Search

Notices

JetBlue merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2023, 04:23 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,333
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
Essentially our contention isn’t with the idea of a merger or with your union, rather how committed B6 management is to see NK pilots as current B6 pilots or will they foment division and unequal treatment as a union busting tactic.
What happened to the bites at the apple approach?
JulesWinfield is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 04:42 PM
  #112  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
”I don’t want other pilots to make more money because I can contrive an unlikely scenario where it might affect me”
You can say that, but like I said once it happened you guys would be the first to say you had the better CBA with green grid, DTZ, 4 days etc, and want to use that to your ultimate advantage. But you'll deny that, now.

It's fine. It's a message board.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:08 PM
  #113  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
If Robin immediately gave NK pilots B6 rates, many of you would be the first to say you had the superior CBA going into JCBA and seniority list integration arguments because of your other QOL provisions. How would that be fair to B6 pilots?

Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.

Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
Great, which is why we have two separate MECs representing our sides interests; just as we will have two merger committees representing our interests.

But I wouldn’t assume for a second Robin cares about what’s “fair” to the JBLU pilots when he is trying to get this merger passed.

But at least you’re honest enough to show your true colors; you want NK pilots to stay at a lower rate to hopefully leverage that in the SLI, even though NK at higher rates would help push the JCBa rates higher.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:30 PM
  #114  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Great, which is why we have two separate MECs representing our sides interests; just as we will have two merger committees representing our interests.

But I wouldn’t assume for a second Robin cares about what’s “fair” to the JBLU pilots when he is trying to get this merger passed.

But at least you’re honest enough to show your true colors; you want NK pilots to stay at a lower rate to hopefully leverage that in the SLI, even though NK at higher rates would help push the JCBa rates higher.
I don't entirely buy the higher rates argument. But you had guys here wanting to classify the E190 as a "super-small-narrowbody" and staple all the E190 JB pilots below all NK narrow body pilots. I didn't see you saying "hey let's play fair" when your own were making that suggestion.

And as I said, the moment you guys got B6 pay rates, you'd be arguing about how your overall CBA was better going into SLI for YOUR advantage. And there may even be some truth to that argument, maybe. So how about we agree that IF you get an immediate B6 rate snap-up only if B6 gets an immediate NK work rule snap-up. All or nothing, we all win or no one wins?

​​​​​​To a certain degree, we are all gonna look after our own until we are one. That's called reality. Some take it further than others. You have NK guys here that want full relative, and think that's fair no matter how it may disadvantage most of B6. You didn't tell them to "play fair". Those same guys wouldn't even discuss a blend as being fair. I'd prefer straight DOH, but have said I'm fine with a blend, because generally I don't fight so dirty, and do want something that's more fair to everyone.

Anyway, we're all just chatting, because what will be will be and our opinions won't change it.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:31 PM
  #115  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,330
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
If Robin immediately gave NK pilots B6 rates, many of you would be the first to say you had the superior CBA going into JCBA and seniority list integration arguments because of your other QOL provisions. How would that be fair to B6 pilots?

Not expecting you guys to care, but at least understand why the other side might not be crazy about this idea.

Seems the energy could be better spent working on an expeditious JCBA for everyone. But we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I'm not looking for a fight, just to say my piece, which I have now done.
So what you are saying is that aside from pay, our CBA is better. Good to see that.

(sorry, just could not resist.). I (personally) think our work rules are better, and your rates (definitely) are higher. Hopefully the good things in either CBA will end up in the JCBA.
But even if we get your pay it would be because you bought us, not because everything in our CBA was better going into integration, and it would not be an argument in seniority integration anyway. Just like future fleet plans don't count, it is the CBA we had when we started the merger is what counts for seniority integration. Nobody on our side would be stupid enough to even suggest this as an argument, so I am somewhat disappointed to see that from you.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:35 PM
  #116  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I don't entirely buy the higher rates argument. But you had guys here wanting to classify the E190 as a "super-small-narrowbody" and staple all the E190 JB pilots below all NK narrow body pilots. I didn't see you saying "hey let's play fair" when your own were making that suggestion.

And as I said, the moment you guys got B6 pay rates, you'd be arguing about how your overall CBA was better going into SLI for YOUR advantage. And there may even be some truth to that argument, maybe. So how about we agree that IF you get an immediate B6 rate snap-up only if B6 gets an immediate NK work rule snap-up. All or nothing, we all win or no one wins?

​​​​​​To a certain degree, we are all gonna look after our own until we are one. That's called reality. Some take it further than others. You have NK guys here that want full relative, and think that's fair no matter how it may disadvantage most of B6. You didn't tell them to "play fair". Those same guys wouldn't even discuss a blend as being fair. I'd prefer straight DOH, but have said I'm fine with a blend, because generally I don't fight so dirty, and do want something that's more fair to everyone.

Anyway, we're all just chatting, because what will be will be and our opinions won't change it.
And there are guys at JBLU who think it should be DOH, like you, and that ain’t happening. Sorry, but DOH ain’t happening neither is relative and anyone who “suggests”‘either hasn’t read a SLI decision in the last 25 years.

But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:37 PM
  #117  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
So what you are saying is that aside from pay, our CBA is better. Good to see that.

(sorry, just could not resist.). I (personally) think our work rules are better, and your rates (definitely) are higher. Hopefully the good things in either CBA would end up in the JCBA.
But even if we get your pay it would be because you bought us, not because everything in our CBA was better going into integration, and it would not be an argument in seniority integration anyway. Just like future fleet plans don't count, it is the CBA we had when we started the merger is what counts for seniority integration. Nobody on our side would be stupid enough to even suggest that as an argument, so I am somewhat disappointed to see that from you.
Maybe, but you never know with pilots. I've hardly ever seen a more selfish group in general.

Ultimately I want THE BEST for all of us in the end. But we all know we have to protect our respective groups interest until we are finally one large group.

​​​​​There are definitely some things I want to keep from your CBA, maybe a lot of things. I guess I just see that where you lack on pay and want immediate parity, we lack some in work rules and should also get immediate parity. After all, why should you get all the pay and all the work rules, before we do? Not seeing how that's reasonable.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:39 PM
  #118  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
And there are guys at JBLU who think it should be DOH, like you, and that ain’t happening. Sorry, but DOH ain’t happening neither is relative and anyone who “suggests”‘either hasn’t read a SLI decision in the last 25 years.

But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
It's almost as if you didn't read the part where I said I was ok with a blend... You seem to read what you want to read and not what's really there.

Let me know how that "string" works out for ya.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:45 PM
  #119  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
And there are guys at JBLU who think it should be DOH, like you, and that ain’t happening. Sorry, but DOH ain’t happening neither is relative and anyone who “suggests”‘either hasn’t read a SLI decision in the last 25 years.

But I agree we are and should be looking after our own at this point which is the exact reason our MEC is using this route. Sorry you don’t have any strings to play on your side.
And that "string" you're trying to pull, could have you ending up under Frankie... Doesn't seem like a great idea.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 09-15-2023, 05:49 PM
  #120  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
And that "string" you're trying to pull, could have you ending up under Frankie... Doesn't seem like a great idea.
Sometimes you push the chips in, not cower in fear.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
cactiboss
American
271
06-12-2015 04:04 PM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices