Search

Notices

17-07v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2017, 01:23 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Not true. One side (at least) makes an attempt to ameliorate damage to labor while the other actively and repeatedly tries to screw it.
Try again...

AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times

DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights


There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.

If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
Grumble is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 01:44 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Try again...

AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times

DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights


There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.

If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
From the article: "Regardless of our appreciation of the public policy arguments raised by opponents, we have been advised that the law and our bilateral obligations leave us no avenue to reject this application.”

It goes back much farther than the Obama administration.
JoePatroni is online now  
Old 03-23-2017, 02:37 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Try again...

AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times

DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights


There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.

If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
The outcome of American was exactly what labor wanted but nice try. We have already covered how Obama did all he could to delay NAI without jeopardizing all our Atlantic flying.

Now back to the issue about the one party pushing RTW. Until republican pilots can come to grips with the fact that they are the party trying to weaken and destroy the very union they are a member of, the rest if us will feel they are a threat.
El10 is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 03:44 PM
  #94  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by El10
Now back to the issue about the one party pushing RTW. Until republican pilots can come to grips with the fact that they are the party trying to weaken and destroy the very union they are a member of, the rest if us will feel they are a threat.
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they do anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
svergin is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 03:59 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dragon7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Pressing On
Posts: 524
Default

Back to 17-07V, comgrats to folks who are going to get to the coast of their choice. Wonder if the crew planning folks anticipated this?

Probably not.
Dragon7 is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 04:17 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Try again...

AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times

DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights


There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.

If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
Clearly, you don't know "the rest of the story" regarding Clinton and the AA pilots. Show me legislation proposed by Dems to eliminate unions. And, the treaty that Bush the elder signed allowing NAI to begin ops, and the amount of huge corporate money spent by FAR deeper pockets than ALPA's who wanted the whole bag of feces to proceed. Anyone who thought that we actually stood a chance against Boeing (along with other well heeled interests) is in jeopardy of giving a false positive on their next drug test.

Last edited by oldmako; 03-23-2017 at 04:43 PM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 03-23-2017, 07:35 PM
  #97  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 162
Default 17-07v

Originally Posted by LibertyPilot
I flew corporate as well for 15 years and the difference is night and day. The pressure to get the job done no matter what can be intense when one is worrying about one's income being in jeopardy. I know of pilots being fired for placing the owners wife's bag on the ramp prior to loading all the multitude of bags (loaded by the pilots btw). Or how about a major flight dept in the Atlanta area that makes beverages and laid guys off out of seniority. I'll be a happy dues payer the rest of my career RTW or not.


I can assure you from what I witnessed in my corporate flying career that the lack of ethics, integrity and character of these corporate executives are mind boggling. They are brazen, egotistical and have no conscience. No need to look any further than the previous CEO as a confirmation that true leadership is severely lacking in our country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Count Dracula is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 05:26 AM
  #98  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they do anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
President Rump was already asked to reverse the decision on NAI. He said no. You will get no help from him.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 06:37 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 666
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they dot anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
Others have already pointed out your lack of knowledge of the history and backstories of the events you claim are examples of Democratic indifference towards airlines and unions.

Regarding DC-Dubai, the awarding of the government flying to JetBlue/Emirates followed the law/regulations. The law/regulations that the majors had previously lobbied to have adjusted to include their codeshare/alliance partners. It was a competitive bid and Jetblue was selected. It had a cheaper airfare and its overall application was scored higher then UAL's. Don't you want your government to spend your tax dollars wisely?

Here is the Protest denial:

U.S. GAO - United Airlines, Inc.

How come no one complains that UAL won the award for ATL-FRA? UAL certainly doesn't fly that route with its own metal, it is flown on Lufthansa.

https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearc...r=Search+FY+17

And while losing the GSA award on that route hurt the bottom line of UAL, I'm not convinced it wouldn't have dropped it anyways. From a war time, monopoly route that made $$$ to a route where the war ended and thus government travel was down and now you also had three other carriers flying that market (the ME3).
C11DCA is offline  
Old 03-24-2017, 08:24 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
Others have already pointed out your lack of knowledge of the history and backstories of the events you claim are examples of Democratic indifference towards airlines and unions.

Regarding DC-Dubai, the awarding of the government flying to JetBlue/Emirates followed the law/regulations. The law/regulations that the majors had previously lobbied to have adjusted to include their codeshare/alliance partners. It was a competitive bid and Jetblue was selected. It had a cheaper airfare and its overall application was scored higher then UAL's. Don't you want your government to spend your tax dollars wisely?

Here is the Protest denial:

U.S. GAO - United Airlines, Inc.

How come no one complains that UAL won the award for ATL-FRA? UAL certainly doesn't fly that route with its own metal, it is flown on Lufthansa.

https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearc...r=Search+FY+17

And while losing the GSA award on that route hurt the bottom line of UAL, I'm not convinced it wouldn't have dropped it anyways. From a war time, monopoly route that made $$$ to a route where the war ended and thus government travel was down and now you also had three other carriers flying that market (the ME3).
Ask a JetBlue ALPA member if they support codeshare with Emirates .. they'll either be truthful and say yes, or lie and say no. They WANT the ME codeshares since they lack the international feed. Therein lies the problem with lobbying this issue. Ask Boeing Union members if they want NAI .. more 787's, more jobs, no brainer. Ask Delta if they want ATC modernization for better slot management in the Northeast. They don't care about that so much .. it'd help United more than them and they don't want that.

This is the problem with pseudo-deregulation. Everyone still has to rely on their man in Washington to get an advantage. That's great until someone else presents a better bargain to the man in Washington. What can you do at that point, complain that your competitors' payoffs were larger than yours?
rp2pilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices