Place Your Bets!
12-17-2022, 04:18 AM
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,823
The word you’re looking for is “pride”
All great responses from a number of you. The only concern I have is if this gets voted down, the company will drag this out until the amendable date, the economy tanks, and now we’re at the table with a bad economy and no leverage.
Of course, this might not happen, but there is a possibility of it
All great responses from a number of you. The only concern I have is if this gets voted down, the company will drag this out until the amendable date, the economy tanks, and now we’re at the table with a bad economy and no leverage.
Of course, this might not happen, but there is a possibility of it
It doesn’t take much brain power to figure out what’s going on in this situation and what NK’s management’s motivations are. Use some common sense and stop being afraid of your own shadow.
12-17-2022, 05:14 AM
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
I guess you haven’t been around the Part 121 world for that long. Basically no company EVER settles a contract before the amendable date or for that matter anywhere near it. Instead they use the RLA to drag it out for years.
It doesn’t take much brain power to figure out what’s going on in this situation and what NK’s management’s motivations are. Use some common sense and stop being afraid of your own shadow.
It doesn’t take much brain power to figure out what’s going on in this situation and what NK’s management’s motivations are. Use some common sense and stop being afraid of your own shadow.
It also doesn't help when your negotiating committee is pimping it and threatening not to go back to the table, like last time. Hopefully fewer fall for their nonsense this time around. The SS duo needs to go, they are a weak combo.
12-17-2022, 05:43 AM
#74
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
I'm pretty sure they're doing it out of the kindness of their hearts, it is Christmas after all! 🎄🎄🎄
It also doesn't help when your negotiating committee is pimping it and threatening not to go back to the table, like last time. Hopefully fewer fall for their nonsense this time around. The SS duo needs to go, they are a weak combo.
It also doesn't help when your negotiating committee is pimping it and threatening not to go back to the table, like last time. Hopefully fewer fall for their nonsense this time around. The SS duo needs to go, they are a weak combo.
If you don’t like the original movie in 2018, as many have complained about, why would you not do anything and allow them to make the sequel in 2022?
Not directed at you, at all. This is directed at the group that constantly demands change and get doesn’t nothing to organize that change when they can. It’s so laughably easy to get “your guy” elected to an LEC position because nobody cares.
12-17-2022, 05:58 AM
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 465
Maybe we will get more than 1 person running for one of handful positions that actually elect the NC members? I always am amused with the number of “we need this” and “we need to get rid of” that and when LEC council reps come open, we get 1 or 2 people running. What was it down for 109 last time, 2 running for CA rep? 1 for 77 FO rep?
If you don’t like the original movie in 2018, as many have complained about, why would you not do anything and allow them to make the sequel in 2022?
Not directed at you, at all. This is directed at the group that constantly demands change and get doesn’t nothing to organize that change when they can. It’s so laughably easy to get “your guy” elected to an LEC position because nobody cares.
If you don’t like the original movie in 2018, as many have complained about, why would you not do anything and allow them to make the sequel in 2022?
Not directed at you, at all. This is directed at the group that constantly demands change and get doesn’t nothing to organize that change when they can. It’s so laughably easy to get “your guy” elected to an LEC position because nobody cares.
12-17-2022, 08:24 AM
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
Maybe we will get more than 1 person running for one of handful positions that actually elect the NC members? I always am amused with the number of “we need this” and “we need to get rid of” that and when LEC council reps come open, we get 1 or 2 people running. What was it down for 109 last time, 2 running for CA rep? 1 for 77 FO rep?
If you don’t like the original movie in 2018, as many have complained about, why would you not do anything and allow them to make the sequel in 2022?
Not directed at you, at all. This is directed at the group that constantly demands change and get doesn’t nothing to organize that change when they can. It’s so laughably easy to get “your guy” elected to an LEC position because nobody cares.
If you don’t like the original movie in 2018, as many have complained about, why would you not do anything and allow them to make the sequel in 2022?
Not directed at you, at all. This is directed at the group that constantly demands change and get doesn’t nothing to organize that change when they can. It’s so laughably easy to get “your guy” elected to an LEC position because nobody cares.
12-17-2022, 08:39 AM
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 182
I don’t see why it should change anyones vote. Anyone with a brain knew that new B6 deal was coming soon, and that it would be a good bit higher than ours. If people were thinking intelligently, they would’ve baked that into their assumptions before it happened. Then again, not everyone thinks that way
12-17-2022, 09:04 AM
#80
Perennial Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
I don’t see why it should change anyones vote. Anyone with a brain knew that new B6 deal was coming soon, and that it would be a good bit higher than ours. If people were thinking intelligently, they would’ve baked that into their assumptions before it happened. Then again, not everyone thinks that way
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
