Search

Notices

New Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2017, 09:33 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

The age of the airline strike may also have seen it's zenith. My crystal ball is clouding with age, but right now it shows little chance of a sympathetic Labor Relations Board ever releasing the American, Delta, or United pilot group to seek self help not to mention the trend in the industry today towards keeping labor costs nearly identical across the board. I think the current thinking in the C suite tends more towards labor costs being fixed and comparable versus a whole sale desire to subvert labor as was the case in the '80s under Reagan after the PATCO strike.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 11:10 AM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
BeeWatcher's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Captain
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
The age of the airline strike may also have seen it's zenith. My crystal ball is clouding with age, but right now it shows little chance of a sympathetic Labor Relations Board ever releasing the American, Delta, or United pilot group to seek self help not to mention the trend in the industry today towards keeping labor costs nearly identical across the board. I think the current thinking in the C suite tends more towards labor costs being fixed and comparable versus a whole sale desire to subvert labor as was the case in the '80s under Reagan after the PATCO strike.
The "big four" have comparable pilot costs but the Spirits and Jetblues of the world do not. Their executive suite does not want to give up their cost advantage and thus views pilot costs as a variable cost. Their current playbook of stalling is working out quite nicely for their bottom line. I don't see things changing anytime soon...
BeeWatcher is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 12:00 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
First, I think the reality on the line today does not jibe with the comments here. For the last decade I have flown internationally in 3 and 4 man crews. I have also flown many, many flights with scabs both in IAD and now in EWR. Never, not once, has the other pilot or pilots with whom I flew evinced a sentiment that they would not be "friendly" with a scab captain even when flying with individuals whom I, myself, disliked terribly. The line pilots, especially younger line pilots, really don't care or even know who the scabs are. I, having started in ORD, have the means to know when I fly with a scab. Now this is not an argument for or against my position. That I recognize, but I put it out there merely as a fact.

The good news is in a few short years there will be no more scabs at United and my point will be moot if it isn't already moot today.
Following SOPs, reading checklists, callouts, and conducting briefings doesn't mean you're being friendly. It's what safety demands and passengers expect. I've flown with a lot of scabs. Not once have I seen someone eat with them. I don't asked about their family, their interests, shake their hand, or sign their &$@#! retirement picture.

Your "point" is never moot. There will always be a need to educate future pilots about the consequences if one chooses to scab.
Floyd is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 07:07 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
Logically what you're saying makes sense, if a company wants to lead turn an expected strike situation by half a decade or more. UA hired 62% mil last yr and from the looks of the new hire class pics the vast majority appears to be pension collecting retired mil. Why hire people who can sit and collect a paycheck if the ultimate goal is spineless picket line crossers? The argument goes both ways, if you want to be open minded about it, and ultimately there are future scabs from all backgrounds. Even the constant green slip bragging deltoids are filled with future scabs, although they will mention how cal is the scab airline, and united now by association. If you've studied it, whoever went up against Lorenzo was going to be a future scab airline. If he targeted delta, UA/cal would be talking smack about dal/nw these days. Not justifying any of it, but I educated myself on the industry history (I'm mil background), and believe whoever Lorenzo went after was doomed from the start unfortunately.
The ultimate goal isn't "spineless picketline crossers." They are hiring military guys because of the high value management puts on their vetting process. In Management's collective opinion, the military product is a "known commodity." No problems with probation, but a big trade off with guard/reserve and the effect it has on staffing (reserve).

I think Management knows the picketline in the traditional sense is gone. ALPA knows it too. It's like two armed Nuclear Nation States that both possess the launch button. Management has the lock out, and the union has the strike. Neither one wants to push the button and exercise the nuclear option.

Management's real goal is to staff the airline with competent pilots and who possess the acumen and aptitude to upgrade.

I also think that most of the military pilots value working for an airline with a strong union and a good contract. In my humble opinion, the current and former military officers we've hired have way too much honor to ever consider scabbing. I don't see an 0-6 crossing a picket line. I see him leading one.
baseball is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 07:14 PM
  #65  
Guppy reserve EWR
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
The ultimate goal isn't "spineless picketline crossers." They are hiring military guys because of the high value management puts on their vetting process. In Management's collective opinion, the military product is a "known commodity." No problems with probation, but a big trade off with guard/reserve and the effect it has on staffing (reserve).

I think Management knows the picketline in the traditional sense is gone. ALPA knows it too. It's like two armed Nuclear Nation States that both possess the launch button. Management has the lock out, and the union has the strike. Neither one wants to push the button and exercise the nuclear option.

Management's real goal is to staff the airline with competent pilots and who possess the acumen and aptitude to upgrade.

I also think that most of the military pilots value working for an airline with a strong union and a good contract. In my humble opinion, the current and former military officers we've hired have way too much honor to ever consider scabbing. I don't see an 0-6 crossing a picket line. I see him leading one.
Nicely put.
PA Slammer is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 07:16 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
The age of the airline strike may also have seen it's zenith. My crystal ball is clouding with age, but right now it shows little chance of a sympathetic Labor Relations Board ever releasing the American, Delta, or United pilot group to seek self help not to mention the trend in the industry today towards keeping labor costs nearly identical across the board. I think the current thinking in the C suite tends more towards labor costs being fixed and comparable versus a whole sale desire to subvert labor as was the case in the '80s under Reagan after the PATCO strike.
None of the major US airline's want to be the one who is "leading the negotiating cycle" so to speak. However, they all know that the give-backs and concessions are over. They do want comparable labor costs. They want them for a few reasons:
1. It translates strongly to labor stability
2. It gives confidence to the stock price
3. It helps in terms of recruitment: ie, one airline isn't getting all the best applicants because of their superior pay.
4. It allows them increased flexibility to deal with their other major costs (fuel).

Continental (under Kellner) did not want to be the airline leading the pack. That's one of the reasons they proposed to take a pass and just offer "delta plus a dollar." They figured they would squeeze that dollar back out of you somewhere else (PBS for example).
baseball is offline  
Old 10-03-2017, 05:02 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Continental (under Kellner) did not want to be the airline leading the pack. That's one of the reasons they proposed to take a pass and just offer "delta plus a dollar." They figured they would squeeze that dollar back out of you somewhere else (PBS for example).[/QUOTE]





I can't recall when CAL paid Delta plus a dollar
Can you educate me about CAL contracts?

I remember all Captains 120 per hr
and all FOs 70 so per hour till the 95or 96 contract and an average pay during their 2000s contract ( still below their competition )
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 10-03-2017, 06:50 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,900
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Jesus.......what’s the matter with you???? I’ll get over it in 10 Years when the last one retires and then be fully over it when the last one is dead and buried.
That will be March 19, 2028 to be exact.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 10-03-2017, 07:28 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
That will be March 19, 2028 to be exact.
The last one dies or retires in 2028?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 10-03-2017, 08:16 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66
I can't recall when CAL paid Delta plus a dollar
Can you educate me about CAL contracts?

I remember all Captains 120 per hr
and all FOs 70 so per hour till the 95or 96 contract and an average pay during their 2000s contract ( still below their competition )
I thought Delta + $1 was the opener after the merger. Am I remembering wrong?
Sunvox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
appDude
Cargo
14
08-08-2013 03:10 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
64
03-05-2010 02:51 PM
DLax85
Cargo
25
05-24-2008 07:27 PM
R1200RT
Cargo
36
01-09-2008 06:26 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
19
11-23-2006 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices