Search

Notices

Summer 2017 Pool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2017, 12:06 AM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by Sunfish FAIP
Fellas,

As I read this thread it's obvious that most everyone is either on one side of the fence (the sky is falling) or on the calm, clear & sunny side of the fence. I'm currently working on my swimming abilities as a poolie just waiting and waiting for the call to head to Denver.

What's some valid pros and cons of A: staying with my current Dallas all 737 airline, B: exercising a CJO to AA or C: continue to swim in this pool with the fear that my UA CJO will expire if we don't start BI soon ish?
Depends on your age and projected retirements at each of those airlines. Organic growth is pretty much a thing of the past so seniority will be mostly through attrition. That at least gives you a financial basis for making a comparison., but totally ignores personal preference for corporate culture at each of the choices. Some guys like hauling freight all night, others don't, etc. etc.
rp2pilot is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 03:20 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
The hiring team just had a big pow wow last week at TK, only hiring 450 for 2018.
Can you tell us anything about the source for this intel? If I remember correctly it does jibe with the last ManPower update, but just wondering where you heard it.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 04:32 AM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Can you tell us anything about the source for this intel? If I remember correctly it does jibe with the last ManPower update, but just wondering where you heard it.
Check airman meeting last week it was said by both Kirby and Paul Carlson that 450ish was the number they were planning for 2018.
EwrRocks is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 04:41 AM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by Sunfish FAIP
Fellas,

As I read this thread it's obvious that most everyone is either on one side of the fence (the sky is falling) or on the calm, clear & sunny side of the fence. I'm currently working on my swimming abilities as a poolie just waiting and waiting for the call to head to Denver.

What's some valid pros and cons of A: staying with my current Dallas all 737 airline, B: exercising a CJO to AA or C: continue to swim in this pool with the fear that my UA CJO will expire if we don't start BI soon ish?
I sent you a message if you have questions
terminal is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 06:33 AM
  #195  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
Default

I thought returnees were filling the Nov class.
sherpster is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:00 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by sherpster
I thought returnees were filling the Nov class.
The last of the pilots out don't have to come back until Fall of 2018- Fall of 2019
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:30 AM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by RSRVWINDSURFR
lets not forget the 65ish 737's he cancelled
The 65 737-700s were not cancelled. They were converted to 4 737-800s (the last of which we received this month) and 61 737-9 MAXs which all pay the higher 800/900 pay rate and increase the blended rate instead of lowering it as the 700s would have done. (This was along with converting the existing 100 737-9 MAX orders to 100 737-10 MAX)

Long term, the larger, and more efficient, MAX orders make more sense than the small, older, NGs. We just have to wait a bit longer for them.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 09:11 AM
  #198  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN
The 65 737-700s were not cancelled. They were converted to 4 737-800s (the last of which we received this month) and 61 737-9 MAXs which all pay the higher 800/900 pay rate and increase the blended rate instead of lowering it as the 700s would have done. (This was along with converting the existing 100 737-9 MAX orders to 100 737-10 MAX)

Long term, the larger, and more efficient, MAX orders make more sense than the small, older, NGs. We just have to wait a bit longer for them.
Im still not sure what the total max order is right now. I realize we SHOULD have 161 outstanding orders (100 Max 10's and the 61 converted 700NG's to Max 9's). I have seen one press release and the Boeing website indicate 135 737 Max's on order. In either case we have a significant amount of narrow bodies coming in the near future (10 Max 9's in 2018 and 24 Max 9's in 2019).

The other unknown is the schedule for the China Southern 319's. Not sure if they are still coming since that info was excluded from recent flight ops updates on future deliveries.
AV82SKI is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 10:03 AM
  #199  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Default

Another 'unknown' is what the company might be planning with regards to parking more of the older aircraft, in the coming few years.

As long as we hire 450ish, we are keeping up with retirements and keeping the training pipeline primed.
It's been quoted that K wanted more/better utilization of aircraft and crews.
So its possible to actually grow the airline without actually adding tons of planes and pilots.

I still smile when I think about people believing that we were going to have 14000-16000-18000 pilots in the coming years.

Sometimes slow & steady does win the race.

As far as summer 2018 is concerned, 8 months away. They can always get a few extra classes of 40's going in the spring that would cover any crazy growth.

Motch
horrido27 is offline  
Old 09-29-2017, 10:12 AM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27
Another 'unknown' is what the company might be planning with regards to parking more of the older aircraft, in the coming few years.

As long as we hire 450ish, we are keeping up with retirements and keeping the training pipeline primed.
It's been quoted that K wanted more/better utilization of aircraft and crews.
So its possible to actually grow the airline without actually adding tons of planes and pilots.

I still smile when I think about people believing that we were going to have 14000-16000-18000 pilots in the coming years.

Sometimes slow & steady does win the race.

As far as summer 2018 is concerned, 8 months away. They can always get a few extra classes of 40's going in the spring that would cover any crazy growth.

Motch
I'm curious to know how our aircraft / aircrew utilization compares to Delta /American / et alia.. Anybody out there know? The same idea had occurred to me that perhaps they want to up utilization rates before spending capital but I don't have any background data to draw that conclusion.
rp2pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Monte
UPS
3
11-25-2017 01:25 PM
redship
Delta
55
03-24-2016 03:02 PM
flightmedic01
United
48
03-29-2015 06:22 PM
trent890
American
24
03-13-2015 09:07 AM
mistarose
Flight Schools and Training
4
03-18-2006 12:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices