Based in a nuclear threat zone?
#21
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
It's not about Guam, it's about a third of our bomber arsenal sitting at Anderson AFB throughout the year that is of interest to them..
#23
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
I hope Cali votes for independence first, but if an earthquake accomplishes the same thing - so be it.
#24
Addition to 1/3 of the bombers listed above, there's also US nuclear assets on the island "projecting power" in the region. And then there's a considerable fuel reserve that would allow the US to further project power and conduct operations in that region. That's the real target.
#25
Addition to 1/3 of the bombers listed above, there's also US nuclear assets on the island "projecting power" in the region. And then there's a considerable fuel reserve that would allow the US to further project power and conduct operations in that region. That's the real target.
#26
#27
N Korea seems to have forgotten about the sub and boomer fleet. Particularly those that now have conventional war head cruise missals.
#28
I wonder if "Blind Man's Bluff" was translated into Korean? That book tells the tale of US subs hanging out in the Sea of Okhotsk for the last half decade. That's pretty close to the Sea of Japan as I recall.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post