17-07v
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,871
Try again...
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
It goes back much farther than the Obama administration.
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Try again...
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
Now back to the issue about the one party pushing RTW. Until republican pilots can come to grips with the fact that they are the party trying to weaken and destroy the very union they are a member of, the rest if us will feel they are a threat.
#94
UCH Pilot
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they do anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
#96
Try again...
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
AMERICAN AIRLINE PILOTS STRIKE BUT CLINTON ORDERS THEM BACK - The New York Times
DOT approves contested Norwegian Air flights
There are many others, but I know you already know that. NAI being the most egregious slap in the face in a generation.
If you're a public sector union employee, then I would agree with you.
Last edited by oldmako; 03-23-2017 at 04:43 PM.
#97
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 162
17-07v
I flew corporate as well for 15 years and the difference is night and day. The pressure to get the job done no matter what can be intense when one is worrying about one's income being in jeopardy. I know of pilots being fired for placing the owners wife's bag on the ramp prior to loading all the multitude of bags (loaded by the pilots btw). Or how about a major flight dept in the Atlanta area that makes beverages and laid guys off out of seniority. I'll be a happy dues payer the rest of my career RTW or not.
I can assure you from what I witnessed in my corporate flying career that the lack of ethics, integrity and character of these corporate executives are mind boggling. They are brazen, egotistical and have no conscience. No need to look any further than the previous CEO as a confirmation that true leadership is severely lacking in our country.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#98
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they do anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 666
Wrong. More scare tactics. Nothing we can do about it anyway. The #1 thing we have been fighting in the last administration was NAI and ME3 and Obama approved NAI right as he was leaving office, and gave Emirates the DC-Dubai route. If Democrats were our friends, why didn't they dot anything when they were in power? Let's see what Trump does. At least he was willing to meet with the airline CEOs unlike the last guy.
Regarding DC-Dubai, the awarding of the government flying to JetBlue/Emirates followed the law/regulations. The law/regulations that the majors had previously lobbied to have adjusted to include their codeshare/alliance partners. It was a competitive bid and Jetblue was selected. It had a cheaper airfare and its overall application was scored higher then UAL's. Don't you want your government to spend your tax dollars wisely?
Here is the Protest denial:
U.S. GAO - United Airlines, Inc.
How come no one complains that UAL won the award for ATL-FRA? UAL certainly doesn't fly that route with its own metal, it is flown on Lufthansa.
https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearc...r=Search+FY+17
And while losing the GSA award on that route hurt the bottom line of UAL, I'm not convinced it wouldn't have dropped it anyways. From a war time, monopoly route that made $$$ to a route where the war ended and thus government travel was down and now you also had three other carriers flying that market (the ME3).
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Airbus 320 Captain
Posts: 481
Others have already pointed out your lack of knowledge of the history and backstories of the events you claim are examples of Democratic indifference towards airlines and unions.
Regarding DC-Dubai, the awarding of the government flying to JetBlue/Emirates followed the law/regulations. The law/regulations that the majors had previously lobbied to have adjusted to include their codeshare/alliance partners. It was a competitive bid and Jetblue was selected. It had a cheaper airfare and its overall application was scored higher then UAL's. Don't you want your government to spend your tax dollars wisely?
Here is the Protest denial:
U.S. GAO - United Airlines, Inc.
How come no one complains that UAL won the award for ATL-FRA? UAL certainly doesn't fly that route with its own metal, it is flown on Lufthansa.
https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearc...r=Search+FY+17
And while losing the GSA award on that route hurt the bottom line of UAL, I'm not convinced it wouldn't have dropped it anyways. From a war time, monopoly route that made $$$ to a route where the war ended and thus government travel was down and now you also had three other carriers flying that market (the ME3).
Regarding DC-Dubai, the awarding of the government flying to JetBlue/Emirates followed the law/regulations. The law/regulations that the majors had previously lobbied to have adjusted to include their codeshare/alliance partners. It was a competitive bid and Jetblue was selected. It had a cheaper airfare and its overall application was scored higher then UAL's. Don't you want your government to spend your tax dollars wisely?
Here is the Protest denial:
U.S. GAO - United Airlines, Inc.
How come no one complains that UAL won the award for ATL-FRA? UAL certainly doesn't fly that route with its own metal, it is flown on Lufthansa.
https://cpsearch.fas.gsa.gov/cpsearc...r=Search+FY+17
And while losing the GSA award on that route hurt the bottom line of UAL, I'm not convinced it wouldn't have dropped it anyways. From a war time, monopoly route that made $$$ to a route where the war ended and thus government travel was down and now you also had three other carriers flying that market (the ME3).
This is the problem with pseudo-deregulation. Everyone still has to rely on their man in Washington to get an advantage. That's great until someone else presents a better bargain to the man in Washington. What can you do at that point, complain that your competitors' payoffs were larger than yours?