Search

Notices

17-07v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2017, 11:56 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
I am.

Just compare our current total compensation (pay+retirment+medical+other) to the going "market rate."

If nothing else, use JetBlue (no contract) as a proxy for narrow body pilots. You'd be looking at an approximate 30% cut and a hit to scheduling and work rules.

The only pilot shortage is at the regionals, and it's really a pay shortage. There is absolutely no shortage of pilots willing to work for 2/3's of the UPA.

Once the union is gone we can get rid of that silly seniority system that costs the company $$$ and simply roster pilots. Heck, pilots could place economic bids (like the independent contractors they have become) for BES.

Low bid wins. That's door #2.
Nailed it.
Grumble is offline  
Old 03-20-2017, 05:54 PM
  #62  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
FO bid 44 spots to SFO/EWR 737/320.

New hire spots for the summer classes.
Well not really. Only 19 are unfilled so that's about 1 new hire's class worth of seats.
svergin is offline  
Old 03-20-2017, 06:28 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Well not really. Only 19 are unfilled so that's about 1 new hire's class worth of seats.
HA! I saw that. I love when they try to guess what pilots are going to do. Guess there will be another bid out the week after this one closes.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 03-21-2017, 12:23 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Well not really. Only 19 are unfilled so that's about 1 new hire's class worth of seats.
They'll just adjust the min/max numbers before the bid closes, and or back fill movmeent with unfilled spots.

Lot of guys bidding down from 756.
Grumble is offline  
Old 03-21-2017, 03:55 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by b52dthdlr
i agree with you 100% om. apparently these young republican conservatives in our cockpits believe in "right to work" (LMFAO). if RTW passes im immediately leaving the union and not paying any dues because i refuse to pay for those freeloaders. the young republicans will deserve the no benefits 777 CAP $165/hr jobs they voted for......
>>apparently these young republican conservatives in our cockpits believe in "right to work"<<
Ah come on! Why are you overstating the issue? NOT every Republican will leave ALPA if a RTW law is passed. Most pilots on this property know that ALPA does great work for the pilots. We don't always agree with ALPA but most of us understand what working conditions we would have is ALPA or any other labor organization was thrown off the property.
krudawg is offline  
Old 03-21-2017, 04:42 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

I don't believe that's what he said. But more to the point, have the Dems ever pushed for NRTW legislation? Did any Dems support the last elections attempt to eliminate unions? Lets not be coy here, only one party hates unions and has pushed for NRTW legislation.
oldmako is offline  
Old 03-21-2017, 06:20 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
>>apparently these young republican conservatives in our cockpits believe in "right to work"<<
Ah come on! Why are you overstating the issue? NOT every Republican will leave ALPA if a RTW law is passed. Most pilots on this property know that ALPA does great work for the pilots. We don't always agree with ALPA but most of us understand what working conditions we would have is ALPA or any other labor organization was thrown off the property.
God forbid this Federal RTW law doesn't pass... if it does their will be more than conservative pilots bailing on the union to save a few bucks. Pilots will eat their own to make an extra buck unfortunately...
ugleeual is offline  
Old 03-22-2017, 05:20 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
God forbid this Federal RTW law doesn't pass... if it does their will be more than conservative pilots bailing on the union to save a few bucks. Pilots will eat their own to make an extra buck unfortunately...
Utah and Georgia are "right to work" states .. any guess on how many of those conservative Delta pilots have bailed on ALPA to save a few bucks? Tim Canoll perhaps ?? Oh yeah, Texas too, but there aren't any major airline hubs down there. While I neither support nor advocate RTW, my point is that the sky didn't fall in the states that have it, nor did union membership plunge in those states.
rp2pilot is offline  
Old 03-22-2017, 05:30 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
Default

ALPA Union membership didn't plunge in those states because airlines fall into the Railway Labor Act, not state union rules.

The fear is that the government in place will craft a NATIONAL right to work law. If this happens, you bet there will be consequences.
Deafguppy is offline  
Old 03-22-2017, 06:41 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by Deafguppy
ALPA Union membership didn't plunge in those states because airlines fall into the Railway Labor Act, not state union rules.

The fear is that the government in place will craft a NATIONAL right to work law. If this happens, you bet there will be consequences.
I believe Ellis vs BRAC, 1984, would still apply, as it does now. An employee can opt out of union "dues" but not an agency fee which represents the portion of union dues that pays for collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment. I honestly don't know what that differential is .. for our union, which doesn't use dues for political activities, I think the difference is miniscule. Thankfully, I don't see many slick ties out there, and I wouldn't expect it to change due to RTW. Only a sociopath would choose to work in an environment where they are universally hated.
rp2pilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices