Search

Notices

Breaking News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2022, 06:43 PM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Default Be safe out there!

Originally Posted by baseball
you know, i think you're right. I need to read my ops manual before every push to make sure we're doing it in compliance with the fom/wom. It may take a bit to get the flight deck properly organized and to ensure we're fully in compliance with all our rules and procedures.
^^^^^^this^^^^^^^^

we should all be fully compliant with all rules and company procedures at all times.
Augerin is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:50 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
Like many have already said in reply to you and like I said in my post, "Since UA is the first major pilot group to be put to the test in this round of negotiations, your pilot group will set the bar for our entire profession." That's why I have such a "hard on" (your words) for what's going on with United's TA. If each airline's pilot group existed in a vacuum and United's pilot group had ratified the garbage TA they had before them, I could care less. But unfortunately for us this round of negotiations, our contracts are created in a pattern bargaining environment. If United's pilot group ratifies anything remotely close to this TA, it lowers the bar for every airline pilot in the US and Canada.
I've got no problem with that, but fewer posts, less pontification, and much more brevity on your part would be nice.
Andy is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:51 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 216
Default

You know, I actually think with some serious work this thing could be polished up and be good. But this negotiating committee has lied directly to our faces multiple times in town halls and FAQs and I don’t trust them for anything, especially to negotiate for me.
Wilfortina is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:52 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
Like many have already said in reply to you and like I said in my post, "Since UA is the first major pilot group to be put to the test in this round of negotiations, your pilot group will set the bar for our entire profession." That's why I have such a "hard on" (your words) for what's going on with United's TA. If each airline's pilot group existed in a vacuum and United's pilot group had ratified the garbage TA they had before them, I could care less. But unfortunately for us this round of negotiations, our contracts are created in a pattern bargaining environment. If United's pilot group ratifies anything remotely close to this TA, it lowers the bar for every airline pilot in the US and Canada.
Like I’ve said. I truly wish the vote would close Friday and results released. Your over the top “contributions “ to our process via this forum have not moved the needle. Believe it or not, the vast majority of us have read the TA and voted NO accordingly. I’m hopeful the next three months will bring about a much better TA in which to vote on. It is embarrassing enough that the NC is just now talking about polling the pilot group. Many of us were asking our LEC reps about this in 2021 and earlier this year. Trust us to do the right thing here.
Vernon Demerest is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:52 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
Default

So does anyone know how realistic it is that we recall these unbelievably negligent (leaning more towards corrupt) “representatives” of ours before they screw us over with another “industry leading” deal? I have my doubts that we can clean house quick enough.
SwampFoxx is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:54 PM
  #76  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 184
Default

More

AlettaOcean is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:00 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
Default

Prob wishful thinking here, but maybe they love their cushy union jobs enough that they actually deliver this time. Still may not be enough unless it’s truly mesmerizing.
SwampFoxx is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:06 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
I hear you and agree for the most part. Delta and American definitely have a vested interest in the outcome of this agreement. I still feel a bit burned by all the “warrior spirit” a decade plus ago as SWA pilots openly plotted the demise of UAL/US Air/ American and Delta. It was sick. I just had a Delta friend call me (two days ago) and he mentioned how bizarre it was to see so many SWA guys/gals being so aggressive about this TA. Just seems strange to me but your points are valid
I can empathize with you on this. And I assume you're talking about SWA pilots like this guy, speaking about the beat down the piloting profession took during the 2000's, quoted in a NY Times article from 2006: "'It's hard for me to feel sorry for them,' said So-and-so . . . [a Southwest union official], who have always flown longer hours than pilots at older airlines. 'They're a bunch of spoiled brats,' he said. 'Historically, this has been a really cushy job once you get to the majors. You make a lot of money and you don't have to fly a lot. But there had to be a market balancing at some point.'" We have a heritage of guys like that. That's embarrassing. Hopefully, we've turned the corner and the new guys in place are on an entirely different level. Hopefully, guys like that guy are either waking up or retiring out. We will see. But ya, it's frustrating to me that one of our guys had the nerve to say something like that. And I know he wasn't alone in how he felt. It would likely be even more frustrating to me had I been in your shoes at the time.
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:18 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
I can empathize with you on this. And I assume you're talking about SWA pilots like this guy, speaking about the beat down the piloting profession took during the 2000's, quoted in a NY Times article from 2006: "'It's hard for me to feel sorry for them,' said So-and-so . . . [a Southwest union official], who have always flown longer hours than pilots at older airlines. 'They're a bunch of spoiled brats,' he said. 'Historically, this has been a really cushy job once you get to the majors. You make a lot of money and you don't have to fly a lot. But there had to be a market balancing at some point.'" We have a heritage of guys like that. That's embarrassing. Hopefully, we've turned the corner and the new guys in place are on an entirely different level. Hopefully, guys like that guy are either waking up or retiring out. We will see. But ya, it's frustrating to me that one of our guys had the nerve to say something like that. And I know he wasn't alone in how he felt. It would likely be even more frustrating to me had I been in your shoes at the time.
Exactly. And some so called “friends of mine” who would tell me that they were looking forward to a base here or there when XYZ airline folded and “we take their gates”. Hard to forget some of this stuff and all the while happily working with very little work rules in order to “give ole Herb an advantage” so you could move in and take advantage of a strong legacy contract’s demise. And now to demand one of those very legacy’s pilots to raise the bar a certain height so you can improve your contract? Sorry. It isn’t personal to you but it is hard to get that taste out of my mouth. Thanks for your words.
Vernon Demerest is offline  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:25 PM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 56
Default

The thing is, it’s not like they (MEC, NC) were a little high on the glideslope, called for a go around, and want us to relax and trust them to get us on the ground safely. It’s more
like they were drunk and doing lines off an FAs ___ while busting through mins, but now they realize they were wrong, sobered up, and we should relax and trust them this time. Egregious.
SwampFoxx is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James2016
Corporate
5
05-30-2020 06:48 PM
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
kuma66
Air Wisconsin
3
04-21-2019 03:11 AM
stoki
Regional
11227
04-26-2017 08:03 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices