CFI to UAL CPP
#111
If you actually look at the experience of the vast majority of new hires you’d soon see what a completely ridiculous statement this is.
#112
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 28
Have fun baby sitting your puppy mill FO. Experience is priceless in this line of work. United disagrees, which is why my family will never set foot on one of your aircraft. Just because someone passes a silly test, figures out how to beat HR at their own games, or makes it through a check ride, doesn't make them a competent pilot. Thousands of hours operating safely in challenging conditions does.
BTW, of course they're inferior. When the fecal matter hits the axial impeller, would you want someone in your right seat that has turbine command experience in all types of conditions, or some goober who was buzzing around the pattern at a CAVU airport in AZ? Better yet, send me your answer after your fire bell goes off at V1 with a special departure in ice, when your CFI becomes as useless as a 3rd nipple.
BTW, of course they're inferior. When the fecal matter hits the axial impeller, would you want someone in your right seat that has turbine command experience in all types of conditions, or some goober who was buzzing around the pattern at a CAVU airport in AZ? Better yet, send me your answer after your fire bell goes off at V1 with a special departure in ice, when your CFI becomes as useless as a 3rd nipple.
#113
[/QUOTE]
If you're referring to the episode that I think you are, there was a LOT more to it than that. Not trying to pick the fly feces from the pepper just to add some clarification. At the time, Boeing said that the engines would suction feed up to max altitude. Which apparently they WILL, but only if you climb to that altitude with the pumps off. But, switch the pumps off at ALT, and the flame goes away.
I think you and I are in agreement here. If experienced guys manage to dork things up on occasion, adding more less experienced guys to the mix might not be the best course of action.
- ACA parked a perfectly operating plane in a guys yard going into CHM.
- Avair (American Eagle) did the same thing going into Dulles.
- Two test pilots (right!) flamed out a CRJ doing high alt testing one day on a ferry flight. They then mishandled the in-flight relight which resulted in a lawn dart.
- Buffalo. He couldn't recognize an imminent stall which he had created, and had no idea what to do with the thrust levers even though his speed was ebbing and the stall warning was going off. Meanwhile, his FO had never been in actual icing conditions and thought that retracting the flaps was in order.
As a unionized and highly trained labor force, we ought to be at the forefront of demanding highly qualified and highly experienced labor to join our ranks. Not relatively low time piston engine CFI's who might have an in that the 8000-hour Turbojet RJ Captain (or high time MIL candidate) doesn't.
If you're referring to the episode that I think you are, there was a LOT more to it than that. Not trying to pick the fly feces from the pepper just to add some clarification. At the time, Boeing said that the engines would suction feed up to max altitude. Which apparently they WILL, but only if you climb to that altitude with the pumps off. But, switch the pumps off at ALT, and the flame goes away.
I think you and I are in agreement here. If experienced guys manage to dork things up on occasion, adding more less experienced guys to the mix might not be the best course of action.
- ACA parked a perfectly operating plane in a guys yard going into CHM.
- Avair (American Eagle) did the same thing going into Dulles.
- Two test pilots (right!) flamed out a CRJ doing high alt testing one day on a ferry flight. They then mishandled the in-flight relight which resulted in a lawn dart.
- Buffalo. He couldn't recognize an imminent stall which he had created, and had no idea what to do with the thrust levers even though his speed was ebbing and the stall warning was going off. Meanwhile, his FO had never been in actual icing conditions and thought that retracting the flaps was in order.
As a unionized and highly trained labor force, we ought to be at the forefront of demanding highly qualified and highly experienced labor to join our ranks. Not relatively low time piston engine CFI's who might have an in that the 8000-hour Turbojet RJ Captain (or high time MIL candidate) doesn't.
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
We just manage the situation.
#116
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 772
Everyone on these boards always complains about how United isnt forward thinking, but when they actually do something that is, we all complain about that too. I see absolutely no problem with it, however our training program needs have an overhaul to accommodate this. My previous regionals were set up to train low time pilots, however when I came to United it was kinda a party the first 2 weeks and a little more serious during sim training. The CFI hires in my opinion should have to have an in classroom setting for systems, more in depth oral about 121 ops, and many more observation rides.
#117
Everyone on these boards always complains about how United isnt forward thinking, but when they actually do something that is, we all complain about that too. I see absolutely no problem with it, however our training program needs have an overhaul to accommodate this. My previous regionals were set up to train low time pilots, however when I came to United it was kinda a party the first 2 weeks and a little more serious during sim training. The CFI hires in my opinion should have to have an in classroom setting for systems, more in depth oral about 121 ops, and many more observation rides.
United may have jumped the gun here and thrown these pilots straight into the inferno. Is it impossible? No but it is not going to be easy nor will it be fun. These pilots got the job but do they have the ability?
#118
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 848
Just to add my unsolicited theory to this conversation.......maybe UAL knows that the experience pool is going to dry up in the future and they’re trying to space it out a little? Otherwise they’re going to have a span of time where ALL their new-hires are “unworthy” of the standards WE all think they should have. I freely admit, I’m jealous as hell. I’ve been slugging it out at a wounded regional for well over a decade, and I have a CHANCE at a CHANCE to go to UAL....maybe. But it’s their game and their rules. When I think too much about it, it doesn’t help my state of mind much, but when I’m as objective as I can be, that’s the theory I come up with. I think they’re trying to drag out the experienced applicants so they still have some, while also making sure they have experienced guys and gals operating their feed. Sucks for those of us who think we have “paid our dues”, but it’s not my company and I don’t make the hiring decisions.
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Military flight training eliminates quite a few of the 100 knot brains from the program. You get a couple looks at a maneuver and then are expected to be proficient at it, and on and on. Add to that the level of training received, formation, aerobatic, extensive OCF/spin training, low level flying, gun pattern, bomb pattern, Air Combat Maneuvering, and, for the Navy, carrier landing; the military training syllabus is arguably far more demanding than most anything in the civilian world.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 11:12 AM