Search

Notices

New Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2017, 03:46 PM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Enough.

Get back to talking about Bids.
You win MOD of the Year!!!

I'm peeing in my pants I'm laughing so hard!!!
Sunvox is offline  
Old 10-14-2017, 04:10 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Enough.

Get back to talking about Bids.
I hate it when scabs bid anything using their stolen seniority. How’d I do?
awax is offline  
Old 10-14-2017, 04:25 PM
  #143  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I hate it when scabs bid anything using their stolen seniority. How’d I do?
Not so good.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_2640.JPG (49.4 KB, 373 views)
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 10-14-2017, 05:21 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Simple answer - basically, the union in place was controlled by management and scabs. The CAL guys were afraid of getting screwed if they merged with an ALPA carrier and sought to get ALPA back on property.

The CAL guys had a choice of being a scab airline fighting an ALPA carrier in case of merger or allowing the scabs into CAL ALPA. They chose the SCABS. The scabs voted for ALPA and I would assume they were allowed into whatever union CAL had before (their new)ALPA.

Simple Answer: ALPA went to CAL with the miracle lure. Promising the CAL pilots access to the ALPA tool box. The real purple elephant in the room was a likely CAL-DAL merger. Balloon went up a few times. ALPA merger and fragmentation policy was talked about. It was an important topic for the more junior CAL pilots, but not the more senior.

Scabs took over CAL ALPA due to furloughed pilots who were not on property and no longer eligible to vote following 2002 layoffs and POS CBA 02 concessions. This POS was ratified in 05.

ALPA bought the votes of the CAL scabs by promising to forgive them. It was the ALPA promise of forgiveness that secured the CAL scabs vote. Those SCABS did not care about ALPA merger policy or the alpa tool box. They only cared about being taken back into the fold.

The IACP came into being once the Ops Group was deemed ineffective at moving the ball. The Ops Group was controlled by management. This group came into being as an informal group to control and manipulate the pilots while simultaneously giving them the feeling they had input. IACP was effective in most respects, and limited in some respects. It's legislative affairs group was highly effective.

Before Ops Group there was nothing due to the void left at CAL when ALPA was decertified and beaten by Lorenzo. I would love to know the official count. How many SCABS at UAL vs. those at CAL. Just for educational purposes of course.
baseball is offline  
Old 10-14-2017, 05:41 PM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
. It was both the non-scabs and scabs that requested a certification vote to protect what was stolen. Thus, the non-scabs voted to allow the SCABS into ALPA on their shirttails.

The I’m kinda curious, why do many CAL types need to defend the action of their SCABS?
1. ALPA came crawling to the IACP begging for certification as the CAL bargaining unit. IACP was content to be independent.

2. The NON-Scabs didn't get to allow the scabs into ALPA on their shirt-tails. You voted and the votes were counted. ALPA came to the IACP and promised the SCABS to forgive them if they voted in ALPA. many NON-SCABS voted NO specifically to oppose this move by ALPA. ALPA knew it had to legally allow the scabs to vote and since they had to allow their vote per DOL/DOJ law, they found a way to appeal to them. This was largely in part to the fact they would get both the IACP war chest (9 million I think), and present and future dues moneys.

3. No one who was former CAL has ever defended the SCABS. If you were a 77-79 hire, you just ignored the scabs. If you were a Scab, then you hung out with your scab buddies and patted yourself on the back. If you were a post strike hire by CAL, you had to find a way to get along. That is until you upgraded and could do things the way you saw fit. Both the pre strike hires, and the post strike hires are all good people and have tried to make lemonade where clearly Lorenzo, McCoy, Abbot, and Starley served up sour lemons continually attempting to divide and conquer the CAL pilots by leveraging relationships within the Ops Group, IACP, and the new-ALPA.

4. There was no "hand-book" or you-tube video to watch by those attempting to put the CAL pilots back on the right track. We knew we needed a union to move the ball while trying to protect our pilots. Ops Group had limitations. IACP was getting the job done, but in the Post 9-11 environment of survival of the fittest it seemed wise for the fish to start swimming together for self protection. Hence, the logical move to join ALPA. Absent 9-11, I think ALPA would not have been successful at courting the CAL pilots. The senior would still not care, the scabs would still be self-absorbed, the junior would still be looking at fast upgrade times.

5. It's only a matter of time before the SCABS will be gone. This was my feeling and sentiment when I hired on at CAL, and it's still my sentiment today as a UAL pilot. I can't control it, so I don't worry about it. Not a factor in my daily life as a pilot.

6. This is a job, not a marriage. I don't recommend anyone harboring ill-will or hurt feelings for 40 years. You will be a bitter and ugly person both in the cockpit and outside of it. The strike wasn't my fault, and the aftermath most certainly beyond our control. The government, ALPA, and CAL management all played a part in 1983. Most assuredly, the picket-line crossers made their choice. They have to live with their dishonor.
baseball is offline  
Old 10-15-2017, 07:52 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Retired
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
1. ALPA came crawling to the IACP begging for certification as the CAL bargaining unit. IACP was content to be independent.

2. The NON-Scabs didn't get to allow the scabs into ALPA on their shirt-tails. You voted and the votes were counted. ALPA came to the IACP and promised the SCABS to forgive them if they voted in ALPA. many NON-SCABS voted NO specifically to oppose this move by ALPA. ALPA knew it had to legally allow the scabs to vote and since they had to allow their vote per DOL/DOJ law, they found a way to appeal to them. This was largely in part to the fact they would get both the IACP war chest (9 million I think), and present and future dues moneys.

3. No one who was former CAL has ever defended the SCABS. If you were a 77-79 hire, you just ignored the scabs. If you were a Scab, then you hung out with your scab buddies and patted yourself on the back. If you were a post strike hire by CAL, you had to find a way to get along. That is until you upgraded and could do things the way you saw fit. Both the pre strike hires, and the post strike hires are all good people and have tried to make lemonade where clearly Lorenzo, McCoy, Abbot, and Starley served up sour lemons continually attempting to divide and conquer the CAL pilots by leveraging relationships within the Ops Group, IACP, and the new-ALPA.

4. There was no "hand-book" or you-tube video to watch by those attempting to put the CAL pilots back on the right track. We knew we needed a union to move the ball while trying to protect our pilots. Ops Group had limitations. IACP was getting the job done, but in the Post 9-11 environment of survival of the fittest it seemed wise for the fish to start swimming together for self protection. Hence, the logical move to join ALPA. Absent 9-11, I think ALPA would not have been successful at courting the CAL pilots. The senior would still not care, the scabs would still be self-absorbed, the junior would still be looking at fast upgrade times.

5. It's only a matter of time before the SCABS will be gone. This was my feeling and sentiment when I hired on at CAL, and it's still my sentiment today as a UAL pilot. I can't control it, so I don't worry about it. Not a factor in my daily life as a pilot.

6. This is a job, not a marriage. I don't recommend anyone harboring ill-will or hurt feelings for 40 years. You will be a bitter and ugly person both in the cockpit and outside of it. The strike wasn't my fault, and the aftermath most certainly beyond our control. The government, ALPA, and CAL management all played a part in 1983. Most assuredly, the picket-line crossers made their choice. They have to live with their dishonor.
Most accurate post on the subject ever!
tailwheel48 is offline  
Old 10-15-2017, 08:45 AM
  #147  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

FAKE NEWS

History has already disputed this little slice. Impressed with your format and spelling - Bless your little heart for trying.

Last edited by AllenAllert; 10-15-2017 at 08:55 AM.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 10-15-2017, 10:39 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
4. There was no "hand-book" or you-tube video to watch by those attempting to put the CAL pilots back on the right track. We knew we needed a union to move the ball while trying to protect our pilots. Ops Group had limitations. IACP was getting the job done, but in the Post 9-11 environment of survival of the fittest it seemed wise for the fish to start swimming together for self protection. Hence, the logical move to join ALPA. Absent 9-11, I think ALPA would not have been successful at courting the CAL pilots. The senior would still not care, the scabs would still be self-absorbed, the junior would still be looking at fast upgrade times.
Originally Posted by tailwheel48
Most accurate post on the subject ever!
Um, not quite.

Althought I'm not nearly familiar enough with the internal IACP history to reasonably judge everything mentioned, it's a HUGE red flag when something as significant as this on the timeline is misrepresented.

IACP and ALPA merged prior to 9/11. (source)
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 10-15-2017, 12:14 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Um, not quite.

Althought I'm not nearly familiar enough with the internal IACP history to reasonably judge everything mentioned, it's a HUGE red flag when something as significant as this on the timeline is misrepresented.

IACP and ALPA merged prior to 9/11. (source)
It wasn't 9/11 that precipitated the merger with ALPA movement, it was the "almost" merger with Delta that got the wheels turning. The sentiment at the time was, it looked like there was going to be mergers on the horizon and it would be much better to be an ALPA carrier than a non-ALPA carrier when they happened. The rest of that post is factual as I remember it.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 10-15-2017, 12:21 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
It wasn't 9/11 that precipitated the merger with ALPA movement, it was the "almost" merger with Delta that got the wheels turning. The sentiment at the time was, it looked like there was going to be mergers on the horizon and it would be much better to be an ALPA carrier than a non-ALPA carrier when they happened. The rest of that post is factual as I remember it.
That’s certainly plausible to me.

As mentioned, I wasn’t there so I can only go on the history as shared by others.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
appDude
Cargo
14
08-08-2013 03:10 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
64
03-05-2010 02:51 PM
DLax85
Cargo
25
05-24-2008 07:27 PM
R1200RT
Cargo
36
01-09-2008 06:26 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
19
11-23-2006 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices