Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Kirby wants bigger RJ's. >

Kirby wants bigger RJ's.

Search

Notices

Kirby wants bigger RJ's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2017, 05:21 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Here is a short history of mainline bankruptcies in the last 15 years:

1. USAIR ALPA pilots voted yes for multiple paycuts.
2. UAL ALPA pilots voted yes for multiple paycuts.
3. DAL ALPA pilots voted yes for multiple payouts.
4. AMR APA pilots voted no. The judge at the 1113 hearing told AMR to go pack sand over cutting the pay of the pilots. A few months later, a pay RAISE was negotiated coming out of bankruptcy.

UAL pilots spent 9 years making half of what they should have. USAIR pilots spent, I can't remember, 12-14 years doing the same.

American pilots, with different union leadership, stood their ground and voted no.

I was willing to risk my job at United. Unfortunately I was outvoted by the majority who were not. The job became so bad, I voted with my feet, and left on a voluntary furlough. I have no faith in us as a group, or our union leadership, to effect a different outcome the next time the bully comes for our lunch money.
You seem to have missed that American pilots took major pay cuts after 911 while starting from a substantially lower pay rates. That's a huge omission on your part. They took the cuts and were paid far less then UAL and Delta forcing those wages lower in the 1113 process. They were the leaders in the pay cut parade following 911 and were not in the 1113 process like Delta and UAL.

Massive wage cuts imposed on American Airlines workers
By Paul Sherman
18 April 2003
Using the threat of bankruptcy as a hammer, union officials and American Airlines executives this week collaborated to push through $1.8 billion in wage cuts and other concessions on employees at the world’s largest airline. The deal reached by the unions representing pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, baggage handlers and other ground workers will cut wages between 16 and 23 percent, impose further benefit and work rule concessions and slash thousands of jobs.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 07:08 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by ItnStln
How is that a Lufthansa copy?


One seniority their express with mainline
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:23 PM
  #153  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
You seem to have missed that American pilots took major pay cuts after 911 while starting from a substantially lower pay rates. That's a huge omission on your part. They took the cuts and were paid far less then UAL and Delta forcing those wages lower in the 1113 process. They were the leaders in the pay cut parade following 911 and were not in the 1113 process like Delta and UAL.

Massive wage cuts imposed on American Airlines workers
By Paul Sherman
18 April 2003
Using the threat of bankruptcy as a hammer, union officials and American Airlines executives this week collaborated to push through $1.8 billion in wage cuts and other concessions on employees at the world’s largest airline. The deal reached by the unions representing pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, baggage handlers and other ground workers will cut wages between 16 and 23 percent, impose further benefit and work rule concessions and slash thousands of jobs.
Your facts are inaccurate. American pilots made significantly more than we did from 95-2000. We got a big contract and made more than them for 2 years. Yes, they took a haircut outside bankruptcy, but they still made significantly more than us from 2004-2012. We only made more than American pilots for 4-5 out of the 21 years I have been here.

As far as the 1113 process, they are the only pilot group to go through the 1113 process. They took it to the judge, and the judge told AMR no cuts. UAL, DAL, and USAIR pilots didn't have to guts to do that. We never completed the process. Only AMR did.
Probe is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:25 PM
  #154  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I believe PW, one of our past MEC chairman's, unilaterally gave the company scope relief for 70 seaters if my memory serves me correctly. We never voted on it.

I think he did it by side letter.
Probe is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 10:44 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I believe PW, one of our past MEC chairman's, unilaterally gave the company scope relief for 70 seaters if my memory serves me correctly. We never voted on it.

I think he did it by side letter.
Nope.

Pilots approved a bankruptcy contract that permitted 70 seaters up to a specific weight limit (i.e. CRJ700). He "saved" his pension by unilaterally approving an increase in the limit to permit the E170 thinking that he was "dealing" with the company when they realized their oversight.

The joke was on him (and then us) and the pension was not saved. But at least we had more large RJs.

Ugh.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 02:10 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 403
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Your facts are inaccurate. American pilots made significantly more than we did from 95-2000. We got a big contract and made more than them for 2 years. Yes, they took a haircut outside bankruptcy, but they still made significantly more than us from 2004-2012. We only made more than American pilots for 4-5 out of the 21 years I have been here.

As far as the 1113 process, they are the only pilot group to go through the 1113 process. They took it to the judge, and the judge told AMR no cuts. UAL, DAL, and USAIR pilots didn't have to guts to do that. We never completed the process. Only AMR did.
It's also fair to mention that AA pilots retained their pensions through this period, which is a huge cost item that every other legacy (Excluding AK?) didn't have after 2003. They held out as long as they could waiting for another Legacy to get their pensions restored. Alas, a "fake" bankruptcy allowed AA management to "freeze" their pensions ala CAL and NWA style versus terminated pension ala UAL/DAL.
Zoomie is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 02:30 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ItnStln's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,588
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66
One seniority their express with mainline
That's what I figured, thanks. That's not done by any US airline, correct?
ItnStln is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 04:52 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by Zoomie
It's also fair to mention that AA pilots retained their pensions through this period, which is a huge cost item that every other legacy (Excluding AK?) didn't have after 2003. They held out as long as they could waiting for another Legacy to get their pensions restored. Alas, a "fake" bankruptcy allowed AA management to "freeze" their pensions ala CAL and NWA style versus terminated pension ala UAL/DAL.
Their pensions were funded at a level that precluded termination even under bankruptcy laws. There was never any real threat. The pension at Delta when terminated had 5 billion in obligations verses 1 billion in assets.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 04:59 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Your facts are inaccurate. American pilots made significantly more than we did from 95-2000. We got a big contract and made more than them for 2 years. Yes, they took a haircut outside bankruptcy, but they still made significantly more than us from 2004-2012. We only made more than American pilots for 4-5 out of the 21 years I have been here.

As far as the 1113 process, they are the only pilot group to go through the 1113 process. They took it to the judge, and the judge told AMR no cuts. UAL, DAL, and USAIR pilots didn't have to guts to do that. We never completed the process. Only AMR did.
The judge approved the termination of the pilots contract. He never said no cuts. Like most airlines in the 1113 process a negotiated settlement was reached that set their wages at a peer level. The same thing that happened to Delta and UAL however the peer level was far lower.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 06:24 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Nope.

Pilots approved a bankruptcy contract that permitted 70 seaters up to a specific weight limit (i.e. CRJ700). He "saved" his pension by unilaterally approving an increase in the limit to permit the E170 thinking that he was "dealing" with the company when they realized their oversight.

The joke was on him (and then us) and the pension was not saved. But at least we had more large RJs.

Ugh.
PW was one of the single most destructive forces we've had to deal with. Putting a man with the spinal fortitude of a jellyfish in the MEC was about the dumbest thing this pilot group has ever done. And they replaced Dubinsky with PW because Dubinsky was to mean and didn't mind hurting people's feelings. At least PW wore his pinky ring at all times, and thought he was going to get a permenant seat on the board. Freaking dirtbag!

Runner up was placeing WM in the MEC during the last negotiations. I know let's try some milk toast, that'll show em!
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
IA1125
Regional
11
05-21-2012 08:36 AM
withthatsaid182
Regional
55
12-09-2008 04:59 PM
johnso29
Mergers and Acquisitions
19
04-14-2008 04:18 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-23-2005 12:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices