Search

Notices

Spirit Airlines Ch.11

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2024, 03:57 PM
  #421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,548
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
https://viewfromthewing.com/spirit-airlines-goes-off-the-rails-charging-more-for-first-class-than-delta-and-american-without-the-perks
/

thoughts?

I personally don’t really see Spirit really caring about this because this is just a cover to make it look like they’re in LCC now to set up better for merger.
Bullsnot. I looked up First/Mint/Go Big LAX-New York area for September 15 return the 21st.

United First: 7am LAX departure 1130am return (to/from Newark) $5757
jetBlue Mint: 6am LAX departure 11am return (to/from JFK) $2496
Spirit Go Big: 530am LAX departure 1215pm return (to/from Newark) $676 (rounded up)
Tranquility is offline  
Old 08-21-2024, 05:26 PM
  #422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
I don't know, how do you Block JB/NK from merging and allow AK to buy a second airline in a decade? Nothing makes sense........
To answer YOUR question. Probably the same way you compare apples to oranges. Sounds like you weren’t well versed on the law, the reason for the denial, or the details specifically pertaining to the AK/HA merge. Hint: HA flies to a total of 31 destinations and holds approximately 50 aircraft. 2 legacy airlines merging into sparsely populated markets, has no real economic effect on the customer. Hence why the same exact DOJ that sued and went to court for the NK/B6 merger, did not, in this case.

It’s over man. What’s done is done. Time to move on. Nothing will ever change with what happened.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 08-21-2024, 05:53 PM
  #423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
To answer YOUR question. Probably the same way you compare apples to oranges. Sounds like you weren’t well versed on the law, the reason for the denial, or the details specifically pertaining to the AK/HA merge. Hint: HA flies to a total of 31 destinations and holds approximately 50 aircraft. 2 legacy airlines merging into sparsely populated markets, has no real economic effect on the customer. Hence why the same exact DOJ that sued and went to court for the NK/B6 merger, did not, in this case.

It’s over man. What’s done is done. Time to move on. Nothing will ever change with what happened.
I’m starting to think this is Judge Young’s burner account.
BKbigfish is offline  
Old 08-21-2024, 05:57 PM
  #424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Gov subsidized airline?

Obama planes?
I don't think any of the big three, and probably southwest as well, would be allowed to fail. the commercial air traffic from those geographic areas would be decimated and it would take at least a couple years for those areas to get it back - assuming a quick liquidation event that would only make the surviving three airlines even bigger and stronger.

I think we witnessed with covid the power of the big four. they had both sides of the aisle bending over backwards to subsidize the entire industry. big labor and big business combined with local governments fighting tooth and nail to maintain air service and connectivity. If say AA were to "fail" and actually have to liquidate, who would buy up their assets? It would likely be DAL and UAL buying the majority of the assets because the business models and economy of scales are so similar. Then you'd have two legacy airlines controlling over half the market.

Governement would bail out one of the legacies again before they would be allowed to liquidate. Restructure the debt, sure that could easily happen. But a true liquidation would not be allowed in my opinion.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 08-21-2024, 06:41 PM
  #425  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,520
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
To answer YOUR question. Probably the same way you compare apples to oranges. Sounds like you weren’t well versed on the law, the reason for the denial, or the details specifically pertaining to the AK/HA merge. Hint: HA flies to a total of 31 destinations and holds approximately 50 aircraft. 2 legacy airlines merging into sparsely populated markets, has no real economic effect on the customer. Hence why the same exact DOJ that sued and went to court for the NK/B6 merger, did not, in this case.

It’s over man. What’s done is done. Time to move on. Nothing will ever change with what happened.
I am moving on, waiting for a class date. Thanks for your concern and free lesson on the US Judicial system.
Chimpy is online now  
Old 08-21-2024, 06:50 PM
  #426  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
I don't think any of the big three, and probably southwest as well, would be allowed to fail. the commercial air traffic from those geographic areas would be decimated and it would take at least a couple years for those areas to get it back - assuming a quick liquidation event that would only make the surviving three airlines even bigger and stronger.

I think we witnessed with covid the power of the big four. they had both sides of the aisle bending over backwards to subsidize the entire industry. big labor and big business combined with local governments fighting tooth and nail to maintain air service and connectivity. If say AA were to "fail" and actually have to liquidate, who would buy up their assets? It would likely be DAL and UAL buying the majority of the assets because the business models and economy of scales are so similar. Then you'd have two legacy airlines controlling over half the market.

Governement would bail out one of the legacies again before they would be allowed to liquidate. Restructure the debt, sure that could easily happen. But a true liquidation would not be allowed in my opinion.
It seems the government is hell bent on establishing some sort of a ULCC segment. The road to establishing it seems to be known by Spirit management, because Ted hasn’t been fired. Harris is running on price controls. This ain’t your daddy’s econ 101 anymore.
CatPilot1 is offline  
Old 08-21-2024, 08:55 PM
  #427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ed Force One's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 721
Default

Originally Posted by CatPilot1
It seems the government is hell bent on establishing some sort of a ULCC segment. The road to establishing it seems to be known by Spirit management, because Ted hasn’t been fired. Harris is running on price controls. This ain’t your daddy’s econ 101 anymore.
So Spirit becomes Essential Air Service? But to an underserved Class rather than city?
Ed Force One is offline  
Old 08-22-2024, 05:31 AM
  #428  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
So Spirit becomes Essential Air Service? But to an underserved Class rather than city?
It’s alteady done with housing, food, and health. I guess air travel is next.
CatPilot1 is offline  
Old 08-22-2024, 07:42 AM
  #429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by CatPilot1
It’s alteady done with housing, food, and health. I guess air travel is next.
https://progressivegrocer.com/city-o...coming-chicago
CatPilot1 is offline  
Old 08-23-2024, 12:11 PM
  #430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,466
Default

FUUUH, could you imagine? 🤣
putzin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 10:35 AM
AirBear
Major
0
04-14-2020 03:25 PM
Sailor
Spirit
14117
10-09-2015 07:55 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
taylorjets
Major
2
03-19-2008 05:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices