Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:07 AM
  #9711  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 715
Default

I'd vote yes if they put two extra days off on my schedule in the month they want me to complete this training. All else being equal.

This is one step in the march to reduce the need for pilots and gain 'efficiency'. I wonder if any analysis has been done on how this will effect staffing?
ManFlex is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:16 AM
  #9712  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by ManFlex
I'd vote yes if they put two extra days off on my schedule in the month they want me to complete this training. All else being equal.

This is one step in the march to reduce the need for pilots and gain 'efficiency'. I wonder if any analysis has been done on how this will effect staffing?
Preach!!!!
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:22 AM
  #9713  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Yup, we need those two days off restored and boom, everyone is happy
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:22 AM
  #9714  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Default

Originally Posted by northdakota
They must think we are stupid. Great preview of things to come from our negotiating committee.
Exactly!


Not only is this TA (it's a TA, not LOA for now) weak in substance, I see several holes in the language. Remember, they (MEC) had all the time they wanted to proof and send the NC back for improvement. This is the final product they decided to send us. Also keep in mind, given the savings to the company, we have the leverage on this issue. The company should want this more than we do.

Example of holes?
B2 - How is "fair market" determined? Think 5 years from now you are sent a $600 bill for a 6 year old ipad you could pick up online for $50. Also, the normal grievance procedures apply to finding fault on the loss of equipment. The process would go like this (for your $50 ipad)...
- I lost my ipad while maintaining due diligence.
- company disagrees
-MEC files formal grievance
-company dismisses grievance
Next step? Arbitration.
Ask yourself if your MEC is going to spend 10K arbitrating a $50 ipad. Easier and cheaper to send you the $600 bill. Maybe they will payroll deduct it for you.

B7 Bothers me too. The requirement is to "meet and confer", just like we have now with uniforms. As stated before, the company could dress us in gorilla suits if they wanted, all they are required to do is "confer" with the MEC.
Plane Ramrod is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:27 AM
  #9715  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cruise's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Exactly!


Not only is this TA (it's a TA, not LOA for now) weak in substance, I see several holes in the language. Remember, they (MEC) had all the time they wanted to proof and send the NC back for improvement. This is the final product they decided to send us. Also keep in mind, given the savings to the company, we have the leverage on this issue. The company should want this more than we do.

Example of holes?
B2 - How is "fair market" determined? Think 5 years from now you are sent a $600 bill for a 6 year old ipad you could pick up online for $50. Also, the normal grievance procedures apply to finding fault on the loss of equipment. The process would go like this (for your $50 ipad)...
- I lost my ipad while maintaining due diligence.
- company disagrees
-MEC files formal grievance
-company dismisses grievance
Next step? Arbitration.
Ask yourself if your MEC is going to spend 10K arbitrating a $50 ipad. Easier and cheaper to send you the $600 bill. Maybe they will payroll deduct it for you.

B7 Bothers me too. The requirement is to "meet and confer", just like we have now with uniforms. As stated before, the company could dress us in gorilla suits if they wanted, all they are required to do is "confer" with the MEC.

Thanks! I just spewed coffee all over my laptop.


Edit: Yeah, not impressed with this. Nowhere near enough money/ time off to balance the operational efficiencies the company will gain from this. If this is the kind of work the NC is planning to deliver for the next CBA...well, they might want to think again. Did I mention how unimpressive this TA is?!? While I look forward to the day of ditching paper jepps/ manuals, this distance training isn't gonna work for me in it's current iteration.

That said, I don't see using iPads for operational use and distance training as a singularity. The company has plenty reason to proceed with operational use regardless of our agreeing to distance learning. No reason we can't agree to in-flight usage while still working out the details of remote training.

For now it's a big fat NO here!

Last edited by Cruise; 01-20-2015 at 11:34 AM. Reason: More stuff
Cruise is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:33 AM
  #9716  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Anyone know what "industry standard" is for distance learning,?
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:34 AM
  #9717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Excel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: One man wolfpack
Posts: 246
Default

RE 2 days off-

Correct me if I am wrong, but we will still be responsible for 1 day of ground school conducted in a classroom, paid up to 9hrs. So a non-fll based pilot will need 2 days of travel plus class equaling three days for training. Doesn't this one day of classroom in effect equal at least 2 extra days off because they would have to drop a trip to get you to and from FLL and have the required time off before and after training?

As long as we are still required to attend class for 1 day, I feel like we are going to get a training conflict out of this. Assuming you are not FLL based.

Someone feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Excel is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:36 AM
  #9718  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

I just contacted my rep to let him know that not only is this a NO vote, but why it is a no vote. The MEC needs to punt this dirty diaper back to the NC and say "Not good enough"

Also, this is a "strike 1," in my view, on what the NC is negotiating. Junk like this can not be presented or allowed to make it to the pilot group for vote.
The Juice is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:37 AM
  #9719  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 23
Default

I credited 92 hours just for ground school last month. 92. That's with 2 drops, picking up a trip and actual ground school on days off. That's in addition to the rest of my flying for the month.

So, 5 hours per day instead of 4...I didn't take any math in college, but that seems like 2 extra hours of pay. And when the frak are we supposed to do this training?

Those of you hoping only for 2 measly days off think about this.

I'll take the possibility of 92 hours, even if it isn't reality every year. Plus they're saving a ton on hotels, trip drops, positive space and poor Bruce is gonna be out of a job, ok?

As much as I want a new iPad, it looks like a no for me.
Brickhouse is offline  
Old 01-20-2015, 11:45 AM
  #9720  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

This isnt a "we dont get ipads" or "we do". The company has the ipads in a closet, paid for, and running testing on them. We vote this down and send it back to say "do better." The company knows that there is a ton of room for them to make money with these things and still increase the pay for us.
The Juice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices