JetBlue merger
#111
What happened to the bites at the apple approach?
#112
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
It's fine. It's a message board.
#113
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
If Robin immediately gave NK pilots B6 rates, many of you would be the first to say you had the superior CBA going into JCBA and seniority list integration arguments because of your other QOL provisions. How would that be fair to B6 pilots?
Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.
Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.
Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
But I wouldn’t assume for a second Robin cares about what’s “fair” to the JBLU pilots when he is trying to get this merger passed.
But at least you’re honest enough to show your true colors; you want NK pilots to stay at a lower rate to hopefully leverage that in the SLI, even though NK at higher rates would help push the JCBa rates higher.
#114
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Great, which is why we have two separate MECs representing our sides interests; just as we will have two merger committees representing our interests.
But I wouldn’t assume for a second Robin cares about what’s “fair” to the JBLU pilots when he is trying to get this merger passed.
But at least you’re honest enough to show your true colors; you want NK pilots to stay at a lower rate to hopefully leverage that in the SLI, even though NK at higher rates would help push the JCBa rates higher.
But I wouldn’t assume for a second Robin cares about what’s “fair” to the JBLU pilots when he is trying to get this merger passed.
But at least you’re honest enough to show your true colors; you want NK pilots to stay at a lower rate to hopefully leverage that in the SLI, even though NK at higher rates would help push the JCBa rates higher.
And as I said, the moment you guys got B6 pay rates, you'd be arguing about how your overall CBA was better going into SLI for YOUR advantage. And there may even be some truth to that argument, maybe. So how about we agree that IF you get an immediate B6 rate snap-up only if B6 gets an immediate NK work rule snap-up. All or nothing, we all win or no one wins?
To a certain degree, we are all gonna look after our own until we are one. That's called reality. Some take it further than others. You have NK guys here that want full relative, and think that's fair no matter how it may disadvantage most of B6. You didn't tell them to "play fair". Those same guys wouldn't even discuss a blend as being fair. I'd prefer straight DOH, but have said I'm fine with a blend, because generally I don't fight so dirty, and do want something that's more fair to everyone.
Anyway, we're all just chatting, because what will be will be and our opinions won't change it.
#115
If Robin immediately gave NK pilots B6 rates, many of you would be the first to say you had the superior CBA going into JCBA and seniority list integration arguments because of your other QOL provisions. How would that be fair to B6 pilots?
Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.
Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.
Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
(sorry, just could not resist.). I (personally) think our work rules are better, and your rates (definitely) are higher. Hopefully the good things in either CBA will end up in the JCBA.
But even if we get your pay it would be because you bought us, not because everything in our CBA was better going into integration, and it would not be an argument in seniority integration anyway. Just like future fleet plans don't count, it is the CBA we had when we started the merger is what counts for seniority integration. Nobody on our side would be stupid enough to even suggest this as an argument, so I am somewhat disappointed to see that from you.
#116
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
I don't entirely buy the higher rates argument. But you had guys here wanting to classify the E190 as a "super-small-narrowbody" and staple all the E190 JB pilots below all NK narrow body pilots. I didn't see you saying "hey let's play fair" when your own were making that suggestion.
And as I said, the moment you guys got B6 pay rates, you'd be arguing about how your overall CBA was better going into SLI for YOUR advantage. And there may even be some truth to that argument, maybe. So how about we agree that IF you get an immediate B6 rate snap-up only if B6 gets an immediate NK work rule snap-up. All or nothing, we all win or no one wins?
To a certain degree, we are all gonna look after our own until we are one. That's called reality. Some take it further than others. You have NK guys here that want full relative, and think that's fair no matter how it may disadvantage most of B6. You didn't tell them to "play fair". Those same guys wouldn't even discuss a blend as being fair. I'd prefer straight DOH, but have said I'm fine with a blend, because generally I don't fight so dirty, and do want something that's more fair to everyone.
Anyway, we're all just chatting, because what will be will be and our opinions won't change it.
And as I said, the moment you guys got B6 pay rates, you'd be arguing about how your overall CBA was better going into SLI for YOUR advantage. And there may even be some truth to that argument, maybe. So how about we agree that IF you get an immediate B6 rate snap-up only if B6 gets an immediate NK work rule snap-up. All or nothing, we all win or no one wins?
To a certain degree, we are all gonna look after our own until we are one. That's called reality. Some take it further than others. You have NK guys here that want full relative, and think that's fair no matter how it may disadvantage most of B6. You didn't tell them to "play fair". Those same guys wouldn't even discuss a blend as being fair. I'd prefer straight DOH, but have said I'm fine with a blend, because generally I don't fight so dirty, and do want something that's more fair to everyone.
Anyway, we're all just chatting, because what will be will be and our opinions won't change it.
But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
#117
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
So what you are saying is that aside from pay, our CBA is better. Good to see that.
(sorry, just could not resist.). I (personally) think our work rules are better, and your rates (definitely) are higher. Hopefully the good things in either CBA would end up in the JCBA.
But even if we get your pay it would be because you bought us, not because everything in our CBA was better going into integration, and it would not be an argument in seniority integration anyway. Just like future fleet plans don't count, it is the CBA we had when we started the merger is what counts for seniority integration. Nobody on our side would be stupid enough to even suggest that as an argument, so I am somewhat disappointed to see that from you.
(sorry, just could not resist.). I (personally) think our work rules are better, and your rates (definitely) are higher. Hopefully the good things in either CBA would end up in the JCBA.
But even if we get your pay it would be because you bought us, not because everything in our CBA was better going into integration, and it would not be an argument in seniority integration anyway. Just like future fleet plans don't count, it is the CBA we had when we started the merger is what counts for seniority integration. Nobody on our side would be stupid enough to even suggest that as an argument, so I am somewhat disappointed to see that from you.
Ultimately I want THE BEST for all of us in the end. But we all know we have to protect our respective groups interest until we are finally one large group.
There are definitely some things I want to keep from your CBA, maybe a lot of things. I guess I just see that where you lack on pay and want immediate parity, we lack some in work rules and should also get immediate parity. After all, why should you get all the pay and all the work rules, before we do? Not seeing how that's reasonable.
#118
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
And there are guys at JBLU who think it should be DOH, like you, and that ain’t happening. Sorry, but DOH ain’t happening neither is relative and anyone who “suggests”‘either hasn’t read a SLI decision in the last 25 years.
But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
Let me know how that "string" works out for ya.
#119
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
And there are guys at JBLU who think it should be DOH, like you, and that ain’t happening. Sorry, but DOH ain’t happening neither is relative and anyone who “suggests”‘either hasn’t read a SLI decision in the last 25 years.
But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post