Search

Notices

New Displacement Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 11:59 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
You seem to always be spot on as it relates to staffing and displacements. If we could get some more big jets maybe we wouldn't be displacing. We'd be adding???
The extra jets don't make a difference. New routes and added block hours do. LAX-SIN and the seasonal SFO-AKL coming back will help but not enough unless the company just plans to eat the large overstaffing on the 787 West Coast.

As far as DCA 777 is concerned, even though the 787 is taking over four of their routes I think the 787 showing up on the East Coast is more about eventually replacing some of the East Coast 757 and 767 flying. The frames that were utilized on those four routes will be redistributed somewhere. Maybe out of DCA but B Models will be needed for SFO-PVG, winter SFO-HND, and SFO-LHR #2. But somewhere in all this some 756 flying will have to be replaced with other equipment or discontinued. They're pulling the frames from some domicile's flying to cover DEN 756. 756 block hours will have to decrease in one or two domiciles to accommodate.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 02:57 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 666
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
The extra jets don't make a difference. New routes and added block hours do. LAX-SIN and the seasonal SFO-AKL coming back will help but not enough unless the company just plans to eat the large overstaffing on the 787 West Coast.

As far as DCA 777 is concerned, even though the 787 is taking over four of their routes I think the 787 showing up on the East Coast is more about eventually replacing some of the East Coast 757 and 767 flying. The frames that were utilized on those four routes will be redistributed somewhere. Maybe out of DCA but B Models will be needed for SFO-PVG, winter SFO-HND, and SFO-LHR #2. But somewhere in all this some 756 flying will have to be replaced with other equipment or discontinued. They're pulling the frames from some domicile's flying to cover DEN 756. 756 block hours will have to decrease in one or two domiciles to accommodate.
Of the four planned 787 routes for DCA (CDG/LHR/PEK/GRU) only 2 come directly from the 777 (PEK and CDG). The other 2 come from the 767 (LHR#3 and GRU). The 787 has already been flying from IAD to CDG and LHR#3 this summer with LAX and SFO crews.
C11DCA is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 03:12 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
Of the four planned 787 routes for DCA (CDG/LHR/PEK/GRU) only 2 come directly from the 777 (PEK and CDG). The other 2 come from the 767 (LHR#3 and GRU). The 787 has already been flying from IAD to CDG and LHR#3 this summer with LAX and SFO crews.
True true. My mistake. I was counting those because they were former 777 routes flown by DCA at the time there were last vacancies for DCA 777. I forgot about the 787 W's.
89Pistons is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 03:32 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
Default

I'm fairly certain that Denver 756 will exist at the cost of LAX. There's a lot of HI-DEN flying in the LAX bid package, as well as DEN-EWR that doesn't make sense for LAX to fly when DEN 756 reopens.
Terrain Inop is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 09:15 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
buscappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
That^^^^^^^^.......
hmmm
in May of 85, some big union guys put on the groucho marx glasses and went to work. some non-members went on strike. more recently, i've seen guys with tie tacks and bag stickers and lanyards and all the union hoohaa acting like the biggest company men right in the middle of contract negotiations.. you don't know what you'll do till you're actually there - under the pressure
buscappy is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 09:38 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
hmmm
in May of 85, some big union guys put on the groucho marx glasses and went to work. some non-members went on strike. more recently, i've seen guys with tie tacks and bag stickers and lanyards and all the union hoohaa acting like the biggest company men right in the middle of contract negotiations.. you don't know what you'll do till you're actually there - under the pressure
F that. I'll watch my house go into foreclosure and go live under a bridge before I'll falk over my brothers. PERIOD. There ain't no excuse for being a scab. NONE.
jsled is offline  
Old 07-11-2017, 11:49 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by Yak02
Maybe it is time for a Longevity based pay system and ditch the archaic Weight based system we have had for decades. Then nobody chases airplanes and bases which destroys their QOL for money.

Also, who cares what airplanes the company buys, fly the airplane that fits your butt. The company spends the same amount of money on pilot payroll and buys the correct airplane for their mission and doesn't have to figure in the pilot Drama.

Of course, this would be a big change for ALPA and it wouldn't fit into their Pattern Bargining scheme so it will never be discussed.

Stay the Course and hold the line!
You forgot to mention the ill-conceived "National Seniority List". That sits on top of the trash heap of bad ideas.
krudawg is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 01:37 AM
  #58  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I always thought it was a great idea, as long as I started out as number one. The rest of you just politely fall in line, please..............
Probe is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 06:12 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

Originally Posted by buscappy
hmmm
in May of 85, some big union guys put on the groucho marx glasses and went to work. some non-members went on strike. more recently, i've seen guys with tie tacks and bag stickers and lanyards and all the union hoohaa acting like the biggest company men right in the middle of contract negotiations.. you don't know what you'll do till you're actually there - under the pressure
That is completely incorrect. You know what you'll do. Pins and stickers aside.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 07:39 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
buscappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
F that. I'll watch my house go into foreclosure and go live under a bridge before I'll falk over my brothers. PERIOD. There ain't no excuse for being a scab. NONE.
f what? that big union guys put on the nose glasses and flew in May of '85? good. f that. because they did.
and airhoss. whatever. history has shown that some pilots follow their own self interests- notwithstanding all their prior grandstanding. i'd peg some blowhards on this forum as the first to run to the airport for the wb captain upgrades should we ever go out on strike again. and they will really explode - now that i've said it...
buscappy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andy
United
238
06-19-2017 11:44 AM
Birddog
United
51
08-04-2014 05:24 PM
withthatsaid182
Regional
86
03-16-2009 10:28 PM
coldpilot
Regional
59
01-02-2009 09:46 AM
Luckydawg
Cargo
38
11-14-2007 05:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices