Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2015, 04:07 AM
  #9371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 320 Left soon middle
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by RP4242
You are trying to disprove someone who does know the exact numbers with hypothetical numbers that you are guessing . The operational factors of operating longer stage lengths are well worth it when you factor in the revenue. Look, im not saying that NK is a transcon airline, just that dreams of whacking at the stage length does not make sense. + The catch-22 is that in a high oil environment you run into major capacity controls and you sacrifice short stages for longer ones and now in a lower oil environment you think about competition from other modes of transport that suddenly are legitimized again (namely, cars).
Dude if you know the numbers why do you let me write essays with my poor English? Just say so. So what are the numbers? What is the stage length that is best for Spirit at $50 a barrel and what is it at $75 and $100? How would that change if they would implement adjusted fees for everything? I would love to know the answer because this will say a lot about our future "on the job QOL".

I went back to my logbook pro (as much as I hate that software) too see what my average block per leg was:

2008 2.2h
2009 sucking my thumb in fetal
2010 2.2h
2011 2.4h
2012 2.5h
2013 2.4h
2014 2.5h

It actually went up after 2010 when we started to introduce more fees. So you might be up to something. I am wondering what others have for averages.

I certainly hope you are right. None of us wants to fly SW schedules here. I would love trips that average 6 hours a day or more but I would rather fly 2 x 3h legs vs 4 x 1.5h.
Normann is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 04:35 AM
  #9372  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

This conversation has really come to make me realize I have no idea how to run an airline
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 05:13 AM
  #9373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by Normann
I would love to know the answer because this will say a lot about our future "on the job QOL".
Yes. Please you guys figure this one out. I need to know if I should update my apps with the legacies.
cynicalaviator is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 05:28 AM
  #9374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 320 Left soon middle
Posts: 488
Default

RP4242,

I have not been paying too much attention to this thread for the past years. So I mistook you for an ex Chautauqua pilot with that handle. I am like way to go... another RJ pilot with the insight ... well... I used to be one too.

I just now realize that you are actually in some sort of operations/planning role at Spirit. After realizing that I went back and read through your older posts. The ones related to Spirit. It is good to have your inside even though you are only allowed to share so much. I am glad some management types actually care to put their fingers on the pilot's pulse by reading a board like this. I don't want to speak for everyone but I feel there is a huge difference between what is actually happening on the line versus what management thinks is happening. But that is probably every airline out there.

So where do you see Spirit in the next 10 years? How about after that? In your opinion what is the biggest threat to our existence?
Normann is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 06:18 AM
  #9375  
escaped
 
Jett i son's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Default

RP4242 posts are insightful and present a perspective not always familiar to pilots.

By the way, when are we opening the floodgates in the West?
LAX/OAK/PHX are begging for our product!
Would you agree that:
Unless you plan far ahead and check-in 2 pieces of luggage, SWA fares are comparable to Legacies on most routes.
In several markets, especially in the Western US, we could successfully compete for market share.
My friends over there see us as the SWA of the 80s., while they are stagnant, and frustrated with the merger.
Jett i son is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 07:36 AM
  #9376  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by NedsKid
Quote:





Originally Posted by Normann


This chart is interesting. Can you give us the source? Also, I would like to see it next to the yield chart if there is one.




Go to the Spirit.com site, go down to 'investor relations', view the most recent presentation (link)

I don't know how to add all the fancy links, but, if you go to page 11 of that presentation, you'll see a chart titled

"Chasing Spirit is a Money Losing Proposition"
Spirit’s total revenue per passenger is below the competition’s break-even cost

BTW, 'the competition' is Southwest, Alaska, Allegiant, and jetBlue.

I just hope our management remembers that when we're talking about our new contact. Southwest has industry leading:scope
Min Day/Average Daily Guarantee
Medical

Southwest's pay rates aren't far off from industry leading either.

Alaska has industry leading Training Pay.

jetBlue and Allegiant don't lead the industry in anything, but, other than our 4 days off and TX conflict, neither do we.

We all need to recognize we work for an ULTRA low cost carrier, and that our company needs to undercut the competition in order to win business (I wish we could compete on customer service, but I'm not kidding myself). That said, management needs to recognize us, the pilots, as a valuable asset on the team, not a line item on the expense report. Page 5 of that same presentation has 4 bullet points, one of them being:

Keep a low cost mindset
• Continual pressure to eliminate and reduce costs or get someone else to pay for it
• Unit cost targets communicated company-wide
• Bonus program is directly linked to achieving unit cost targets

This is what they tell Wall Street they do.

I see the pressure part, but I don't see unit cost targets ever communicated to me, and I can sure as heck tell you I have never seen a bonus from all the targets I helped to achieve.

This company has the most aggressive single-engine taxi and save fuel culture I have ever seen, and I, as the pilot, am the one who implements it. An airline's largest single expense is fuel. I have my hand on that spigot, and I do what I can to not waste it (as do 95% of the rest of my group). I don't need a bonus, but I do need to see a piece of the action. Since our unit cost targets seem to be achieved, I'd like to see it reflected in our next CBA.

Agreed. Well said.
Sailor is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 12:15 PM
  #9377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 123
Default

This conversation has really come to make me realize I have no idea how to run an airline
Can you throw darts? How do you think we found AXM

Dude if you know the numbers why do you let me write essays with my poor English? Just say so. So what are the numbers? What is the stage length that is best for Spirit at $50 a barrel and what is it at $75 and $100? How would that change if they would implement adjusted fees for everything? I would love to know the answer because this will say a lot about our future "on the job QOL".
I cant tell you that :-) Until I win the powerball that is, then I can quit and fly around in a Falcon reliving the days of trijet glory.

On a serious note I can expand a bit on fees. The problem that is two-fold.

1. You have logistical issues with implementation. This is mostly an IT problem that has to do with manipulating various things such as time of day, day of week as well as controlling it from a demand curve perspective. Its not really a problem specific to Spirit BTW, its a collective problem for a lot of carriers who are wading through uncharted territory when it comes to how do you set up various systems to deal with it. You have to be mindful to the fact that there is a large chunk of our distribution that we (along with everyone but SWA) dont control and even getting things such as flat-rate fees are being implemented only by acts of god.

Secondly, every market behaves differently and even though you have your averages you have to figure out what works where and why do some things not work in certain places that are of similar distance for example but do not work in others. Demographics and economics come into play here.

As far as the optimal stage length at different oil prices...the general industry consensus is that they rise as prices get higher because capacity discipline dictates that you cut down on short haul stuff where the tendency to make more revenue is less. Now, theres always outliers and it depends on other factors like for example what type of fleet and airline you operate.

Notice for example that Intra-Cal flying even during the recession was pretty soundproof, so was Intra-Texas but Florida took a massive hit. SWA for example chopped ECP-MCO, JAX-FLL, MCO-RSW, MCO-FLL and JAX-TPA without even thinking twice about it. If you think a handful of Saab 340s and 2 E90s up the I-95 corridor have since picked up that slack you better re-examine your numbers. Secondly, in the last round of high oil you were in deep crap if you were a regional flying 50 seaters much more than if you were flying a narrowbody mainline aircraft for the simple reason that your revenue opportunities are almost 0 on those aircraft. That is where Y+/J, Wifi etc. etc. was born out of on the 70-100 seat aircraft market. Without it, that group would be next.

I have not been paying too much attention to this thread for the past years. So I mistook you for an ex Chautauqua pilot with that handle. I am like way to go... another RJ pilot with the insight ... well... I used to be one too.
Dont worry about it. I did fly in a E145 sim once.... :-)

I just now realize that you are actually in some sort of operations/planning role at Spirit. After realizing that I went back and read through your older posts. The ones related to Spirit. It is good to have your inside even though you are only allowed to share so much. I am glad some management types actually care to put their fingers on the pilot's pulse by reading a board like this. I don't want to speak for everyone but I feel there is a huge difference between what is actually happening on the line versus what management thinks is happening. But that is probably every airline out there.
Thanks. I try to inform and educate as much as I can, with limits of course. This isnt my first airline, nor is it my second so I can tell you that the schism of whats happening on the ground and in the air exists everywhere (And I also agree with you that it does exist). Sure, it may be more at some places than others but I wouldnt put NK in that "more" category, with the #1 reason being that this is still a fairly small operation so its not a monumental task to get everyone on the same page. Its important for us to not fall into a hole where speculation runs so rampant that theres a group of people that believe the company is going down a path that is completely untrue. Ive seen this before and it is an absolute killer.

On a more micro level when it comes to strategy all I can say is that if you are a pilot you shouldn't be offended even one iota at being kept in the dark on anything that is more than talking points/generalities or whatever you want to call them because you are in the same position that even 99% of people at every airline headquarters are....they just dont know. This sort of stuff has to be kept closely guarded for competitive reasons and divulging sensitive information is a massive no-no, which in some cases could even lead to legal trouble.

For the same reasons while I read what people post in this thread, and others...with the regional forum being my personal favorite if I want to feel better about my day....about contracts and the technicalities of flying I am purely an observer and try to educate myself because I dont know much about actually living it. That being said I wish more people observed and listened because how will you ever fix anything if you dont even know its broken? Maybe the problem is half the time people dont care and not think about how their job or a click of the mouse affects others...all of us probably have fallen into that trap of not thinking about consequences because it does not directly affect us at some point in our lives.

So where do you see Spirit in the next 10 years? How about after that? In your opinion what is the biggest threat to our existence?
Again, a loaded question hehe. Its hard to say what will happen in 10 years and I dont think anyone really knows the answer. You make business decisions based on short and some mid-term probabilities but that is about it. Keep in mind what the market was like in 2004. The legacies were ailing, FL was just ramping up and the L1011 was only 3 summers gone from Delta.

I can share with you my personal opinion. Apart from any sort of merger/acquisition, one which I doubt will happen in the short term, our growth is on more solid economic ground than anyone elses. Theres obviously going to be micro-level humps to go over, some of which you talked about in your post but on macro level this is the best business plan in the US market when it comes to the numbers. We hold such a small piece of the pie that there is nowhere else to go but up. Thats not a pure optimist opinion, but a realistic one.
The micro-level headwinds that we face are actually quite minute if you want to compare them to OAs. Doubt they seem that way in everyday life because they affect us on a personal basis but take a step back for a second and think about if dirty cockpits are worse than having 20% of your fellow pilots who think they just got their heads chopped off by the guillotine by your group who was supposedly colluding with salaried employees. Theres always positives and negatives.

I think it'll be a huge success if we capture a couple % of the total US market share and put in more orders looking out in the future. Frankly, I think that a lot of the talk on here about stagnation is a bit exaggerated. Im not saying youre going to grow 25% every quarter but it almost seems like people think that our fleet should grow 20% yearly until 2040 or something. Give it time...ship isnt sinking or even slowing down, from where we are and from the market that we could potentially capture in the US and rest of the Americas is hilariously large and untapped.

2024 we should have critical mass to make some really big plays, we dont have much political clout right now and its hurting us. Its a question of size so we cant fix it quickly like we can fix some sort of inventory control or schedule problem. FR attained this level a few years ago and now they can dictate external parties to accommodate them and not where they were and we are now...accommodating the external parties.

By the way, when are we opening the floodgates in the West?
LAX/OAK/PHX are begging for our product!
When the time is right. Variety of factors are in play. Market conditions in the PacNW, facility access, Doug Parkers finger on the hub ejection button, CPEs etc. etc.

Unless you plan far ahead and check-in 2 pieces of luggage, SWA fares are comparable to Legacies on most routes.
In several markets, especially in the Western US, we could successfully compete for market share.
My friends over there see us as the SWA of the 80s., while they are stagnant, and frustrated with the merger.
Do you want the short answer...or the long answer? The short one is a sentence. The long one is a few paragraphs.

Last edited by RP4242; 01-06-2015 at 12:37 PM.
RP4242 is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 04:53 PM
  #9378  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PiperPower's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Default Spirit of NKS

Quick jumpseat question here rather than starting a new thread... On the website to list as an OAL jumpseater it's asking for a verification code for my airline. Any idea what it wants? The two letter identifier doesn't work, so that's not it.
Will it be a problem trying to list at the gate if I can't figure this thing out?
PiperPower is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 05:15 PM
  #9379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NedsKid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by PiperPower
On the website to list as an OAL jumpseater it's asking for a verification code for my airline. Any idea what it wants?
There's a code your jumpseat committee chairman has. You get it from him/her.

Originally Posted by PiperPower
Will it be a problem trying to list at the gate if I can't figure this thing out?
No, it shouldn't. All of our gate agents should be able to list you. Just show up 45 mins prior to departure to give them time. Spirit isn't the kind of airline where 3 agents are there to work a flight with 100 people on board. Our staffing model is more of a '1 agent should be able to work 220 passengers, no problem' kind of thing.
NedsKid is offline  
Old 01-06-2015, 06:11 PM
  #9380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Default

Originally Posted by RP4242
Can you throw darts? How do you think we found AXM



I cant tell you that :-) Until I win the powerball that is, then I can quit and fly around in a Falcon reliving the days of trijet glory.

On a serious note I can expand a bit on fees. The problem that is two-fold.

1. You have logistical issues with implementation. This is mostly an IT problem that has to do with manipulating various things such as time of day, day of week as well as controlling it from a demand curve perspective. Its not really a problem specific to Spirit BTW, its a collective problem for a lot of carriers who are wading through uncharted territory when it comes to how do you set up various systems to deal with it. You have to be mindful to the fact that there is a large chunk of our distribution that we (along with everyone but SWA) dont control and even getting things such as flat-rate fees are being implemented only by acts of god.

Secondly, every market behaves differently and even though you have your averages you have to figure out what works where and why do some things not work in certain places that are of similar distance for example but do not work in others. Demographics and economics come into play here.

As far as the optimal stage length at different oil prices...the general industry consensus is that they rise as prices get higher because capacity discipline dictates that you cut down on short haul stuff where the tendency to make more revenue is less. Now, theres always outliers and it depends on other factors like for example what type of fleet and airline you operate.

Notice for example that Intra-Cal flying even during the recession was pretty soundproof, so was Intra-Texas but Florida took a massive hit. SWA for example chopped ECP-MCO, JAX-FLL, MCO-RSW, MCO-FLL and JAX-TPA without even thinking twice about it. If you think a handful of Saab 340s and 2 E90s up the I-95 corridor have since picked up that slack you better re-examine your numbers. Secondly, in the last round of high oil you were in deep crap if you were a regional flying 50 seaters much more than if you were flying a narrowbody mainline aircraft for the simple reason that your revenue opportunities are almost 0 on those aircraft. That is where Y+/J, Wifi etc. etc. was born out of on the 70-100 seat aircraft market. Without it, that group would be next.



Dont worry about it. I did fly in a E145 sim once.... :-)



Thanks. I try to inform and educate as much as I can, with limits of course. This isnt my first airline, nor is it my second so I can tell you that the schism of whats happening on the ground and in the air exists everywhere (And I also agree with you that it does exist). Sure, it may be more at some places than others but I wouldnt put NK in that "more" category, with the #1 reason being that this is still a fairly small operation so its not a monumental task to get everyone on the same page. Its important for us to not fall into a hole where speculation runs so rampant that theres a group of people that believe the company is going down a path that is completely untrue. Ive seen this before and it is an absolute killer.

On a more micro level when it comes to strategy all I can say is that if you are a pilot you shouldn't be offended even one iota at being kept in the dark on anything that is more than talking points/generalities or whatever you want to call them because you are in the same position that even 99% of people at every airline headquarters are....they just dont know. This sort of stuff has to be kept closely guarded for competitive reasons and divulging sensitive information is a massive no-no, which in some cases could even lead to legal trouble.

For the same reasons while I read what people post in this thread, and others...with the regional forum being my personal favorite if I want to feel better about my day....about contracts and the technicalities of flying I am purely an observer and try to educate myself because I dont know much about actually living it. That being said I wish more people observed and listened because how will you ever fix anything if you dont even know its broken? Maybe the problem is half the time people dont care and not think about how their job or a click of the mouse affects others...all of us probably have fallen into that trap of not thinking about consequences because it does not directly affect us at some point in our lives.



Again, a loaded question hehe. Its hard to say what will happen in 10 years and I dont think anyone really knows the answer. You make business decisions based on short and some mid-term probabilities but that is about it. Keep in mind what the market was like in 2004. The legacies were ailing, FL was just ramping up and the L1011 was only 3 summers gone from Delta.

I can share with you my personal opinion. Apart from any sort of merger/acquisition, one which I doubt will happen in the short term, our growth is on more solid economic ground than anyone elses. Theres obviously going to be micro-level humps to go over, some of which you talked about in your post but on macro level this is the best business plan in the US market when it comes to the numbers. We hold such a small piece of the pie that there is nowhere else to go but up. Thats not a pure optimist opinion, but a realistic one.
The micro-level headwinds that we face are actually quite minute if you want to compare them to OAs. Doubt they seem that way in everyday life because they affect us on a personal basis but take a step back for a second and think about if dirty cockpits are worse than having 20% of your fellow pilots who think they just got their heads chopped off by the guillotine by your group who was supposedly colluding with salaried employees. Theres always positives and negatives.

I think it'll be a huge success if we capture a couple % of the total US market share and put in more orders looking out in the future. Frankly, I think that a lot of the talk on here about stagnation is a bit exaggerated. Im not saying youre going to grow 25% every quarter but it almost seems like people think that our fleet should grow 20% yearly until 2040 or something. Give it time...ship isnt sinking or even slowing down, from where we are and from the market that we could potentially capture in the US and rest of the Americas is hilariously large and untapped.

2024 we should have critical mass to make some really big plays, we dont have much political clout right now and its hurting us. Its a question of size so we cant fix it quickly like we can fix some sort of inventory control or schedule problem. FR attained this level a few years ago and now they can dictate external parties to accommodate them and not where they were and we are now...accommodating the external parties.



When the time is right. Variety of factors are in play. Market conditions in the PacNW, facility access, Doug Parkers finger on the hub ejection button, CPEs etc. etc.



Do you want the short answer...or the long answer? The short one is a sentence. The long one is a few paragraphs.
I love reading airline pilot/ amateur finance guys or airline pilot / amateur ops guys type like they have a clue. Such big words... VP ops written all over it. This is defiantly Riddle NK801.
Plane Ramrod is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices