Search

Notices

PBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2017, 11:57 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald

Schedules so late in the month are a very real problem. One that should be addressed along with not honoring seniority and others. I for one am not willing to just sit and accept a sub standard product.
I seem to remember at sUA, in the last contract schedules were due by the 20th. The 17th is a 3-day improvement for some, what do you suggest?
awax is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 12:17 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I seem to remember at sUA, in the last contract schedules were due by the 20th. The 17th is a 3-day improvement for some, what do you suggest?
Move the whole thing forward several weeks. The "late" bids at sUA were one of the contract concessions to enable "marketing" more time to play with their schedule.

Guess what? If marketing does not have plan for October by August we've found the problem.

Other airlines have their PBS awards before we even see the bid package. That's the real problem and a faster mainframe to run the PBS optimization is only a bonus and not the actual solution.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 02:00 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: CAP A320
Posts: 301
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I seem to remember at sUA, in the last contract schedules were due by the 20th. The 17th is a 3-day improvement for some, what do you suggest?
I used to remember making 1/2 of what we are making now and being to have our reserve days rolled to infinity and blah blah blah. Give me a break. For an FO, it's pitiful that their skeds can come out just 12 days before the start of a work month, where one might need to know what's going on for planning purposes. NO reason this shouldn't come out at least another week or two earlier WITHOUT giving up anything.
fanaticalflyer is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 02:49 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
NO reason this shouldn't come out at least another week or two earlier WITHOUT giving up anything.
Are you suggesting that this has no value to the company, or are you suggesting that the company should just roll over to ALPA's request?
El10 is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 04:28 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

I think he's suggesting that collectively, we are a bunch of Mr Loopner's.
oldmako is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 06:46 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Move the whole thing forward several weeks. The "late" bids at sUA were one of the contract concessions to enable "marketing" more time to play with their schedule.

Guess what? If marketing does not have plan for October by August we've found the problem.

Other airlines have their PBS awards before we even see the bid package. That's the real problem and a faster mainframe to run the PBS optimization is only a bonus and not the actual solution.
I'm the furthest thing from being an apologist for PBS. I'm just pointing out that it's three days better than it used to be, and that's a start
awax is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:10 AM
  #67  
Guppy reserve EWR
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
OK do you really want to fly with Captain **** or is it worth the sort and verification that your no-fly list actually gets considered.

I know let's do it this way; just allow the computer to make one run and then publish the results. Then let the buyer beware and individual pilot sort through the list of results and see if they got screwed or not.

If so let the results be grieved and sent to the system board for review two months later.

I'd say for most the five day wait has proven to be far less costly than letting the chips fall where they may.
Why can't PBS be programmed to allow a no fly list from the start?
PA Slammer is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:47 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Default

Originally Posted by PA Slammer
Why can't PBS be programmed to allow a no fly list from the start?
How can it AVOID, or AWARD, trips with a particular Captain if the Captain's haven't been awarded their trips yet?

Also, a percentage of the trips awarded to LCAs are withheld from F/Os per the UPA. Can't withhold those trips until you know which trips will be awarded to the LCAs.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:55 AM
  #69  
Guppy reserve EWR
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 501
Default

AFTER the Captains get their lines. My point was why can't the software do this.
PA Slammer is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:46 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Default

Originally Posted by PA Slammer
AFTER the Captains get their lines. My point was why can't the software do this.
I guess I don't understand the question. PBS does do what it seems to me that you are asking.
Larry in TN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PolishFlyerDude
Delta
18
10-10-2016 03:19 PM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 04:22 AM
jetlink
United
45
07-30-2015 10:20 AM
flightmedic01
United
30
09-20-2014 08:19 AM
Redundant Guy
Regional
198
01-28-2013 08:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices