CRJ Drivers....what headset do you use?
12-18-2007, 06:11 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 125
CRJ Drivers....what headset do you use?
I have tried the search function and can't find a clear thread of just CRJ drivers and headsets. I am on the 700. The company provides David Clamps which I don't care for because they don't fit (I got a big head) and I don't care to swab down a headset before every flight wondering if I got it all. I am eyeballing the MS200 from Plantronics or....keeping my Telex Stratus 30XTs....but the 30XT's are way big to be lugging around everyday. Could current/former CRJ 200/700/900 drivers comment on what they use?
12-19-2007, 01:23 PM
#3
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 44
I tried the Telex 850 and QC2 with uflymike mike setup.
I had the Bose X but finally tried the Lightspeed Mach 1 and loved it. I paid the extra $125 for custom ear molds.
I would never use another headset in the CRJ. I wear sunglasses and find the bose qc2 and X push on the sunglasses frame and after 6-8 hours hurt. Same with 850 but not as bad. The Mach 1 has really great mic pickup. No hissing.
Here is the order I would place on the above headsets.
#1 Lightspeed Mach 1
#2 Bose X
#3 QC2
#4 850
(#3 and #4 are very close tie. QC2 is full ear cup 850 is on ear. both good, just not as good as above.)
I had the Bose X but finally tried the Lightspeed Mach 1 and loved it. I paid the extra $125 for custom ear molds.
I would never use another headset in the CRJ. I wear sunglasses and find the bose qc2 and X push on the sunglasses frame and after 6-8 hours hurt. Same with 850 but not as bad. The Mach 1 has really great mic pickup. No hissing.
Here is the order I would place on the above headsets.
#1 Lightspeed Mach 1
#2 Bose X
#3 QC2
#4 850
(#3 and #4 are very close tie. QC2 is full ear cup 850 is on ear. both good, just not as good as above.)
12-19-2007, 08:56 PM
#4
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,108
The 850 is not as powerful in the ANR realm, but has several advantages...
Relatively Cheap
No Batteries (with most ANR's, when your batteries die you go lost comms)
Light and Comfortable
Small (fits easily in your flight case)
It has enough active and passive noise reduction for the CRJ, but an ERJ or turboprop might be a different story. My TELEXs have all proven indestructible...I lose them before they break.
Relatively Cheap
No Batteries (with most ANR's, when your batteries die you go lost comms)
Light and Comfortable
Small (fits easily in your flight case)
It has enough active and passive noise reduction for the CRJ, but an ERJ or turboprop might be a different story. My TELEXs have all proven indestructible...I lose them before they break.
12-21-2007, 07:20 AM
#6
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Double Breasted Leather
Posts: 28
Sennheiser HMEC-25 KAS.
Work great in CRJ. ANR is great and the KAS version has dual volume controls for each ear(important for turning down the bells and chimes). Sound quality is awesome. Does eat batteries though. I just rotate out some rechargeable's.
Work great in CRJ. ANR is great and the KAS version has dual volume controls for each ear(important for turning down the bells and chimes). Sound quality is awesome. Does eat batteries though. I just rotate out some rechargeable's.
12-21-2007, 07:51 PM
#7
Blue Light Special
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Learjet 45 & G-IV
Posts: 637
you know what I don't understand? wouldn't ANR technically be worse for your ears? sure it 'sounds' quieter, but aren't they really pumping more sound into your ears? more sound = bad... or so i thought?
12-24-2007, 04:31 PM
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 34
Slip
12-24-2007, 04:33 PM
#9
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 34
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
