Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2022, 05:10 PM
  #371  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 76
Default

They wouldn't do that. Just like they wouldn't build a plethora of pairings with 23:48 hour RONs for a 16 hour four day.
Avro85 is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:10 PM
  #372  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by onedolla
Since you talk like the smartest one in the room, would a 100%+ (straight to 137) raise for one group have gone over as well as the 52% they got in this? It seems like that might have been harder to swing which is why it ended up being a 2 step deal to get the pay up.
How does one talk like the “smartest one in the room?” I don’t use big words, and my grammar is atrocious. I do know the difference between Paid and Payed, Labor and Laber, unlike our window seat friend above.

Harder to swing for who? Personally I’m just not making that public enemy #1 for this TA. Yesterday it was “it isn’t Alaska,” and now it’s “they can slide first year”.

Contrary to the opinion of some on here, maybe raising first year pay either at DOS or sliding it another time, with our deal secured, will help raise the new hire quality we are seeing. Another full flight sim is being added as we speak.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:14 PM
  #373  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by Tx Paratroopr
What part of once we give them the ability to freely raise first year rates if this ta goes through aren't you getting? Maybe several of us are interpreting the TA wrong but the way it reads is If the TA passes they can just raise first year pay as needed without giving anyone else a pay raise. They could turn around in two months and the company could raise only first year to $110 and everyone else gets nothing.
Which is why I asked would you feel different about the TA if it was published 2 days ago and first year pay was already at the number, without any provision for the slide?

Vote this down because of the “slide that prevents us getting more money because of the slide next year”. Ok, so vote it down and management says “ok, move first year to $137 on TA2, done. So the NC is supposed to vote that deal down? It’s better than the TA1 they voted in? Right?

In the end, we can vote how we want, and see how the cards play out. I’m tired of going back and forth with coworkers, rather be friends than enemies. Some Legacy guys are still ****ed about past mergers/contracts; don’t want to live like that.

Have a good night guys. Catch you once this dust settles
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:17 PM
  #374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
How does one talk like the “smartest one in the room?” I don’t use big words, and my grammar is atrocious. I do know the difference between Paid and Payed, Labor and Laber, unlike our window seat friend above.

Harder to swing for who? Personally I’m just not making that public enemy #1 for this TA. Yesterday it was “it isn’t Alaska,” and now it’s “they can slide first year”.

Contrary to the opinion of some on here, maybe raising first year pay either at DOS or sliding it another time, with our deal secured, will help raise the new hire quality we are seeing. Another full flight sim is being added as we speak.
My mistake. Maybe the way your words come across as slightly condescending, but a lot is lost in translation over the internet. Apologies. I hope you’re right with the new hires, I’ve certainly noticed a trend in the quality of the FOs.
onedolla is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:19 PM
  #375  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by onedolla
My mistake. Maybe the way your words come across as slightly condescending, but a lot is lost in translation over the internet. Apologies. I hope you’re right with the new hires, I’ve certainly noticed a trend in the quality of the FOs.
Not trying to come off that way. In the end man, we are all going to get through this and still remain a pilot group. I hate contract negotiations because it ends up being like politics in the cockpit, just brings out the worst.

As far as new hire FOs…let’s hope!
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:19 PM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,565
Default

If this is voted down, consider it an insurance premium on the merger not going through…. If staffing is solved with the first year slide, what leverage do we have going into a non-jcba negotiation? There are MANY things that need to be fixed in our CBA, and I don’t want to bet the farm that the merger will happen. (Full disclosure, I hope it does happen.)
Tranquility is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:21 PM
  #377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput
I say we send it back and have them come back with something better which I suspect would be within a month of the no vote.

The entire industry changed while this was being negotiated. United had a mutiny, AA sent back an AIP that never even went to a vote and was higher than this, Alaska signed a deal with legacy parity snap up. Delta has an AIP that blows everyone away. JetBlue on the cusp of a deal that will blow us away I suspect. Southwest is a wild card. Frontier won’t have a contract for years bc the company raised first year on its own, added bonuses and is implementing cadet programs modeled after their other portfolio airlines.

Things change and so should our expectations. This isn’t going to be some long drawn out process like usual. Spirit needs this so much more than we do or they wouldn’t offer anything. They are just trying to see what they can get away with.
Yes exactly. I don’t think it would take more than a month or two for a new better offer. To me it’s like insurance, incase the B6 deal falls through. If I lose out on money because it takes too long, it’s worth it for a snap up clause.
Lakeaffect is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:22 PM
  #378  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Which is why I asked would you feel different about the TA if it was published 2 days ago and first year pay was already at the number, without any provision for the slide?

Vote this down because of the “slide that prevents us getting more money because of the slide next year”. Ok, so vote it down and management says “ok, move first year to $137 on TA2, done. So the NC is supposed to vote that deal down? It’s better than the TA1 they voted in? Right?
They can move year one however they like as long as every pay scale after follows. The issue is giving them the ability outside of increasing everyone else's pay. Which is why if the group is going to give it up they get the biggest payout possible. Just ask yourself that one question. Is this the biggest pay out we can get. No? Then why give up the best leverage we have as a group.
Tx Paratroopr is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:23 PM
  #379  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,565
Default

Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
Yes exactly. I don’t think it would take more than a month or two for a new better offer. To me it’s like insurance, incase the B6 deal falls through. If I lose out on money because it takes too long, it’s worth it for a snap up clause.
Beat you….
We’re in the same spot…
Tranquility is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:27 PM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Which is why I asked would you feel different about the TA if it was published 2 days ago and first year pay was already at the number, without any provision for the slide?

Vote this down because of the “slide that prevents us getting more money because of the slide next year”. Ok, so vote it down and management says “ok, move first year to $137 on TA2, done. So the NC is supposed to vote that deal down? It’s better than the TA1 they voted in? Right?

In the end, we can vote how we want, and see how the cards play out. I’m tired of going back and forth with coworkers, rather be friends than enemies. Some Legacy guys are still ****ed about past mergers/contracts; don’t want to live like that.

Have a good night guys. Catch you once this dust settles

It’s not the number. It’s the ability to slide it. Look at frontier. Contract NEVER!
dualinput is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cadetdrivr
United
49
07-14-2020 02:29 PM
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
NoKoolAid
Cargo
36
11-03-2014 12:54 PM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices