Search

Notices

Spirit vs big 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2023, 07:12 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
Thankfully there’s about 4500 JetBlue pilots that will have a say
And folks, that pretty much sums up the industry over the last 20 years.
Avro85 is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
Some of the bigger reasons to leave would be wide body or fleet variability. Some want the chance to maybe fly a different type in their career even if they’re happy on the bus. But saying we offer competitive pay isn’t even close. When you factor in soft pay, overrides, retirement, profit sharing at other places the gap gets quite a bit wider from the hard pay that’s already pretty wide. Bases are probably the biggest one. If you prefer a base another airline has and or you plan on moving to base and another airline has one in a city you want to move to that would be a golden ticket.

From what I can see there 2 types of pilots here. Those who came with the intention of staying and living out their career, because they don’t want to go through another training, maybe they’re older and just plan to ride out as as they can till retirement or spirit offer them the best qol for their family and where they live. Then there people who came here never intending to stay but came for the type and experience but never intended on making this a destination. So those people usually already know they’re leaving for any number of the reasons above.
Looking at the 2022 Salary Survey thread determined that this is a lie. Are we behind on the current CBA? Yes. Are we grossly behind? No. Can it be better with the TA? Absolutely. Could we have gotten more? No one knows. But let’s not be disingenuous.
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 02:13 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Looking at the 2022 Salary Survey thread determined that this is a lie. Are we behind on the current CBA? Yes. Are we grossly behind? No. Can it be better with the TA? Absolutely. Could we have gotten more? No one knows. But let’s not be disingenuous.
I never said the word grossly behind. I said that saying we’re competitive is wrong. They have us beat on nearly every metric on the cba. Being maybe $5/hr behind on a single year of hard pay doesn’t necessarily mean we’re competitive because there so much more you have to look at.
Justabusdriver1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 05:12 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,317
Default

Well getting back on the topic of this thread.

Spirit vs……..

From my perspective, the one thing NK has going for it is QOL. It’s unique to NK. It all depends on your lifestyle and your commitment to your employer. At the moment, under our current work rules and compared to several other better paying airlines, a relatively junior pilot can enjoy the flexibility of how easy it is to modify your schedule to meet your personal life needs.

Long story short, if you’re like me and you don’t like the idea of being owned by your employer NK allows this at a much earlier point in seniority vs the big 3.

Of course the big 3 will compensate you far better for your sacrifice and commitment to the company. But you have less of a choice there. They need you to work and the contract allows them to enforce it more than a place like NK.

As a very junior guy, I barely fly (don’t get paid much either) and enjoy running my Family business with little to no compromise from my flight schedule.

From my understanding of talking to other friends that are at the big 3, it’s not quite as easy to have that lifestyle. It’s all in what you prefer.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 05:17 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 896
Default

Originally Posted by Directautogroup
Spirit MEC negotiating committee operates with a philosophy of preserving our training dept intact with seniority list instructors and no contractors. The instructors can then continue their 140 hour lines with 17 days off. Our training LEC council holds considerable sway in union negotiating.

We pay a considerable price in negotiating capital to preserve this training dept and its benefits.
This gives the pilot group far far more positives than any perceived negative.

We staff more pilots than if we had contracted instructors. What does this do for the group? More insulation in the event of furlough. That could change one’s life. Having been furloughed it is nothing I’d ever want to do again.

It also makes your base and seat relative seniority artificially higher in two ways. 1. Your base is bigger than it otherwise would be. 2. When instructors senior to you bid for training you move up a slot that month for every one of them that does this.

If we contracted instructors all those guys are coming back to the line and many getting lines that people junior to them would have otherwise gotten. They aren’t going to resign their seniority number and become contract instructors.

Seniority is everything and anything that makes my seniority higher is a great thing.
Noisecanceller is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 06:15 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
I never said the word grossly behind. I said that saying we’re competitive is wrong. They have us beat on nearly every metric on the cba. Being maybe $5/hr behind on a single year of hard pay doesn’t necessarily mean we’re competitive because there so much more you have to look at.
You literally said that it’s not even close.. CAs making more than $200k with good QOL isn’t close? FOs making $150k and more with good QOL isn’t close? You’re smoking something good and I need it
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 07:48 AM
  #27  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
You literally said that it’s not even close.. CAs making more than $200k with good QOL isn’t close? FOs making $150k and more with good QOL isn’t close? You’re smoking something good and I need it
Been said over and over but the fixation people have over one section of the contract is amazing.

What is the value of selling red/green drop to 0 to management? This vacuum where guys complain about rates and put no value in other sections, why? It’s like having a house with a nice exterior and no furniture in the house.

If you guys are fixated on an hourly rate, vote Teamsters in and deal with what Allegiant is dealing with and their “money on the table” but no improvements elsewhere.


This TA will be voted in, just under 48 hours, we keep our rules, get raises, and hopefully enter TPA in a few months after JBLU votes theirs in.

Hopefully we can mark this as the last time we have to ever negotiate solely with Spirit management, and get rid of these fools.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 10:06 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
You literally said that it’s not even close.. CAs making more than $200k with good QOL isn’t close? FOs making $150k and more with good QOL isn’t close? You’re smoking something good and I need it
Qol wasn’t up for debate. Pay and numbers were specifically mentioned by the OP that were competitive. We’re not. Our new ta is basically the ta DL has now and what UAL has now. Our rates and other metrics of pay lag behind. If our new TA passes we will be competitive with the big 3 till each pass their own new TA.

If you look at the whole picture that’s a different story. But you have to consider every other aspect of working for spirit and qol as well. Not just the contract.
Justabusdriver1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 12:32 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 896
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
You literally said that it’s not even close.. CAs making more than $200k with good QOL isn’t close? FOs making $150k and more with good QOL isn’t close? You’re smoking something good and I need it
I voted yes but no it’s not competitive. It’s a cycle behind.
Noisecanceller is offline  
Old 01-08-2023, 01:27 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
You literally said that it’s not even close.. CAs making more than $200k with good QOL isn’t close? FOs making $150k and more with good QOL isn’t close? You’re smoking something good and I need it
This brings up an interesting argument. For example, I wonder how little a big 3 CA or FO would have to work to make 200k/150k a year respectively. I’m guessing quite a bit less than the Spirit guy trying to hit those same numbers…
onedolla is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Major
50
05-17-2022 11:48 AM
A320Flyer
Major
21
06-18-2010 11:29 PM
A320Flyer
Major
92
06-12-2010 10:02 AM
bubi352
Major
73
07-06-2008 05:58 PM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices