Search

Notices

The plan going forward

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2024, 03:38 PM
  #121  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,059
Default

Originally Posted by nene
When/if they file BK, the BK judge will be assigned and a creditors committee will be formed. Then if the company mgmt can form a viable plan considering labor/equip/facilities going forward, they will make a plan to submit to the committee/judge which may include things like forced labor contract changes, lease changes, etc. The committee can also consider other offers by 3rd parties to buy assets and/or just proceed with liquidation. It's up to the committee and judge which path is most viable and labor/smaller creditors are mostly along for the ride. Of course politics/money/influence all have huge stakes in the process.

It's not good for anyone, especially labor and if nothing else, is actually very expensive because the many lawyers involved get PAID BANK!
Worth noting that BK companies, even if allowed to reject/modify a CBA do not get carte blanche. Typically the judge will impose an "industry average" contract, although if it were necessary to make the numbers work in the reorganization proposal the court might cut deeper. In this case the company would argue for the average of the ULCC industry (SY, F9, G4, Breeze, Avelo), not the average of DL, UA, AA, and SW.

Courts seem to like snap-back provisions, so you might suck it up for a while and then get some or all of the original contract back after things turn around post-BK.

Also the company has to jump through some hoops before it can even go there with a CBA, and that would take at least some amount of time (11 USC 1113). If the company starts trying to negotiate a concessionary CBA that's a good sign that Ch.11 is right around the corner.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-17-2024, 09:02 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 839
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Worth noting that BK companies, even if allowed to reject/modify a CBA do not get carte blanche. Typically the judge will impose an "industry average" contract, although if it were necessary to make the numbers work in the reorganization proposal the court might cut deeper. In this case the company would argue for the average of the ULCC industry (SY, F9, G4, Breeze, Avelo), not the average of DL, UA, AA, and SW.

Courts seem to like snap-back provisions, so you might suck it up for a while and then get some or all of the original contract back after things turn around post-BK.

Also the company has to jump through some hoops before it can even go there with a CBA, and that would take at least some amount of time (11 USC 1113). If the company starts trying to negotiate a concessionary CBA that's a good sign that Ch.11 is right around the corner.
Are we even technically going to be a ULCC when we start offering these full service fares come fall?
Lincoln Osiris is offline  
Old 06-17-2024, 01:29 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Are we even technically going to be a ULCC when we start offering these full service fares come fall?
Is that confirmed? I was suspecting it was just another flight deck rumour with no substance.
checkgear is offline  
Old 06-17-2024, 03:56 PM
  #124  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,059
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Are we even technically going to be a ULCC when we start offering these full service fares come fall?
I would say LCC/National carrier, assuming industry-comparable price-points. Can't claim legacy-equivalent status without hub-and-spoke, international, and regional flying.

But that's not what they'll argue for the judge... it will be ULCC all the way, which is true at that moment in time.

As I mentioned, snap-back clauses are common and not terribly unreasonable.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 12:43 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,522
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I would say LCC/National carrier, assuming industry-comparable price-points. Can't claim legacy-equivalent status without hub-and-spoke, international, and regional flying.

But that's not what they'll argue for the judge... it will be ULCC all the way, which is true at that moment in time.

As I mentioned, snap-back clauses are common and not terribly unreasonable.
question then becomes it it’ll he worth it to stick around for a NK/F9 merger. A year ago I was a lot more enthusiastic than I would be now. Problem is seniority is a helluva drug, lol
Chimpy is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 06:34 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 503
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
question then becomes it it’ll he worth it to stick around for a NK/F9 merger. A year ago I was a lot more enthusiastic than I would be now. Problem is seniority is a helluva drug, lol
Came to conclusion its not worth it. The uncertainty and whats attached with ch11 is not worth staying anymore.
8JRMfortheyear is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 08:20 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,904
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Also airlines can't get anywhere near zero... the FAA will yank their cert due to the very obvious safety ramifications of being that broke. So Ch.7 for airlines is some number above zero.
In theory, yes. In reality, depending on the carrier, the Feds give a tremendous amount of lattitude on this. I've seen utterly bankrupt, shoe string operators lurch from day to day with nothing more than change they found in the crew lounge couch.

In the end, there's usually one big triggering event...pop an engine, put a wheel in the dirt, or some random contractor or airport that gets tired of waiting for their money and boots a plane(s). Everyone else freaks and does the same because they think they'll get left out. Then the game is over, and the end comes surprisingly fast.

It also depends on how financially savvy the operating management its. Sometimes the operation gets away from them and they just pull the plug. Braniff (the original) had something like 60 days of pre-paid fuel on the books when their clueless management pulled the plug.

That being said, my guess is they're smart enough here to thread the needle.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:57 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hugh Betcha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 157
Default

Is ULCC even a word? I thought Ben B. made it up in a late 2005 during an all company meeting when he coined "unbundeling"? Slang that eventually made it into the dictionary when it was used enough? Got the idea from Ryanair?
Hugh Betcha is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 02:50 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,892
Default

Originally Posted by Hugh Betcha
Is ULCC even a word? I thought Ben B. made it up in a late 2005 during an all company meeting when he coined "unbundeling"? Slang that eventually made it into the dictionary when it was used enough? Got the idea from Ryanair?
Well for years there were SWA, and other defunct places like Skybus, and Airtran that were known as LCC's. When Spirit and now Frontier tried to go with the "unbundeling" of fares and replicate the ultra low fares of Europe (at least to advertise), then it seemed that the LCC needed a new tier of representation.
nene is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 04:27 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 343
Default

Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
Came to conclusion its not worth it. The uncertainty and whats attached with ch11 is not worth staying anymore.
Nice story. Buh Byeeeee!
CatPilot1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nightflyer
FedEx
15
07-04-2023 02:58 AM
TonyC
FedEx
243
06-13-2022 11:27 AM
iaflyer
Delta
254
05-22-2019 08:22 AM
EWRflyr
United
1
01-07-2012 09:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices