Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
C-Series still a possibility? >

C-Series still a possibility?

Search

Notices

C-Series still a possibility?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 01:13 PM
  #31  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by Half wing
The United CS300 rate is greater then Delta's by a buck or two.
Incorrect, they pay $245 we pay $242.84.

Originally Posted by Half wing
It is the CS 100 that lags a bit but it is a smaller airplane also.
Incorrect on both counts as well. A bit? I'd say $50/ hour is more than a bit and the CS-100 is configured to fly with 108-130 while our 737-700's hold 118. Both aircraft should pay exactly the same or are we back in concessionary mode to help Scott out?
757Driver is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:23 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Here's the difference if you'd care to do the math:

Delta's pay on the CS-100 is currently $245/hour. Our current book rates are $190.75, a difference of $50.25. Not sure why all you CS cheerleaders are so hyped up about this but are you not seeing the "D scale" rates we agreed to and telling me you'd prefer to be paid around $4000.00/month less because its a groovy new product?

Sorry but that's crazy talk in my book.
190.75 is incorrect. I'm showing $199.19. Also, b**** and moan all you want. We are probably going to end up with a hundred seater. So while you complain, I will work on getting the rates higher for it.
Half wing is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:25 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Incorrect, they pay $245 we pay $242.84.



Incorrect on both counts as well. A bit? I'd say $50/ hour is more than a bit and the CS-100 is configured to fly with 108-130 while our 737-700's hold 118. Both aircraft should pay exactly the same or are we back in concessionary mode to help Scott out?
Incorrect, we pay $253.58. I'd hate to see you read a performance chart. UA wouldn't configure a CS-100 with 130 seats any more than we would put 150 on a 737-700.

Last edited by Half wing; 08-23-2017 at 01:28 PM. Reason: Added last sentence
Half wing is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:27 PM
  #34  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by Half wing
190.75 is incorrect. I'm showing $199.19. Also, b**** and moan all you want. We are probably going to end up with a hundred seater. So while you complain, I will work on getting the rates higher for it.
Please do and you are correct on the rates, apologies but the CS-100 is outlandishly low. Why these ridiculously low rates were approved in the first place just reveals the ignorance of our negotiating committee. Point of this whole thing is we'd be flying 1/4 of those 737-700 airframes RIGHT NOW making industry leading rates.

PS, performance charts were never my thing and thank god for ACARS !!

Last edited by 757Driver; 08-23-2017 at 01:39 PM.
757Driver is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:29 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Here's the difference if you'd care to do the math:

Delta's pay on the CS-100 is currently $245/hour. Our current book rates are $190.75, a difference of $50.25. Not sure why all you CS cheerleaders are so hyped up about this but are you not seeing the "D scale" rates we agreed to and telling me you'd prefer to be paid around $4000.00/month less because its a groovy new product?

Sorry but that's crazy talk in my book.
The contract is what the contract is unfortunately. We use it all the time against mgmt, why on earth would they not exploit what they can against us? So is your argument to turn away an aircraft that makes us more competitive against Dal because the rates lag? Or do we take the aircraft, fill the capacity gap, start competing, and then address the pay on the next contract? Or just complain on message boards because in reality mgmt can do what they want so long as it's inline with the contract? I doubt anyone is happy the cs100 pays less than a 700 and so much less than delta, but conversely all the 787 and 764 guys are happy their banding earns them more than delta pilots. Pick your battles then...because none of those pilots would ever be in favor of removing the pay band in order to gain some cs100 rate increase. Another thing I am certain of, everyone I talk to wants mainline jobs to grow and for the airline to compete more effectively. Cs100 can satisfy both.
webecheck is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:38 PM
  #36  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
The contract is what the contract is unfortunately. We use it all the time against mgmt, why on earth would they not exploit what they can against us? So is your argument to turn away an aircraft that makes us more competitive against Dal because the rates lag? Or do we take the aircraft, fill the capacity gap, start competing, and then address the pay on the next contract? Or just complain on message boards because in reality mgmt can do what they want so long as it's inline with the contract? I doubt anyone is happy the cs100 pays less than a 700 and so much less than delta, but conversely all the 787 and 764 guys are happy their banding earns them more than delta pilots. Pick your battles then...because none of those pilots would ever be in favor of removing the pay band in order to gain some cs100 rate increase. Another thing I am certain of, everyone I talk to wants mainline jobs to grow and for the airline to compete more effectively. Cs100 can satisfy both.
Were the -700's really that bad? Delta flys ancient equipment around all day at full pay and I don't see too many of their guys complaining.

Once again the "we'll get 'em next time" crowd is all a flutter and salivating at being underpaid for the umpteenth time.
757Driver is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:48 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Were the -700's really that bad? Delta flys ancient equipment around all day at full pay and I don't see too many of their guys complaining.

Once again the "we'll get 'em next time" crowd is all a flutter and salivating at being underpaid for the umpteenth time.
Lol. There really isn't a choice to get them until the next contract anyway so what's the point of arguing it?

Delta has an order to replace their ancient equipment, just like we could do, so if we lose against them with mad dogs and 717s, imagine how bad we'd lose with 700s against their new c series.

Sorry, I don't want to be a loser because I'm wrapped up in worry about $40 difference on an airplane I won't fly while the ones I can fly(cal stuff that got banded higher than it should be) allows me the opportunity to make more than my peers at delta.

You look at things very myopically and are constantly negative.

If the company offered to pay the c series exactly what delta gets so long as we give up some dollars on the 78 and 764, do you take it?
webecheck is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 02:18 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Really Grumble? So Delta must REALLY be in the hurt locker with all their old, outdated dilapidated equipment, right? Shiny jet syndrome at its finest. You'd rather make $40/hour less flying one of these dream machines and get an extra $10 on your yearly profit sharing check then get 65, industry leading pay aircraft. Those airframes were available immediately and going to be right off the assembly line. Also do the math, 65 x 8 crews per airplane = lots of hiring.
You completely missed the point of my post, which is why I said it to begin with. You can't look past the pay rates now to see what will be competitive in 10+ years. Youre playing checkers while everyone else is playing chess.
Grumble is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 02:54 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dragon7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Pressing On
Posts: 524
Default

Doubt we will see the C series for the reasons noted previously on cost. Too many used Airbii out there to fill that niche in whatever the fleet plan becomes. But going down the C series road, in theory I agree with the concept that no FO should make More than a Captain hourly, but in the real world if those airplanes come, my read is my chances to fly it are way better than my shot at a widebody FO seat anytime soon. So will I take the $28 dollar an hour pay raise and focus on that more than the $38 pay raise I might get for the Widebody FO seat I can't hold in base. First world problems.
Then I will advocate for and support our Negotiating Committee to attempt to improve that situation somewhere in the mire of daily minimum, LTD, sick call, reserve improvements, and percentage increase, to name a few. I doubt I will get all I want, but will get some. And as a group the contract will improve. And I personally will cheer if we can bring a whole group of Express folks over to fly it and get them industry wages on our payroll.

I suspect I will be fine with however it works out. My pool doesn't judge me by my hourly rate.
Dragon7 is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 03:19 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 788
Default

Am I crazy? So, some guys are snarling about how low our C Series pay rates are. Meanwhile other guys are pooping on the C Series for being a gold plated surefire failure and way too expensive to buy. And yet, DAL has somehow figured out how to pay its CS pilots more than us while buying them for more than we think they are worth. DAL Bankruptcy ahead! "Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue"

(Disclaimer - yes I know DAL as a marquee customer got a hefty discount just like we could have had. I just think the juxtaposition of the two arguments is amusing).
CLazarus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
harlanfreedman
Hiring News
16
11-14-2016 01:42 AM
shoelu
Hangar Talk
14
11-19-2011 05:10 PM
stbloc
Regional
95
04-28-2010 09:45 AM
fireman0174
Major
5
02-19-2007 05:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices