Spirit of NKS
#4361
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
because we are going to implode, and disappear altogether.
Millions of people and companies every hour make decisions to buy or sell securities. Buy crappy companies (in 2010 it was us that even some of our own coworkers didn't give us a year), and others selling apple after SJ die.) people buying FB (me) on day one, and selling 10 bucks cheaper. then buying NK again at 17.28 to get ready to sell next week at 23 (fingers crossed).
Oak-tree is just getting out an cashing in. That's all I know, since I don't seat on the board.
Some people may claim knowledge, but they just speculate with negative stuff because it triggers some weird juice in their brains.
Nobody know, except for oaktree.
Millions of people and companies every hour make decisions to buy or sell securities. Buy crappy companies (in 2010 it was us that even some of our own coworkers didn't give us a year), and others selling apple after SJ die.) people buying FB (me) on day one, and selling 10 bucks cheaper. then buying NK again at 17.28 to get ready to sell next week at 23 (fingers crossed).
Oak-tree is just getting out an cashing in. That's all I know, since I don't seat on the board.
Some people may claim knowledge, but they just speculate with negative stuff because it triggers some weird juice in their brains.
Nobody know, except for oaktree.
#4362
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Sorry but trying to understand the concept. Oaktree is selling their remaining stocks to lower the price to make it more attractive for a buyer ? What is the advantage for Oaktree in this ?
I think they are just getting out of the Spirit thing, but I can't help to question why they do it at the point where Spirit is profitable with a good looking future.
I think they are just getting out of the Spirit thing, but I can't help to question why they do it at the point where Spirit is profitable with a good looking future.
You are right. There is no advantage to Oaktree for doing this, unless they are in cahoots with someone else who wants to buy the company. That would make no sense because Oaktree would sell their stock and have no stake in the company before the value went up. It is illegal (to collaborate) and a breach of fiduciary trust of thier own stockholders. They are just cashing out.
#4363
because we are going to implode, and disappear altogether.
Millions of people and companies every hour make decisions to buy or sell securities. Buy crappy companies (in 2010 it was us that even some of our own coworkers didn't give us a year), and others selling apple after SJ die.) people buying FB (me) on day one, and selling 10 bucks cheaper. then buying NK again at 17.28 to get ready to sell next week at 23 (fingers crossed).
Oak-tree is just getting out an cashing in. That's all I know, since I don't seat on the board.
Some people may claim knowledge, but they just speculate with negative stuff because it triggers some weird juice in their brains.
Nobody know, except for oaktree.
Millions of people and companies every hour make decisions to buy or sell securities. Buy crappy companies (in 2010 it was us that even some of our own coworkers didn't give us a year), and others selling apple after SJ die.) people buying FB (me) on day one, and selling 10 bucks cheaper. then buying NK again at 17.28 to get ready to sell next week at 23 (fingers crossed).
Oak-tree is just getting out an cashing in. That's all I know, since I don't seat on the board.
Some people may claim knowledge, but they just speculate with negative stuff because it triggers some weird juice in their brains.
Nobody know, except for oaktree.
Oaktree has been selling off those "restricted" shares over the past year. They are now part of the public domain, or float.
Oaktree still has a small stake in Spirit Airlines. They just offered 9.4 million common shares to the public. They still hold roughly 3.6 million restricted shares (not included in the float).
Its my understanding that the stock offered last Tuesday was part of Oaktree's restricted holdings which are now to be publicly traded. The issuance of stock last Tuesday could result in dilution as LeftHanded more accurately described than I could. I think by using the term "sell" rather than "issuance," I created some confusion.
It doesn't mean there's gonna be a purchase of Spirit by another entity. I was just trying to explain that dilution could lead to possible buyout interests when the market cap is perceived to be overvalued.
The entire industry is overvalued and hence, some analysts have started recommending investors sell their airline holdings based upon peak industry load factors and peak RASM. Spirit is the exception.
Here's a link to NASDAQ's holding summary for SAVE. I find it to be pretty accurate and up-to-date:
Spirit Airlines, Inc. (SAVE) Institutional Ownership & Holdings - NASDAQ.com
#4364
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Great find ALPO. It looks like Oaktree had 22.5M shares and sold 9.5M for a change of 42%. They now have a stake of 13M shares in spirit. Either they have additional restrictions (like they can't sell more for another 6 months, for example), or they are just taking some profit. They still have a decent investment in Spirit. There are some interesting companies invested in us!
#4367
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Oak Tree is a distressed debt fund and Spirit no longer fits their criteria
#4368
Great find ALPO. It looks like Oaktree had 22.5M shares and sold 9.5M for a change of 42%. They now have a stake of 13M shares in spirit. Either they have additional restrictions (like they can't sell more for another 6 months, for example), or they are just taking some profit. They still have a decent investment in Spirit. There are some interesting companies invested in us!
I must be fatigued. Hopefully the moderators won't tell me they're 'dissapointed' in my posts.
#4369
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 492
Ha ha ha. I see what you did there........
#4370
Steep learning curve though.
I kept wondering "what speed is it going to pick next?". Blue Speed, Double Amber Dash + 10 Speed? Mini French Fu(K speed, Orange Speed (Magenta for you Alternative Speed types)? or Gol dang it why is it Going Around Speed! Push a button! Push a button!
Like most airplanes it seems once you get the hang of it - it's all about judgement.
The RJ guys have obviously demonstrated their ability to fly the aircraft and have 121 experience. Hard to compete with that.
Unless you don't take into account entitlement and youth.
I'd rather sit next to a "analog" guy that still thinks Goldie Hawn was hot on Laugh-In and actually helps me check the logbook for screw ups.
What I don't get is the financials. Why hire a guy that will be here until we're bought, merged, grown, or stolen?
Want to keep pilot labor cost down?
DUH
The correct financial decision is to hire only over 60's that have experience.
No bent metal. Minimal FAA oversight. Minimal labor cost over the five year plan.
Delta Uniform Hotel
Edited to add:
Over 60's Don't tell, Don't Swell and they're Grateful as Hell!
Last edited by Hugh Betcha; 08-02-2012 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Edited to add
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post