Biden Administration Moving to Block Merger
02-19-2023, 05:20 PM
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 856
What does that even mean? I’m happy we, and 69% of this group understand a gain and took it. You’re the one crying about being a “joke to the industry” and lose sleep that people are laughing at you. I’m the emotional one?
I’m cashing larger paychecks because of this deal while you cry about fictitious pilots laughing at you.
I’m cashing larger paychecks because of this deal while you cry about fictitious pilots laughing at you.
02-19-2023, 07:03 PM
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 220
Big difference between "then" and "than" here. Assuming you meant the latter. Like saying you'd rather get herpes then gonorrhea.
02-19-2023, 07:18 PM
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 856
Oh yea "than" glad you pointed that out, otherwise no one would understand what I was talking about. Does this mean I get an "A" on my internet forum English paper?
02-19-2023, 07:19 PM
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 856
02-20-2023, 11:02 AM
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
I mean, at least admit that your six figure shortfall would be predicated on that exact scenario happening before you try to convince people we would be on 2018 rates with a No vote.
02-20-2023, 01:20 PM
#79
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
That is only accurate if you believe that had we voted no, the company would have withdrawn the $463 million offer that it was convinced would help recruitment/attrition, and left the table until forced to return for section 6. Because it was worth $463 million to them to get first year relief, but it wouldn’t have been worth oh I don’t know, $500 million or whatever would bridge the gap to current rates…. and they would have just walked away because we hurt their feelings and punished us with 2018 rates while continuing to try to recruit and retain with the lowest first year in the industry. AND that if we had voted no, negotiated for a couple months more up the amendable date (which we still haven’t reached by the way) and came to an absolute stalemate where not one further dollar could be obtained… that the company would NOT agree to the original TA terms backdated to Jan 1.
I mean, at least admit that your six figure shortfall would be predicated on that exact scenario happening before you try to convince people we would be on 2018 rates with a No vote.
I mean, at least admit that your six figure shortfall would be predicated on that exact scenario happening before you try to convince people we would be on 2018 rates with a No vote.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
