Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2015, 12:40 PM
  #11221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rainbows's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Low paid Airbus gear slinger
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Scope: spirit current or future flying shall always be done by spirit pilots from the spirit seniority list. None of that flying shall be outsourced, code shared, joint ventures, capacity purchased, etc. Spirit shall not create or acquire an alter ego airline to get around that language. In the event of a merger/acquisition/sale of or with spirit airlines then the surviving carrier shall have the same scope language or better and the pilots of both/all carriers shall be integrated through the Alpa seniority list integration policy and the new carrier(s) shall have only one seniority list. This shall apply to airlines and holding companies owning and/or operating an airline or airlines. This scope shall not be held hostage or used as an ultimatum to modify it as a condition of a transaction between spirit and another airline or hiking company

In other words: any revenue spirit airlines or any future airline or holding company generates through the carriage or people or goods by air shall only be done by pilots on the spirit seniority list and there shall always be only one seniority list.

Now put that in legalese and that's what I want.
Part of the reason is because we never gonna know whats going to happen. I don't think we'll see other pilots flying our routes like a regional but you never know. Plus anyone who believes the "we will never merge' talk is a fool. At some point in time we gonna merge it may be with frontier like everyone says or it may be with a legacy carrier but I bet its going to happen and we need protection of our seniority. I took the survey everyone else needs to.
Rainbows is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 02:16 PM
  #11222  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Yes, but to put out a survey and ignore all other issues doesn't make a lot of sense.

As for the scope question, I've seen several people on here mention that it needs work. I was just looking for some examples of what needs to be changed.
As well, my guess is that they have a few more surveys coming, different areas and all. Scope, Schedule, etc. All at once may be to much...?
Sailor is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 08:22 AM
  #11223  
escaped
 
Jett i son's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Default

I applaud the MEC for this.
These surveys are paramount in focusing on what is important.
I very much hope our membership dispels the myth that we would be fine with a quickie, by just adding some $$$.
Compensation should be well rounded, in the form of pay, retirement, profit sharing/stock options, contributions, and increased scheduling efficiency which would increase line value and days off.
Jett i son is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 10:16 AM
  #11224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Default

Originally Posted by Jett i son
I applaud the MEC for this.
These surveys are paramount in focusing on what is important.
I very much hope our membership dispels the myth that we would be fine with a quickie, by just adding some $$$.
Compensation should be well rounded, in the form of pay, retirement, profit sharing/stock options, contributions, and increased scheduling efficiency which would increase line value and days off.
Absolutely! I was talking with an FA the other who said the company is eager to get all the contracts finished up.....turns out they can't merge with open contracts..that should tell you something.
flyingpuma1 is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 11:04 AM
  #11225  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
Absolutely! I was talking with an FA the other who said the company is eager to get all the contracts finished up.....turns out they can't merge with open contracts..that should tell you something.
Sure they can look at AWA/USAIR......in addition, who are we going to merger with overnight, or in the next 4-5 years for the matter?
Hugedouche is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 11:26 AM
  #11226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Jett i son
I applaud the MEC for this.
These surveys are paramount in focusing on what is important.
I very much hope our membership dispels the myth that we would be fine with a quickie, by just adding some $$$.
Compensation should be well rounded, in the form of pay, retirement, profit sharing/stock options, contributions, and increased scheduling efficiency which would increase line value and days off.
That survey was nothing. It was like asking if you'd rather die in a hangman's noose or off of a snipers bullet.

Breaux, I think we been shafted again.
GeauxPro is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 11:29 AM
  #11227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Sailor
As well, my guess is that they have a few more surveys coming, different areas and all. Scope, Schedule, etc. All at once may be to much...?

Why publish more surveys? They have already decided what they intend to negotiate. They said as much in the letter they sent out about their "focus". For that matter, why send out the one they did?
GeauxPro is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 12:11 PM
  #11228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Default

Originally Posted by Hugedouche
Sure they can look at AWA/USAIR......in addition, who are we going to merger with overnight, or in the next 4-5 years for the matter?
I would guess Frontier
flyingpuma1 is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 02:18 PM
  #11229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rainbows's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Low paid Airbus gear slinger
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
I would guess Frontier
We could merge with anyone, frontier, allegiant, even alaska. Even a legacy carrier it don't matter. United and continental was a merger many didn't see coming as well as american and usair same as southwest and airtran. Southwest was suppose to buy frontier that didn't happen and they got bought by republic and then indigo anything can happen. The point is without protection we are sitting ducks like the airtran guys. One thing we can count on is we wont be buying anyone we are shedding and outsourcing our ground people. It makes a lot of sense for us to watch out for ourselves I think ALPA will do a decent job for us if it's any ALPA carrier, except maybe delta, but if it's American or southwest we are on our own. And protection doesn't cost the company a thing.
Rainbows is offline  
Old 04-05-2015, 04:23 PM
  #11230  
escaped
 
Jett i son's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
Absolutely! I was talking with an FA the other who said the company is eager to get all the contracts finished up.....turns out they can't merge with open contracts..that should tell you something.
Spot on flyingpuma1: they can't merge with open contracts

Open contracts are a liability, especially for a fast growing, stock market favorite, like our company.
We are an investor "darling", any uncertainty diminishes Spirit's market valuation.
This is key in negotiations.
We would be foolish to give away any of our advantages.
Time is on our side!

The MEC must get the message that we are willing to wait for the best possible outcome.

Last edited by Jett i son; 04-05-2015 at 04:53 PM.
Jett i son is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices