Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015, 05:32 AM
  #11361  
Line Holder
 
Android's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by MikeBerkowitz
. And now the weight of this entire pilot group is on Ackerman's shoulders. He has much to prove and I'm sure he knows that.
The weight of the entire pilot group is primarily on the status reps. The status reps direct the MEC officers. Don't reverse it like Amongero did. There has been no change to the status reps. Stay calm, carry on.
Android is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 05:46 AM
  #11362  
Line holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Android
The weight of the entire pilot group is primarily on the status reps. The status reps direct the MEC officers. Don't reverse it like Amongero did. There has been no change to the status reps. Stay calm, carry on.
I'm familiar with how the ALPA structure works, as I've served at my previous carrier. There most likely will be changes to the status reps if some of the current status reps move into MEC leadership positions. Also, if the MEC chairman doesn't feel the weight of the pilot group on his shoulders, and enormous pressure to lead and get it right, than I have no confidence. I stand by my previous post.
MikeBerkowitz is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 06:00 AM
  #11363  
Line Holder
 
Android's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by MikeBerkowitz
I'm familiar with how the ALPA structure works, as I've served at my previous carrier. There most likely will be changes to the status reps if some of the current status reps move into MEC leadership positions. Also, if the MEC chairman doesn't feel the weight of the pilot group on his shoulders, and enormous pressure to lead and get it right, than I have no confidence. I stand by my previous post.
Well, let's put it like this. We all carry the weight of this pilot group on our shoulder together. Now that our voice is being heard, lets work together.
Android is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 07:02 AM
  #11364  
Line Holder
 
Stoutbrewer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by Android

Anyone that chooses to damage his chances for a new contract by attacking his MEC has no place on this board.
No attacking the MEC, no dissenting, just move on. If that isn't the dumbest thing I've heard today... You've been knifing the MEC in the back since you were lucky enough to get hired here.
Fact is you and your ilk already did the damage by executing the MEC over some trivial heartburn, according to the fast read. The real reason is more about power and vengeance I suspect. It's a clown move from the herb days, and we'll all pay even while you tell us it to move on, back the MEC, avert your gaze or whatever.
So run along, log into your other 5 screen names and keep stirring some stuff.
Stoutbrewer is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 07:51 AM
  #11365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gonyon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,432
Default

I can't help but be a little nervous about the timing on this. I have to say, however, that it seemed that outside of a small circle of guys, the old MEC leadership was not liked by most of the line guys. They were viewed as a "good ole boys" club which was not interested in communicating with the pilots. They were viewed as a group that thought of themselves as the "ruling class".

I suspect that small circle is going to rise up and fight this. I just hope this doesn't turn into a world class sh*t show that jeopardizes contract negotiations.
gonyon is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 07:52 AM
  #11366  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by Stoutbrewer
No attacking the MEC, no dissenting, just move on. If that isn't the dumbest thing I've heard today... You've been knifing the MEC in the back since you were lucky enough to get hired here.
Fact is you and your ilk already did the damage by executing the MEC over some trivial heartburn, according to the fast read. The real reason is more about power and vengeance I suspect. It's a clown move from the herb days, and we'll all pay even while you tell us it to move on, back the MEC, avert your gaze or whatever.
So run along, log into your other 5 screen names and keep stirring some stuff.

Nothing but the truth.
Poor timing, glimpse of the future what this mess is.
Sailor is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 08:58 AM
  #11367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Default

Honestly I haven't paid much attention to this but what exactly was so bad that they got kicked out for?
flyingpuma1 is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 08:59 AM
  #11368  
escaped
 
Jett i son's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Default

I think this change is positive, but too close to call yet.
This will show in the attitude of the NC in the coming months.
I prefer not to comment on the character of our reps, but rather on what they accomplish.
Did the recently recalled MEC officers support a negotiating plan which needed help?
The new MEC may have a more optimistic/aggressive view of what/how we should be negotiating.
We can do much better than focusing on +30% pay and keeping most rules!
What good does a quick signing do, if what we sign is a work in progress?
Anyone think we will do better in 5 years?
Job protection, retirement, must be addressed, before too late.

IF NOT NOW WHEN?
Jett i son is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 09:03 AM
  #11369  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 8
Default

What I learned on Tuesday at the MEC meeting:

Article 8 (Section 8?) proceedings to remove from office against Jim Ackerman (the new MEC Chairmen) for attempting to have Doug Poletti disciplined by taking the private conversations between him and a Doug to Spirit HR and the Chief Pilot's office (Chris Russing). How can we trust this guy who turned a pilot over to management?

Jason Leonard has been taping all phone conversations with members. Jesus, is that even legal?

The negotiating committee was consulted and specifically recommended against this course of action and supported the Council 18 rep position that the switch should be made at the next election cycle when Chris and Paul indicated they would not seek re-election.

No other committee chairmen were consulted.

The debate over the recall was moved to a closed session on a motion by Jim Ackerman and a party line vote by the status reps. This denied Chris and Paul the opportunity to defend against the accusations in front of the membership. Subsequently, the claims went un-substantiated since they were no longer in office.

They were recalled over not running meetings the right way and hurt feelings. The best interests of the pilot group were not considered.

Widespread belief that this will damage the negotiating committee in their effort to get us a contract. Bendo dancing a jig.

It appears that all of the pilots they had lined up to take the vice-chairmen and secretary-treasurer positions have declined the offer.

Didn't go on Wednesday.
NewA320Driver is offline  
Old 04-15-2015, 09:12 AM
  #11370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Airbus Left
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Android
Too bad De grenier and Hershon now labeled themselves as the minority in this issue. Now anything they say can be construed as divisiveness, and against the best interest of the pilots.
I'm sorry to be blunt, but this is about the dumbest thing I ever read on this board, Android. How clueless can you get?
Based on all your post here, you clearly have some hatred and hostility issues to work out for yourself.
For the rest of us, we support our reps no matter how they voted and we move on in a professional matter, communicating with our reps about how we want them to proceed. However, all of them will have their feet to the fire, explaining how this recall action was necessary at this time.
I am sure they have a rational explanation beyond what we have seen so far. But if they acted out of the sort of anger, hatred, vengeance that you display in your post, they won't last long.
Balder is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices