Search

Notices

New Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2017, 05:37 AM
  #121  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
MODS. toss me out and restrict me like last time.
..........
I was hired in 1999 am I a scab then too LOL.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 10-14-2017 at 05:51 AM. Reason: Non compos mentis in quote
Zenofzin is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 07:27 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
MODS. toss me out and restrict me like last time....
How many SCABs did we let back into the union at UAL? How many did union work? We have our own skeletons.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 10-14-2017 at 06:19 AM. Reason: Now we see the violence inherent in the system.....
tkhayes90 is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 08:51 AM
  #123  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by tkhayes90
How many SCABs did we let back into the union at UAL? How many did union work? We have our own skeletons.
You suggest that there was a whole sale cave to SCABS and allowed them to take over the Union at UAL. Obviously, you know little about either the CAL or UAL strikes and the resulting SCAB situation.

For YOU:

- Name a SCAB that heald an elected or appointed position at UAL ALPA.

- How many SCABS were allowed membership in UAL ALPA.

You asked those questions so you must know the answers.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 09:55 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
You suggest that there was a whole sale cave to SCABS and allowed them to take over the Union at UAL. Obviously, you know little about either the CAL or UAL strikes and the resulting SCAB situation.

For YOU:

- Name a SCAB that heald an elected or appointed position at UAL ALPA.

- How many SCABS were allowed membership in UAL ALPA.

You asked those questions so you must know the answers.

were the CAL scabs allowed back in when ALPA became their union again? If they were, then why?
A320 is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 10:42 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
You suggest that there was a whole sale cave to SCABS and allowed them to take over the Union at UAL. Obviously, you know little about either the CAL or UAL strikes and the resulting SCAB situation.

For YOU:

- Name a SCAB that heald an elected or appointed position at UAL ALPA.

- How many SCABS were allowed membership in UAL ALPA.

You asked those questions so you must know the answers.
Touch a nerve did I? I suggested nothing of the sort, and if you inferred that, go back to school and learn how to comprehend.

My point it is wrong to label the entire group. I'm LUAL, yes I know my history. I know that the LUAL strike was a hell of a lot shorter than the LCAL strike and we let SCABs from that very short strike back into the union. I could be wrong, but didn't Dubo have a SCAB (reformed, if there is such a thing) working for him while he was MEC Chair?
tkhayes90 is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 10:43 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by A320
were the CAL scabs allowed back in when ALPA became their union again? If they were, then why?

$$$$$$$$$$$
tkhayes90 is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 11:13 AM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by tkhayes90
Touch a nerve did I? I suggested nothing of the sort, and if you inferred that, go back to school and learn how to comprehend.

My point it is wrong to label the entire group. I'm LUAL, yes I know my history. I know that the LUAL strike was a hell of a lot shorter than the LCAL strike and we let SCABs from that very short strike back into the union. I could be wrong, but didn't Dubo have a SCAB (reformed, if there is such a thing) working for him while he was MEC Chair?
If he did, why not name the SCAB? Who labeled an entire group? The only nerve touched was your attempt to re-write the history. You seem to be grand-standing for CAL guys when they don’t need it. They probable understand their history far better than you understand the UAL history.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 11:28 AM
  #128  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by A320
were the CAL scabs allowed back in when ALPA became their union again? If they were, then why?
Simple answer - basically, the union in place was controlled by management and scabs. The CAL guys were afraid of getting screwed if they merged with an ALPA carrier and sought to get ALPA back on property.

The CAL guys had a choice of being a scab airline fighting an ALPA carrier in case of merger or allowing the scabs into CAL ALPA. They chose the SCABS. The scabs voted for ALPA and I would assume they were allowed into whatever union CAL had before (their new)ALPA.

Last edited by AllenAllert; 10-13-2017 at 11:38 AM.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 01:21 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Default

All of this is wrong. It's illegal to certify a union and not let everyone on property into said union. Scabs aren't a legal entity and there is no clause is US labor law defining them (of course, we can;t hurt their feelings at work :/ )

If the scabs were on property at the time of the election then they get to be members. Shocking that people don't understand this.
ReadyRsv is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 01:27 PM
  #130  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
MODS. toss me out and restrict me like last time...


I don't get the last part...

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 10-14-2017 at 05:56 AM. Reason: Pouring fuel on a fire
Zenofzin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
appDude
Cargo
14
08-08-2013 04:10 PM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
64
03-05-2010 03:51 PM
DLax85
Cargo
25
05-24-2008 08:27 PM
R1200RT
Cargo
36
01-09-2008 07:26 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
19
11-23-2006 10:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices