TA Reached
12-28-2022, 05:04 PM
#731
CA-ORD
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 175
Dude put the KoolAid down already……we don’t have to accept sh|t. If you want to sell yourself short then go ahead
You sound like that other chest pumping yes voter CB in AIP chat…….
12-28-2022, 05:09 PM
#732
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 447
12-29-2022, 12:07 PM
#734
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 723
Correct. If and when the JB merger falls through, it will be right back into the arms of Frontier, who is waiting ever so patiently for NK management to make this happen. .
12-29-2022, 03:08 PM
#735
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Posts: 896
Zero effing way I’m going to work for frontier so this question is important.
12-29-2022, 04:06 PM
#736
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 551
Yeah it doesn’t really work that way. Once our c-suite secured their golden parachutes with B6, there’s no incentive to torpedo the deal, especially with shareholders having voted.
12-29-2022, 05:49 PM
#737
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
If anything, the TA makes it less appealing for Franke. He loves cheap labor so a TA that adds $140m a year in labor isn’t his preference. That’s also the annual cost year after year while he would try to drag out a JCBA with Frontier.
That’s also the rates we would have over F9 in a JCBA, helping our SLI argument on SLI integration.
That’s also money in our pockets while Franke drags out JCBA
But sure, vote no because it isn’t fair. Or we think of the long game and how this can go south quickly if the merger fails.
That’s also the rates we would have over F9 in a JCBA, helping our SLI argument on SLI integration.
That’s also money in our pockets while Franke drags out JCBA
But sure, vote no because it isn’t fair. Or we think of the long game and how this can go south quickly if the merger fails.
12-29-2022, 07:26 PM
#738
Perennial Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
If anything, the TA makes it less appealing for Franke. He loves cheap labor so a TA that adds $140m a year in labor isn’t his preference. That’s also the annual cost year after year while he would try to drag out a JCBA with Frontier.
That’s also the rates we would have over F9 in a JCBA, helping our SLI argument on SLI integration.
That’s also money in our pockets while Franke drags out JCBA
But sure, vote no because it isn’t fair. Or we think of the long game and how this can go south quickly if the merger fails.
That’s also the rates we would have over F9 in a JCBA, helping our SLI argument on SLI integration.
That’s also money in our pockets while Franke drags out JCBA
But sure, vote no because it isn’t fair. Or we think of the long game and how this can go south quickly if the merger fails.
12-29-2022, 10:58 PM
#739
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
I too have no want to work for F9. That being said I feel that by the time we get to the doj our company is going to have been run so badly and lost so much money and pilots that a case could be made that if JB didn’t buy us we would go under. IMO the weaker nk is when they get to the doj the better chance the merger has of being approved.
12-29-2022, 11:10 PM
#740
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 447
I'm no acumen of business or law, but if memory serves me right, much larger airlines that were much more impactful to the industry and market have merged. Thereby setting a precedent. These deals would not have progressed to their present state had politicians in the pockets of Institutional holders like Goldman Sachs, Vanguard, and BlackRock not greenlighted the deal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
