now we have awesome rates with NO credit cap. Get some baby!!

How silly is a low CREDIT cap anyway? Or ANY credit cap. That's 1950's job featherbedding right there. It's no wonder Herb Kelleher bragged about his 50% seat mile cost advantage over UAL back then. 2001 was sure ugly.

No sir, I'll take our UPA over C2000 any day. (pension loss aside). The extension was just icing on the cake, especially with the DAL $nap up.

Wadr, have your expectations have been realigned to the point where you are blinded to the benefit of contractual improvements? He's not talking about returning to C2000 but building on what we have. Talking about a cap, no ptc, etc is a red herring that serves no purpose.
Floyd is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flextodaline
Cargo
28
02-02-2014 01:48 AM
HankHill
Cargo
41
06-29-2011 12:02 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
04-09-2007 06:57 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
4
02-14-2007 07:15 AM
Low Renzo
Major
0
05-28-2005 10:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices