Search

Notices

Spirit Airlines Ch.11

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2024, 09:05 PM
  #621  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,345
Default

1. Poaching is not illegal

2. There are no airline HQ nor HR flagpoles in CA. Again, poaching is not illegal anywhere, not in CA either

3. FTC is TRADE commission, they protect consumers
hercretired is offline  
Old Yesterday, 03:41 AM
  #622  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 233
Default

Seems there is room for reasonable people to argue about what conduct might be illegal and whether the enforcement mechanism for such is robust enough to matter.

As for whether Spirit pilots will want to leave - there are quite a few Pan AM, Braniff, Eastern and probably even TWA pilots who would suggest taking a chance. They don't have to take them all. A majority (or even a significant minority quickly enough) would cause chaos.
VacancyBid is offline  
Old Yesterday, 05:54 AM
  #623  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,249
Default

Originally Posted by NotTHATJoker
i ve not researched (and am too lazy to) but would suggest arguing typed pilots have some special value would not be persuasive, since every new pilot joining spirit gets the same spirit-specific, FAA-approved training - so they could replace departing pilots with pilots from the regionals or other sources and have to train them, just like every other carrier

no hiring carrier gets to save training costs and has to run nk bus pilots thru their programs too...it isn't like the hiring company saves $

doubt very much just the fact of hiring pilots (like or not we are more like a commodity in this context than a key employee like a c-level exec or someone with inside proprietary knowledge)

so the whole "hiring pilots away" as a claim idea is not viable imho

of course really really bad conduct by a competitor might be enough to state a claim but no one has alleged any such intent much less identified some
Not saying there's a huge direct economic benefit to hiring typed pilots but if you were looking for a smokescreen excuse to cover other motives, you can argue that typed pilots will have a statistically higher success rate in training. That's a known thing and regionals have obviously prefered other regional pilots over CFI's for that reason.

You can also argue that operational experience on type enhances safety, and that is also true if you get into the very fringes of statistics. Very hard to quantify in $ terms but there's an obvious grain of truth if you were looking to score debate points.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 05:57 AM
  #624  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,249
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
1. Poaching is not illegal

2. There are no airline HQ nor HR flagpoles in CA. Again, poaching is not illegal anywhere, not in CA either
Raiding is not the same as poaching, poach all you like, that's fine.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 06:01 AM
  #625  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,249
Default

Originally Posted by VacancyBid
Seems there is room for reasonable people to argue about what conduct might be illegal and whether the enforcement mechanism for such is robust enough to matter.
Yes, it's very situationally dependent and likely location (state) dependent.

But you can't make an absolute statement that any company can target any other for staff raiding, with the primary intent of harming them economically. It's happened before and laws have been pased in at least some places.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:09 AM
  #626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,345
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Raiding is not the same as poaching, poach all you like, that's fine.
That is correct. Any posts that imply poaching is illegal are incorrect.

No airlines are engaged in "raiding." If you believe otherwise, please post an example, with the attached supporting documentation where a court determined raiding occurred.

hercretired is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:22 AM
  #627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 354
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
That is correct. Any posts that imply poaching is illegal are incorrect.

No airlines are engaged in "raiding." If you believe otherwise, please post an example, with the attached supporting documentation where a court determined raiding occurred.
When someone can prove United, Delta, American or Southwest started calling their pilots recruiting them then maybe, but if NK pilots just apply on their own at other carriers and get hired there is zero chance this is anti competitive. Even if those airlines hired NK pilots exclusively there is nothing anti-competitive about that either.
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:43 AM
  #628  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,274
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
1. Poaching is not illegal

2. There are no airline HQ nor HR flagpoles in CA. Again, poaching is not illegal anywhere, not in CA either

3. FTC is TRADE commission, they protect consumers
Let’s get a petition going for Spirit Airlines pilots get the same status of elephants and Rino’s.

https://www.change.org/start-a-petition

#StopSpiritPilotPaoching #YellowPilotLivesMatters
#Endthecruelty

Halon1211 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:45 AM
  #629  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,274
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
Let’s get a petition going for Spirit Airlines pilots get the same status of elephants and Rino’s.

https://www.change.org/start-a-petition

#StopSpiritPilotPaoching #YellowPilotLivesMatters
#Endthecruelty
what are you guys think of this soundtrack to go with the commercial I’m gonna make for it?

https://youtu.be/9gspElv1yvc?si=jU9oKdGnhUv97KU8
Halon1211 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 10:26 AM
  #630  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,249
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
That is correct. Any posts that imply poaching is illegal are incorrect.

No airlines are engaged in "raiding." If you believe otherwise, please post an example, with the attached supporting documentation where a court determined raiding occurred.
No I don't think any airlines are raiding. The whole discussion came out of somebody speculating that it *might* happen to NK. Which I think is very unlikely for a few reasons.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
AirBear
Major
0
04-14-2020 03:25 PM
Sailor
Spirit
14117
10-09-2015 07:55 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
taylorjets
Major
2
03-19-2008 05:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices