Search

Notices

Life as a junior NB CA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2017, 09:41 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Always Fly With Favorite Captain
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by EMBskillz
Probably the most overused airline axiom I have ever heard. The people who say this are, without exception, the biggest douche nozzles I have had the displeasure flying with. Oh that and "I fly pretty standard."

Out
Hey, I resemble that remark ! (At least the favorite Captain part.)
vroll1800 is offline  
Old 06-18-2017, 07:06 PM
  #42  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Yup. Reserves are pilots "in reserve" (!), ready to be used if needed, when needed. When they start pushing up reserve productivity there's a point where they're not reserves anymore, just lineholders scheduled week to week vs monthly.

This happened infamously at CAL in 2003 as they were cutting to the bone to stay out of another BK. A bright idea was one more round of furloughs and the reserves would just fly a lot more. Along came the Iraq war and we didn't have enough pilots for the very lucrative CRAF requests and we lost out on a money maker. Person who came up with the idea was fired.
I don't know the exact target that they plan to use reserves, but they do have a target. It is higher than you might think. There is always flying that doesn't get assigned by PBS, and pilots call in sick at a predictable rate. JR and SR manning are for when the "sheet hits the fan."

Probably the reason we stopped hiring this year, is that we had so many bodies in the wrong places, being underutilized. Forcing those bodies out through displacements will eventually have the same effect as hiring new pilots.

Or maybe they will screw it up even worse. MP is a moving target. I don't think I would want their job.
Probe is offline  
Old 06-18-2017, 08:33 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: CAP A320
Posts: 301
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I don't know the exact target that they plan to use reserves, but they do have a target. It is higher than you might think. There is always flying that doesn't get assigned by PBS, and pilots call in sick at a predictable rate. JR and SR manning are for when the "sheet hits the fan."

Probably the reason we stopped hiring this year, is that we had so many bodies in the wrong places, being underutilized. Forcing those bodies out through displacements will eventually have the same effect as hiring new pilots.

Or maybe they will screw it up even worse. MP is a moving target. I don't think I would want their job.
Though i agree with your sentiment; the reason they pushed new hires starts to NOV was that the training dept is swamped. That is not an exaggeration. They need to get thru this summer firehose and they'll be able to handle the rest of the strong demand during the fall/winter. I think proper manning is when they are a bit tight during the summer and holidays. If they have to do some SRM during that time, then our staffing is fine. When they have to JRM, then you have an issue, but that has mostly gone goodbye. By the end of the summer, SRM will be basically done for the long haul. look at the trends of SRM from last year to now, and you'll see there is barely any of it left. We are finally getting staffed the right way. L-UAL, which i am, always wanted too many pilots which was ridiculous. Keep the manning tight, and it limits the number of furloughs IF WE EVER NEED THEM. Go too fat on pilots, and it's easier to cut a lot more, since the cost isn't much more. Too many L-UAL guys want more pilots and want work rules that allow more pilots on the lot. That's old school and they need to move on and realize we are not being competitive. Keep manning tight, and if we have to do some senior manning for 4 months, then we save money not being overmanned the other 8 months. And realistically, if you look at SRM numbers, it is prevalent anymore. So it's really minimum 3 months of limited SRM to offset 9 months of good staffing.
fanaticalflyer is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 05:41 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
Though i agree with your sentiment; the reason they pushed new hires starts to NOV was that the training dept is swamped. That is not an exaggeration. They need to get thru this summer firehose and they'll be able to handle the rest of the strong demand during the fall/winter. I think proper manning is when they are a bit tight during the summer and holidays. If they have to do some SRM during that time, then our staffing is fine. When they have to JRM, then you have an issue, but that has mostly gone goodbye. By the end of the summer, SRM will be basically done for the long haul. look at the trends of SRM from last year to now, and you'll see there is barely any of it left. We are finally getting staffed the right way. L-UAL, which i am, always wanted too many pilots which was ridiculous. Keep the manning tight, and it limits the number of furloughs IF WE EVER NEED THEM. Go too fat on pilots, and it's easier to cut a lot more, since the cost isn't much more. Too many L-UAL guys want more pilots and want work rules that allow more pilots on the lot. That's old school and they need to move on and realize we are not being competitive. Keep manning tight, and if we have to do some senior manning for 4 months, then we save money not being overmanned the other 8 months. And realistically, if you look at SRM numbers, it is prevalent anymore. So it's really minimum 3 months of limited SRM to offset 9 months of good staffing.
Agree, like some other companies have been doing for a long time.
syd111 is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:55 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by EMBskillz
Probably the most overused airline axiom I have ever heard. The people who say this are, without exception, the biggest douche nozzles I have had the displeasure flying with. Oh that and "I fly pretty standard."

Out
If you can't take a joke, then you better find another profession, or at least hide your sour demeanor well in airline interviews.
rp2pilot is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:17 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by rp2pilot
If you can't take a joke, then you better find another profession, or at least hide your sour demeanor well in airline interviews.
I agree with EMBskillz observation. It's one of those things that those people say as a joke, but at the same time not really a joke. The people that use that phrase a lot tend to be more self absorbed than the average pilot, while at the same time less skilled and more afraid of the airplane.
Master of FiFi is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:54 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Usually accompanied by white New Balance shoes (Velcro optional) and the world's biggest cell phone holster.
Seriously what is it with the new balance shoes??? Why in the world are these guys wearing white new balance shoes, white tube socks, cargo shorts and a tucked in polo? Its fascinating to see how many pilots look just the same on trips. Hell I can pick out a pilot in the middle of KIX.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:59 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by Master of FiFi
I agree with EMBskillz observation. It's one of those things that those people say as a joke, but at the same time not really a joke. The people that use that phrase a lot tend to be more self absorbed than the average pilot, while at the same time less skilled and more afraid of the airplane.
Not much to be afraid of in a commercial setting.. Night carrier landings, now there's something to be afraid of . Do airplanes scare you?
rp2pilot is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:19 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Seriously what is it with the new balance shoes??? Why in the world are these guys wearing white new balance shoes, white tube socks, cargo shorts and a tucked in polo? Its fascinating to see how many pilots look just the same on trips. Hell I can pick out a pilot in the middle of KIX.
Maybe it's a Costco thing, pick up some stupid looking shoes while buying a cheap box of wine for that special occasion.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 10:22 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Seriously what is it with the new balance shoes??? Why in the world are these guys wearing white new balance shoes, white tube socks, cargo shorts and a tucked in polo? Its fascinating to see how many pilots look just the same on trips. Hell I can pick out a pilot in the middle of KIX.
That is haute couture compared to layover outfits of the past: Garage Mechanic shoes with white socks, high-water pants, and a Hawaiian shirt that would get you thrown into a volcano over there. Personally, I preferred Red Wing clodhoppers, Osh Kosh B'gosh bib overalls, and a plaid lumberjack shirt.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deacon211
UPS
42
08-07-2017 09:34 AM
Harold Finch
Delta
60
11-21-2016 06:39 PM
gzsg
Delta
32
05-22-2016 04:10 PM
proskuneho
Hangar Talk
60
10-21-2008 05:23 PM
Jetset0045
Corporate
12
10-13-2008 04:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices