Spirit of NKS
Looks like someone's been drinking again.
From NKPilots forum: "Again, I will vote yes, but I hope it fails so as to serve a lesson to all about bad decision making. DP"
With that kind of leaders, we can not lose!
From NKPilots forum: "Again, I will vote yes, but I hope it fails so as to serve a lesson to all about bad decision making. DP"
With that kind of leaders, we can not lose!
"Processing" for nearly two hours now. Is this typical when DOT opens up every month?
I expected a bottleneck, but this is kinda ridiculous...
I expected a bottleneck, but this is kinda ridiculous...
It seems that working out deals with CS, has become the norm.
Reserve or open time assignment, leaves too much "choice" to supervisors to interpret rules in their favor.
The language needs to be explicit.
The passing of this LOA depends largely on inconvenience.
As a lifetime commuter, I fully understand that.
This possible inconvenience however, does not weigh over issues such as, staffing, compensation, schedule.
The company is not "sharing the wealth", which may be an indication of what's to come in the summer.
Let's take this opportunity to show our unity, and send a clear message that we vote on overall membership benefits, not short term personal gain.
At minimum, a counteroffer for bidding for those DL days, may be a start.
Those are work days and should be bid for.
PS: Not advocating that this improvement alone would be enough to pass.
Reserve or open time assignment, leaves too much "choice" to supervisors to interpret rules in their favor.
The language needs to be explicit.
The passing of this LOA depends largely on inconvenience.
As a lifetime commuter, I fully understand that.
This possible inconvenience however, does not weigh over issues such as, staffing, compensation, schedule.
The company is not "sharing the wealth", which may be an indication of what's to come in the summer.
Let's take this opportunity to show our unity, and send a clear message that we vote on overall membership benefits, not short term personal gain.
At minimum, a counteroffer for bidding for those DL days, may be a start.
Those are work days and should be bid for.
PS: Not advocating that this improvement alone would be enough to pass.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 320 Left soon middle
Posts: 488
The distance based learning will happen with or without any LOA. If anyone can point to any language in the CBA to prevent it, then make your case based on that.
Some pilots had higher credit in training months was because the company had "brick and Mortar" groundschools, run as a class, on dates certain, at a set location. The Ipads will negate the need to do this, LOA or not. Section 11.D.2 allows them to do home training in the current CBA, one day a month, for 4hrs of pay credit, with no restoration of days off even if you are at minimum days off. (this is what they did six years ago with "runway Incursion") They could do one day a month, and they have three months to work with, grace early, base, and grace late. And then they could have your PC contain one day of classroom GS that will complete the 25hr FAA requirement. So they could under current book do this as home study for a total of 8hrs pay. They prefer not to do this as they want a 27hr GS.
But they could still have you come in to your base to do GS for 4hrs of pay per day in the current CBA, and without the LOA this is what they plan to do. So there will be no travel to GS, because it is your domicile, no LOA required. If you are above min days off they could have you come in, at a day of their choosing, for 4hrs of pay, and no requirement to restore days off. To keep you at or above the 12.E.1 limits (min days off) they may do one day one month and one the next. (And total hell on your life if you are a commuter in the middle of a 4 day break) Or they could drop a trip, of their choosing, in a very efficient manner from their point of view, because with Ipad based training there is not a set classroom date, for Zero extra pay above line value. And they could do this right now, under current book, with no LOA. As a reminder, all time and hotel expense will be born by the pilot, because you are simply being told to report to your domicile.
I'm not so sure that I would agree to the LOA if I were Spirit management. The pain they could impose on us would be significant enough, for commuters which I'm not, that we would have to burn negotiating capital in the next CBA just to achieve this LOA.
You have to know your hand, and play your hand. But our hand is not an unknown. Its straight forward in the CBA, and Spirit management knows it. It is not as if voting NO will stop the DBL from coming, they could do this without the LOA, perhaps for less money, and not have this as a sore spot of an issue that ALPA would be forced to address in the future CBA negotiations.
Yes the company is getting a big savings, but not because of any LOA, but for the Ipad's ability to have "virtual GS" at a time and place of their choosing. And make no mistake, with no LOA, you will be traveling to your domicile, on your dime and time, for training, for at best 8hrs above line value and in the case of a dropped two day, no extra pay whatsoever.
Again, I will vote YES, but I hope it fails so as to serve as a lesson to all about bad decision making.
Some pilots had higher credit in training months was because the company had "brick and Mortar" groundschools, run as a class, on dates certain, at a set location. The Ipads will negate the need to do this, LOA or not. Section 11.D.2 allows them to do home training in the current CBA, one day a month, for 4hrs of pay credit, with no restoration of days off even if you are at minimum days off. (this is what they did six years ago with "runway Incursion") They could do one day a month, and they have three months to work with, grace early, base, and grace late. And then they could have your PC contain one day of classroom GS that will complete the 25hr FAA requirement. So they could under current book do this as home study for a total of 8hrs pay. They prefer not to do this as they want a 27hr GS.
But they could still have you come in to your base to do GS for 4hrs of pay per day in the current CBA, and without the LOA this is what they plan to do. So there will be no travel to GS, because it is your domicile, no LOA required. If you are above min days off they could have you come in, at a day of their choosing, for 4hrs of pay, and no requirement to restore days off. To keep you at or above the 12.E.1 limits (min days off) they may do one day one month and one the next. (And total hell on your life if you are a commuter in the middle of a 4 day break) Or they could drop a trip, of their choosing, in a very efficient manner from their point of view, because with Ipad based training there is not a set classroom date, for Zero extra pay above line value. And they could do this right now, under current book, with no LOA. As a reminder, all time and hotel expense will be born by the pilot, because you are simply being told to report to your domicile.
I'm not so sure that I would agree to the LOA if I were Spirit management. The pain they could impose on us would be significant enough, for commuters which I'm not, that we would have to burn negotiating capital in the next CBA just to achieve this LOA.
You have to know your hand, and play your hand. But our hand is not an unknown. Its straight forward in the CBA, and Spirit management knows it. It is not as if voting NO will stop the DBL from coming, they could do this without the LOA, perhaps for less money, and not have this as a sore spot of an issue that ALPA would be forced to address in the future CBA negotiations.
Yes the company is getting a big savings, but not because of any LOA, but for the Ipad's ability to have "virtual GS" at a time and place of their choosing. And make no mistake, with no LOA, you will be traveling to your domicile, on your dime and time, for training, for at best 8hrs above line value and in the case of a dropped two day, no extra pay whatsoever.
Again, I will vote YES, but I hope it fails so as to serve as a lesson to all about bad decision making.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 163
I don't think that's true. If they bring us to a classroom under ground training rules then we are protected for min days off just as we are now for recurrent and sim training. They can't use home training rules for recurrent because home training specifically forbids them from making us study company manuals. Kind of hard do recurrent without studying manuals.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 163
BTW my time is important to me. I'm voting no.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: A320 captain
Posts: 209
Training, no matter the location, takes time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post