Spirit Airlines Ch.11
#401
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 858
Oh it’s managements fault we are where we are but it’ll be the governments fault if we ultimately all end up losing our jobs bc the merger would’ve prevented that
#402
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,593
Their hubris is what prevented the merger.
#403
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,319
Spirit obviously has some serious financial issues to deal with, but things aren't all that great at JB either. They haven't turned a profit in quite a while and seem to be scaling back in some markets. Would the merger have been a magic pill allowing the combined company to flourish or just a Hail Mary pass for saving jobs since without one Spirit could potentially be in real trouble?
#404
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 77
I'd even argue some of the truly dumb arguments JetBlue lawyers made (like posting a slide basically affirming they were planning to screw the public) were intentional to scuttle the whole thing. They knew the deal was bad and getting worse by the minute. The terms of the merger were pretty air tight and so getting the judge to throw it all out was likely the best option, penalties and all.
Obvioulsly there's no telling right now how this story will end. I just think simply assuming everything would be hunky-dory had only the goverment not blocked the merger is an easy cop out to distract from Spirit's very real issues.
#405
I think it's a fantasy to think the merger would have somehow fixed everything wrong with Spirit (and JetBlue). Considering the current state of affairs had the merger been approved, Spirit could just as easily sink JetBlue right along with them.
I'd even argue some of the truly dumb arguments JetBlue lawyers made (like posting a slide basically affirming they were planning to screw the public) were intentional to scuttle the whole thing. They knew the deal was bad and getting worse by the minute. The terms of the merger were pretty air tight and so getting the judge to throw it all out was likely the best option, penalties and all.
Obvioulsly there's no telling right now how this story will end. I just think simply assuming everything would be hunky-dory had only the goverment not blocked the merger is an easy cop out to distract from Spirit's very real issues.
I'd even argue some of the truly dumb arguments JetBlue lawyers made (like posting a slide basically affirming they were planning to screw the public) were intentional to scuttle the whole thing. They knew the deal was bad and getting worse by the minute. The terms of the merger were pretty air tight and so getting the judge to throw it all out was likely the best option, penalties and all.
Obvioulsly there's no telling right now how this story will end. I just think simply assuming everything would be hunky-dory had only the goverment not blocked the merger is an easy cop out to distract from Spirit's very real issues.
I also believe that this was a cockblock move against Frontier from acquiring JetBlue. JetBlue couldn’t afford to allow Frontier to take on Spirit and compete against a Frontier/Spirit combined ULCC and AA, DL, UA, WN, AS. at the same time with Breeze and Avelo trying to come up from underneath…,
#406
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 858
Spirit obviously has some serious financial issues to deal with, but things aren't all that great at JB either. They haven't turned a profit in quite a while and seem to be scaling back in some markets. Would the merger have been a magic pill allowing the combined company to flourish or just a Hail Mary pass for saving jobs since without one Spirit could potentially be in real trouble?
#407
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,319
One quarter here and there doesn't define a successful operation. You have to look at annual returns. I also don't believe that any company is too big to fail. Regardless of the size of the company, consistently putting up negative year end numbers will result in failure.
#408
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 166
.
One quarter here and there doesn't define a successful operation. You have to look at annual returns. I also don't believe that any company is too big to fail. Regardless of the size of the company, consistently putting up negative year end numbers will result in failure.
One quarter here and there doesn't define a successful operation. You have to look at annual returns. I also don't believe that any company is too big to fail. Regardless of the size of the company, consistently putting up negative year end numbers will result in failure.
filler
#409
.
One quarter here and there doesn't define a successful operation. You have to look at annual returns. I also don't believe that any company is too big to fail. Regardless of the size of the company, consistently putting up negative year end numbers will result in failure.
One quarter here and there doesn't define a successful operation. You have to look at annual returns. I also don't believe that any company is too big to fail. Regardless of the size of the company, consistently putting up negative year end numbers will result in failure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post