Search

Notices

JetBlue merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2023, 05:19 PM
  #361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Read your own post again knowing that JB did attempt to negotiate with the DOJ.

Then maybe look at the last 3 years of the DOJ opposing mergers left and right(and losing repeatedly).

Then go ask yourself if you take them at their word that they want to try and get new case laws in the books. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/0...rgers-00106970

Then ask yourself again why the DOJ is taking this one all the way to court.(not JB). The DOJ just said last month there was “no divestiture” that would remedy this merger. Its political.

Not challenging what you know / heard but I can only go on what I see. Playing the politics card is simply opinion. In which you are certainly entitled too. Im glad we all get to have one. Seriously though, what do you have that is fact based and shows that JBU has made good on all points to satisfy the complaint by the DOJ? I’m sincerely curious. Couldn’t find much but speculation and people throwing around 5th hand information.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 10-22-2023, 05:50 PM
  #362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,548
Default

Originally Posted by Brian3613
I live in Fort Lauderdale, and would love to be based in FLL. Currently, I’m told FLL is a junior base at Spirit. Does anyone know if that will change if them Merger goes through?
Go to American. Miami is junior and you have the option of widebody flying there as well….
Tranquility is offline  
Old 10-22-2023, 05:55 PM
  #363  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
The only issue with this is that the DOJ does not approve or allow mergers to happen. The interpretation of the law in question is the judge hearing the case. The FTC and CPA are charged with drafting a legal complaint to initiate a court hearing. They alone cannot block crap. Have you read the original reasons as to why the DOJ had beef with the big three in the first place. Then the resolution to the complaint? They all conceded to what appears to be the satisfaction of DOJ.

Ask yourself why JBU has not done so in this case? Why they’ve wasted all this time waiting for this elusive hearing that seems to never be happening. It’s like they are buying time for something.
On the one hand you say the DOJ doesn't allow mergers to happen, but your initial post said that the government settled with virtually all previous airline mergers prior to court date. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think you are only able to see one side of the coin here.

JB has made significant divesture commitments, and is proposing to merge and become the FIFTH largest airline in the country. The government has previously settled prior to court to allow the LARGEST airline in the world. And the number 2 and 3. In your own post you stated that the government has previously settled prior to court nearly every proposed airline merger in recent history. The fact that the government will not settle this one, which will create a very small company relatively speaking, really does show how political this is.

You have been opposed to this merger from the beginning, correct me if I'm wrong. So you see ulterior motives on the part of JB, which most others simply do not see.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-22-2023, 06:47 PM
  #364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
On the one hand you say the DOJ doesn't allow mergers to happen, but your initial post said that the government settled with virtually all previous airline mergers prior to court date. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think you are only able to see one side of the coin here.

Me thinks you read that wrong. I’m saying that it’s not the DOJs call. They cannot “approve” nor “deny” a merger. The only reason I say that is because people are posting as if they CAN. In which they CANNOT. Make sense?

I’m opposed to simple pilots that don’t live in the world of the 2%, who have something to lose when a case like this is on the line. I support law enforcement all around and don’t play the “they’re just biased against whatever it is that threatens my goals in life” card. Whoever it be that wants to merge, it’s not about me, it’s about the bigger picture. As simple as that.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 10-22-2023, 07:27 PM
  #365  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,114
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
Me thinks you read that wrong. I’m saying that it’s not the DOJs call. They cannot “approve” nor “deny” a merger. The only reason I say that is because people are posting as if they CAN. In which they CANNOT. Make sense?

I’m opposed to simple pilots that don’t live in the world of the 2%, who have something to lose when a case like this is on the line. I support law enforcement all around and don’t play the “they’re just biased against whatever it is that threatens my goals in life” card. Whoever it be that wants to merge, it’s not about me, it’s about the bigger picture. As simple as that.
Just because someone’s paranoid doesn’t mean that someone ISN’T out to get them.

But you are correct about this being about the judge. And if the Supreme Court actually does reverse it’s precedent if Chevron Deference, perhaps we can rein in some of the stupid things alphabet agencies have been doing for decades now,
Excargodog is online now  
Old 10-22-2023, 07:28 PM
  #366  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
Me thinks you read that wrong. I’m saying that it’s not the DOJs call. They cannot “approve” nor “deny” a merger. The only reason I say that is because people are posting as if they CAN. In which they CANNOT. Make sense?

I’m opposed to simple pilots that don’t live in the world of the 2%, who have something to lose when a case like this is on the line. I support law enforcement all around and don’t play the “they’re just biased against whatever it is that threatens my goals in life” card. Whoever it be that wants to merge, it’s not about me, it’s about the bigger picture. As simple as that.
YOU said the DOJ sued to block all those previous mergers, but SETTLED prior to the court hearings. So they DID approve those mergers, via a settlement. They settled virtually ALL of them. Yet they aren't settling this one.

I honestly enjoy intelligent debates, but you can't even seem to make sense of your own posts, within your own posts. This DOJ opposition is far more fierce than in previous airline mergers, even though this merger is far less consequential. It is CLEARLY political and ideological. Not in the fact that they brought the case in the first place, that is expected. But in the fact that not only have they not settled, but have openly said they will not settle, that there is no divesture that would make them settle this merger, even though this merger COMBINED will create a small player among giants.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-22-2023, 07:30 PM
  #367  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Just because someone’s paranoid doesn’t mean that someone ISN’T out to get them.

But you are correct about this being about the judge. And if the Supreme Court actually does reverse it’s precedent if Chevron Deference, perhaps we can rein in some of the stupid things alphabet agencies have been doing for decades now,
He's NOT correct that this comes down to the judge. Maybe in this case it will, but by his own admission the DOJ itself has settled nearly all previous mergers PRIOR to the court hearings. If it comes down to the judge in this case, it's only because the DOJ refused to settle, for what is clearly political/ideological reasons.

He can't have it both ways.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 03:10 AM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BananaHammock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Haha. It will 100% change. It will be senior, could become bad if the new company has to divest to the point of displacing positions.
B6 MCO Airbus used to be 7 years, guy from my alma mater is holding it now in 2 years, so no one really knows what it will look like
BananaHammock is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 04:37 AM
  #369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Haha. It will 100% change. It will be senior, could become bad if the new company has to divest to the point of displacing positions.
100% change as in expand more than Nk+B6 current presence? If the merger goes through, B6 has contracts to honor with FL government. The plan is to grow FLL to 250 departure per day and MCO to 200 departures per day. That's more than what NK and B6 fly outta those bases today. We currently have 65 departures daily (I believe we use to have a little more before they cut it back). Add that to NKs departures and you can see how many more departures will be added over the years, by 2027

Also, the last annual bid made both of those bases more junior. FLL is already in newhire classes because of it. So I wouldn't say it will be senior, far from it.
Bgood is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 06:05 AM
  #370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
Me thinks you read that wrong. I’m saying that it’s not the DOJs call. They cannot “approve” nor “deny” a merger. The only reason I say that is because people are posting as if they CAN. In which they CANNOT. Make sense?

I’m opposed to simple pilots that don’t live in the world of the 2%, who have something to lose when a case like this is on the line. I support law enforcement all around and don’t play the “they’re just biased against whatever it is that threatens my goals in life” card. Whoever it be that wants to merge, it’s not about me, it’s about the bigger picture. As simple as that.
The DOJ can chose not to sue to block the merger. Like you don’t technically approve your neighbor’s new fence, but you can decide not take them to court over it.

The tweet from MSG a few pages ago in this thread (post #352), shows how politically motivated this case is. If politicians actually meant what they are saying, they’d be trying to break up the #1, 2 and 3 airlines that already dominate the industry.
todd1200 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
cactiboss
American
271
06-12-2015 04:04 PM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices