Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Kirby wants bigger RJ's. >

Kirby wants bigger RJ's.

Search

Notices

Kirby wants bigger RJ's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2017, 03:55 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,752
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
Dave, given pilots history of giving up scope for $ I'm not sure he's bluffing.
Toss in HJS, heavy jet syndrome. Worked like a champ on C2000.
John Carr is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 05:03 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Fo...md80
Posts: 112
Default

We told him to go *Marlin* himself here at AA when he floated that scope idea ... it quietly went away, then he did same.
Good riddance , and good luck UAL. He is a lover of all things RJ, but can't see the writing on the wall regarding RJ staffing .
joe

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 05-29-2017 at 06:24 PM.
Marlin is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 05:50 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
Dave, given pilots history of giving up scope for $ I'm not sure he's bluffing.
I remember giving up the 70 seater while at the same time taking a BIG haircut on $ during the bankruptcy negotiations.....like a 30%+ cut....is that what you mean???
jsled is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 06:05 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RJDio's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Toss in HJS, heavy jet syndrome. Worked like a champ on C2000.
This time we have a decade and a half worth of the effects scope relaxation had on the industry. I'm sure some would be glad to try and bite the carrot off, but I imagine it's a minuscule minority.
RJDio is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 06:19 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Now we start to see the real reason the 737-700 order was cancelled.

As long as >50% of a pilot group is within 10-15 years of retiring relaxation of scope is a plausible outcome of contract negotiation as folks try to make up financial losses during the lost decade/Great Recession.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 06:27 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
Now we start to see the real reason the 737-700 order was cancelled.

As long as >50% of a pilot group is within 10-15 years of retiring relaxation of scope is a plausible outcome of contract negotiation as folks try to make up financial losses during the lost decade/Great Recession.
You have such little faith in our union. The strike in 85 was mostly about a B-scale that wouldn't have harmed 95% of the guys on property. Still happened. Most of our (UAL) scope giveaway happened in the 2003 bankruptcy contract when we lost our pension, big money, and a lot of work rules. But I guess "we gave up scope for pay" sounds better.
jsled is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 06:28 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 154
Default

How does he think he will staff these RJ's?! the regionals cant even staff the planes now let alone adding more planes. This guy is delusional!! I wouldnt worry about it, the pilot shortage on the regional level is here. Expressjet has reserve CA's flying in the right seat all the time due to lack of FO's Mesa cant fill their classes for the 175's either...Regionals should just go away and make everything mainline. It would be a total disaster if scope got relaxed.
NYGiantsFan is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 07:11 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Hopefully the vast majority of this pilot group agrees..
My main concern would be the MEC. Hopefully the vast majority of the MEC is smart enough not to let it ever get to the pilot group.
baseball is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 07:16 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by robthree

But because I flew those planes for over a decade on a different seniority list, I will enjoy only 5 years of top out pay at UAL - on whatever airframe my seniority holds - before I retire. Longevity matters. Big time. Pay rates for smaller planes are far less important than getting the pilots of those planes on our seniority list.
But you first have to get on the seniority list. Therefore, you need airframes at the mainline where that seniority list resides. We agree, essentially saying the same thing, but slightly different angle.
baseball is offline  
Old 05-29-2017, 07:24 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I remember giving up the 70 seater while at the same time taking a BIG haircut on $ during the bankruptcy negotiations.....like a 30%+ cut....is that what you mean???
Nope. I'm talking about the relaxation in scope in 2000 while getting a big pay raise... no bankruptcy gun to the head. All of those RJs, minus mainline pilots, wound up in mainline colors somehow. It's not unique to UAL, pick a carrier. The saving grace might be that those who lived through the post-9/11 contraction still remember the furloughs and backwards movement exacerbated by the outsourced flying.
XHooker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
IA1125
Regional
11
05-21-2012 08:36 AM
withthatsaid182
Regional
55
12-09-2008 04:59 PM
johnso29
Mergers and Acquisitions
19
04-14-2008 04:18 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-23-2005 12:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices