Search

Notices

JetBlue merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2023, 03:02 PM
  #311  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,966
Default

Originally Posted by Directautogroup
  • Spirit is in trouble financially
  • Spirit won't be up front about how much trouble is related to NEO engine problems
  • Spirit won't explain why they are reducing hiring and upgrades
  • Spirit cannot afford to pay pilots any more money. See bullet point one
Why do people think this isn’t info already released in stock filings? You think the company called in the MEC in and said “hey, we like you, let us give you the inside scoop and make sure you don’t immediately send out an email about it to the pilots (wink wink)”. Maybe some don’t pay attention until it’s literally sent in an email with all the scary undertones.

This info has been available for a while now, filed with the SEC, revised guidance for everyone to feast on
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 03:02 PM
  #312  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,026
Default

I don’t think we see voluntary leaves offered at this point. What incentive does Ted and Co have to do so? Engine issues are to last through 2025 at the earliest so the costs of having to spool up training for recalled furloughs won’t be his problem to deal with. In this case it’s cheaper to furlough. Floodgates about to open.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 03:33 PM
  #313  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,966
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
I don’t think we see voluntary leaves offered at this point. What incentive does Ted and Co have to do so? Engine issues are to last through 2025 at the earliest so the costs of having to spool up training for recalled furloughs won’t be his problem to deal with. In this case it’s cheaper to furlough. Floodgates about to open.

I suppose it comes down to how much say Robin has in the operations at NK. Will Robin not mind if Ted lays off his soon to be workforce? I guess that depends on Robin’s control as the “silent hand” over Ted

I do know we saw this before in 2020. WARN letters were ready to go out, MEC made a deal to keep majority of pilots via leaves, they went back to the table to “save” the rest of the pilots from WARN letters, and many of us enjoyed nice paid time off.

Now that was an airborne virus that crippled the airline industry, this is the grounding of our NEO planes. I could argue one is neither worse or more worse than the other, but I’ve seen this before. Once WARN letters hit mailboxes, we can discuss the possible furloughs, until then, we shall see.

This is a nice eye opener for those new to the industry. The airline industry will kick you in the nuts when you’re not expecting it. It isn’t all sunshine and new contracts. Learn to deal with it and worry about it when it actually becomes something to worry about.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 03:40 PM
  #314  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
I suppose it comes down to how much say Robin has in the operations at NK. Will Robin not mind if Ted lays off his soon to be workforce? I guess that depends on Robin’s control as the “silent hand” over Ted

I do know we saw this before in 2020. WARN letters were ready to go out, MEC made a deal to keep majority of pilots via leaves, they went back to the table to “save” the rest of the pilots from WARN letters, and many of us enjoyed nice paid time off.

Now that was an airborne virus that crippled the airline industry, this is the grounding of our NEO planes. I could argue one is neither worse or more worse than the other, but I’ve seen this before. Once WARN letters hit mailboxes, we can discuss the possible furloughs, until then, we shall see.

This is a nice eye opener for those new to the industry. The airline industry will kick you in the nuts when you’re not expecting it. It isn’t all sunshine and new contracts. Learn to deal with it and worry about it when it actually becomes something to worry about.
Sure but this is different. This issue has an end date; Covid did not.

JB is going to retire the 190s and has to deal with the engine issue in their planes as well as ours. Don’t think a lack of pilots is a concern of RHs right now.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 03:42 PM
  #315  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
I don’t think we see voluntary leaves offered at this point. What incentive does Ted and Co have to do so? Engine issues are to last through 2025 at the earliest so the costs of having to spool up training for recalled furloughs won’t be his problem to deal with. In this case it’s cheaper to furlough. Floodgates about to open.
Ted and Co don’t have a crystal ball.

What wakes them up in a cold sweat at night is the thought that this merger doesn’t go through and they have to roll up their sleeves and sort this mess out alone instead of running off with millions. Some here would have you think a failed B6 merger would mean we jump right back into an F9 deal, as if the DOJ’s anti-merger crusade will suddenly disappear as long as it’s two ULCCs combining. That’s not going to be a very well capitalized adventure with both companies having the same issues currently.

Even if the court decision doesn’t go our way in the next few weeks, B6 has sunk too much money into the deal to not appeal it, which takes time. In the interim, the gang down in Miramar have to keep the operation afloat. Who knows what kind of supply chain issues Pratt&Whit may have, what domestic demand will do in 2024, what new conflicts in the Middle East could do to oil prices. At some point down the road, offering VIL’s can buy time and free up some cash.

How even more convenient if that coincides with us opening up section 6 and getting spooked into a concessionary contract. Bah… we’ll get ‘em next time
RemoveB4flght is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 04:37 PM
  #316  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 512
Default

Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
Side show or not, I don’t think we’d be profitable with fuel costs and our current economic situation. Frontier is predicting a loss and they are smaller (better for ULCC’s) with more more efficiency in pilot work rules and lower labor costs. No incentive for them to show a loss. Pilot attrition is not a concern if we are talking about VIL’s. Why in that situation would I think I got duped out of a raise too??? I don’t see how I’m missing the point. Sure, I want a raise and JetBlue got a raise but, I can see how it wouldn’t be beneficial for spirit management to just give us one, they have 0 incentive too.
Who can help me send a note to Robin? I want to send him a “Don’t give up the fight” message!
8JRMfortheyear is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 05:42 PM
  #317  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
Ted and Co don’t have a crystal ball.

What wakes them up in a cold sweat at night is the thought that this merger doesn’t go through and they have to roll up their sleeves and sort this mess out alone instead of running off with millions. Some here would have you think a failed B6 merger would mean we jump right back into an F9 deal, as if the DOJ’s anti-merger crusade will suddenly disappear as long as it’s two ULCCs combining. That’s not going to be a very well capitalized adventure with both companies having the same issues currently.
It's kind of too late for that. They have failed to properly manage the operation since the return from Covid. If the deal doesn't go through, I suspect a lot of management gets pushed out.
JulesWinfield is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 07:33 PM
  #318  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 941
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
VILs make more sense than furloughs. Why would we take less than JBLU….again. Will we get a second bite of the VIL apple if we take 40 hours?

Lets think this out

JBLU offers VILs to provide temporary relief for the NEOs while maintaining your trained workforce in times of desperate need for pilots

JBLU is buying NK, and one reason is pilots. So Robin lets Ted furlough the workforce that he will need to make his new megaLCC toy come to life? No.
Exactly what I was going to say. Robin needs the all of NKs people and infrastructure to make this merger successful. I personally would be shocked if any WARN letter is sent out. It makes as much sense to send out WARN letters as is the DOJ argument against the merger, which is not much.

Look at that dumb statement from the DOJ about the deal with Allegiant and Frontier not being finalized and that should answer the question of if they even have a strong case. If that's part of the issue then how about they approve the merger on the condition that those deals are finalized? They sound like they're trying to see what sticks to the wall.
Bgood is online now  
Old 10-16-2023, 08:35 PM
  #319  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default

The seniority system makes short term furloughing disastrously non cost effective - particularly at a major. That’s why some of the majors incentivized early retirement. How much do you really save with a furlough? You are letting go your cheapest people - junior FOs on reserve that maybe cost you less than $100k a year. Who are you keeping? Senior CAs who are costing you $300k plus a year. By the time you consider the training costs and everything, it’s just cheaper to keep everyone and give the surplus senior guys two-thirds pay to do nothing on any furlough situation shorter than two years. And if Pratt & Whitney are going to have to piney up for reimbursement because of their screwups it just makes better sense to do VILs.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 10-16-2023, 08:45 PM
  #320  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,567
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
The seniority system makes short term furloughing disastrously non cost effective - particularly at a major. That’s why some of the majors incentivized early retirement. How much do you really save with a furlough? You are letting go your cheapest people - junior FOs on reserve that maybe cost you less than $100k a year. Who are you keeping? Senior CAs who are costing you $300k plus a year. By the time you consider the training costs and everything, it’s just cheaper to keep everyone and give the surplus senior guys two-thirds pay to do nothing on any furlough situation shorter than two years. And if Pratt & Whitney are going to have to piney up for reimbursement because of their screwups it just makes better sense to do VILs.
You’re conflating costs. AA was allowed the privilege to retire early thousands of pilots because of government money rolling in. Had that cheddar not been there, don’t think for one second they wouldn’t have furloughed thousands, and their current cost structure (minus lots of senior widebody Captains), would be different…
Tranquility is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 10:14 AM
cactiboss
American
271
06-12-2015 05:04 PM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 07:27 AM
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 11:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices