Search

Notices

Life as a junior NB CA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2017, 10:38 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
Personally, I preferred Red Wing clodhoppers, Osh Kosh B'gosh bib overalls, and a plaid lumberjack shirt.
Now theres a pilot I could have a beer with. Especially in Germany.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:43 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
Though i agree with your sentiment; the reason they pushed new hires starts to NOV was that the training dept is swamped. That is not an exaggeration. They need to get thru this summer firehose and they'll be able to handle the rest of the strong demand during the fall/winter. I think proper manning is when they are a bit tight during the summer and holidays. If they have to do some SRM during that time, then our staffing is fine. When they have to JRM, then you have an issue, but that has mostly gone goodbye. By the end of the summer, SRM will be basically done for the long haul. look at the trends of SRM from last year to now, and you'll see there is barely any of it left. We are finally getting staffed the right way. L-UAL, which i am, always wanted too many pilots which was ridiculous. Keep the manning tight, and it limits the number of furloughs IF WE EVER NEED THEM. Go too fat on pilots, and it's easier to cut a lot more, since the cost isn't much more. Too many L-UAL guys want more pilots and want work rules that allow more pilots on the lot. That's old school and they need to move on and realize we are not being competitive. Keep manning tight, and if we have to do some senior manning for 4 months, then we save money not being overmanned the other 8 months. And realistically, if you look at SRM numbers, it is prevalent anymore. So it's really minimum 3 months of limited SRM to offset 9 months of good staffing.
I'm particularly fond of the notion of work less and make more. If the union can negotiate effective work rules with the company then by all means bring them on. It's not our job to make the company competitive. If that was the case we'd all fly to FAR limits, eliminate what work rules we have left, and take a 50% pay cut. Sound familiar?

I'm tired of getting stuffed with 85-89 hr lines month in and out. At what point in time have we gotten so greedy that we continually choose money over quality of life? I'd gladly choose an 18 day off/80 hour line over the 15/89 option. It's better for my sanity and allows for more upgrades.
Floyd is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:49 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
I'm particularly fond of the notion of work less and make more. If the union can negotiate effective work rules with the company then by all means bring them on. It's not our job to make the company competitive. If that was the case we'd all fly to FAR limits, eliminate what work rules we have left, and take a 50% pay cut. Sound familiar?

I'm tired of getting stuffed with 85-89 hr lines month in and out. At what point in time have we gotten so greedy that we continually choose money over quality of life? I'd gladly choose an 18 day off/80 hour line over the 15/89 option. It's better for my sanity and allows for more upgrades.
I agree with you all the way however you and I are so far in the minority that ours votes don't even register. There is never enough money for pilots. Most pilots will fly tell they are just short of dead or dead. But they will have several nice cars, atleast 1 nice boat, an airplane and atleast 1 million dollar home.

I flew with a guy who needed to credit 93 hours a month to maintain his life style. The day SRM dries up he is cooked.

Give me 70-80 hours and 18+ days off a month with the option to drop down to 50 if I want.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:55 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
I'm tired of getting stuffed with 85-89 hr lines month in and out. At what point in time have we gotten so greedy that we continually choose money over quality of life? I'd gladly choose an 18 day off/80 hour line over the 15/89 option. It's better for my sanity and allows for more upgrades.
While it's not always possible to do a direct drop of a trip, there are other ways to get rid of trips by having others pick them up. By advertising a trade as both a drop and a pickup, you make things more complicated and much less likely of having it execute.

I've both dropped trips without picking up any trips and have picked up others' advertised trips without dropping my own trips. Clear your schedule by getting a drop then pick up as desired.

Depending on your fleet/seat/base/trip length, you may want to just drop one trip every other month, flipping between 89 and 70ish every other month.
Andy is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:57 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,752
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
I flew with a guy who needed to credit 93 hours a month to maintain his life style. The day SRM dries up he is cooked.

Give me 70-80 hours and 18+ days off a month with the option to drop down to 50 if I want.
TRUTH

Now, I'm a big big fan of work smarter not harder. Extract maximum pay credit for minimum time at work, make as much as you can while you can, etc.

I saw it at the Regionals, and I'm seeing it now. A guy needs to credit some number above min guaranty to sustain his lifestyle. My buddies at DAL encounter the same, guys GS'ing like crazy, buying all the crap. It's just like pre 9/11.

Sadly, when things settle down, another downturn, whatever happens and things "normalize" and min guaranty goes back to being more the norm these guys are suddenly "broke". These are the guys that will cry because now they gotta sell the Hummer, Porsche, plane, 2nd/3rd home, etc.

They're not smart enough to realize they're on an elevated borderline "inflated" level of economic opputunity.
John Carr is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:01 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Give me 70-80 hours and 18+ days off a month with the option to drop down to 50 if I want.
But you're fairly deep on reserve, aren't you? When's the last time you had a line? And doesn't the -400 closure/bumps move you further away from the G line?

Could you have a line on fifi or a guppy? Might be advantageous to bid down when your freeze ends.
Andy is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:57 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
But you're fairly deep on reserve, aren't you? When's the last time you had a line? And doesn't the -400 closure/bumps move you further away from the G line?

Could you have a line on fifi or a guppy? Might be advantageous to bid down when your freeze ends.
I am deep on reserve. Last line was 756 days. I used to bid min credit unfortunately the 756 flying wasn't that efficient so I usually had to fly more than I wanted so I tried to drop pa trip a month.

I bid the 787 to see Asia as I had never done that flying. Did plenty of Europe on the 756. So I actually plan on bidding down when my lock is up. I made sure my lifestyle could be supported on NB pay.

My problem is I hate seat locks especially with the way this company moves flying around. So I am hoping to get a bump off the 787, another 150 -400 pilots to go......
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 12:57 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
While it's not always possible to do a direct drop of a trip, there are other ways to get rid of trips by having others pick them up. By advertising a trade as both a drop and a pickup, you make things more complicated and much less likely of having it execute.

I've both dropped trips without picking up any trips and have picked up others' advertised trips without dropping my own trips. Clear your schedule by getting a drop then pick up as desired.

Depending on your fleet/seat/base/trip length, you may want to just drop one trip every other month, flipping between 89 and 70ish every other month.
My QOL should not be tied to a "trip pickup system" with arbitrary limits set by the company. Nor should my QOL should be bound by those who possess the ability of a straight pickup. If high time lines are forced upon a BES how exactly will those pickups occur when there is very little room in one's line?

Good, solid work rules will produce efficient trips and schedules. More time off in monthly awards and slightly fewer monthly hours would enable the flexibility of those who want to work as well as those who don't.

Besides, I'm sure there are a couple hundred+ fo's who have been horse whipped over the last 17 years that would appreciate work rules to generate some captain positions.
Floyd is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 02:10 PM
  #59  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
It's not our job to make the company competitive.
Yikes.
I wonder if you hear that from employees at highly successful companies in other industries.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 02:42 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
My QOL should not be tied to a "trip pickup system" with arbitrary limits set by the company. Nor should my QOL should be bound by those who possess the ability of a straight pickup. If high time lines are forced upon a BES how exactly will those pickups occur when there is very little room in one's line?
Got it. I gave you a workable solution. You're not looking for solutions; you just want to complain. How's that working out for you?
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deacon211
UPS
42
08-07-2017 09:34 AM
Harold Finch
Delta
60
11-21-2016 06:39 PM
gzsg
Delta
32
05-22-2016 04:10 PM
proskuneho
Hangar Talk
60
10-21-2008 05:23 PM
Jetset0045
Corporate
12
10-13-2008 04:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices