Baby Overheats on Tarmac in DEN
06-27-2017, 02:53 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Bus FO
Posts: 250
Remember that order of 60 737-700 that we were receiving this year. Those were to replace RJ's. Scott K tore up that order as his first piece of business. Because we didn't need them and he wants more RJ's. He said that the week after a paying passenger gets dragged off the plane and embarrassed every employee at United. And the flight was another RJ! Scott has to go. Our Union should come out with a vote of NO confidence. Scott make Jeff look competent. And Oscar is allowing him free reign.
06-27-2017, 03:14 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
XJT's pack Mel says no PAX above ISA+25. No clue if TSA has the same restriction. But TSA provides a more economical solution for united that's why a good amount of the XR's have been transferred to there.
06-27-2017, 06:01 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Don't give a rats furry ass. This express shyte has had its time... whatever monetary savings there was has been wiped out in brand image and lost good will.
06-27-2017, 06:08 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
JB and Swa are profitable without outsourcing their product to a B scale
06-27-2017, 06:41 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 633
Apples and oranges. Those airlines are completely different business and don't count of feed from secondary markets to fill large international aircraft.
06-27-2017, 06:58 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
It's not apples to oranges when talking about quality control by not outsourcing
06-27-2017, 07:16 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: .
Posts: 348
United should be feeding its own international markets from the secondary markets using mainline aircraft. Not outsourcing to sub contractors with no skin in the game and clearly no ability to provide a satisfactory customer experience.
06-27-2017, 07:32 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Not only do they have no skin in the game, but they continue to prove their incompetence over and over again. And it hurts United's brand...yeah I guess that management reaps what they sow, but we need to continue to fight against ANY scope relief and start bringing it back in house. This is getting out of control and will ONLY continue to get worse as the pool of applicants continues to dry up and even younger and less experienced guys fly these routes...we're already seeing some of the effects.
06-27-2017, 07:48 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 262
Gotta get rid of commutair, mesa and trans states....they’re managed so bad it’ll never work out...
06-27-2017, 08:09 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Get rid of all of them. get smaller planes in house. Yeah it would be more expensive to have the better qualified mainline pilots flying those routes, but in the long run it improves the brand, quality control, and reliability -and generates happier and loyal customers, therefore producing more revenue.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
