Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2022, 05:00 AM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,034
Default

Is this really going to stem attrition? I would still leave. Once you make captain, would be a little harder, but aa year 1 or 2 FO, walking away would be easy even with these new rates.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:07 AM
  #272  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by FlippingCups
I believe quite a few did, myself included. But, yes that was the goal at the beginning, then Alaska came through with theirs and changed things. I and most people I know contacted our reps and wanted to make it known that the Alaska TA changes things and we expected to be at or near Alaska (at the very worst inside $10hr, both seats years 1-12). in some areas we are $25-$30hr behind Alaska. In reality we should be comparing ourselves to Alaska just like UAL compares themselves to DAL. Even the lousy UAL MEC sent out a message to their pilots on 12/5 saying they are directing their NC to withdraw their proposal due to DAL AIP. But we kept plowing forward with the original JB + a few bucks when Alaska got theirs. Hopefully that filled in the blanks for you. Just because you didn't speak up doesn't mean many of us didn't.

Pilot contracts are alot like single family homes... If your neighbor down the street with similar sq ft, floor plan sells his home for $200k 2 weeks ago that now becomes a "sales comp" but the sales comp before that was 2 months ago that sold at $180k, you are wanting to use the $200k comp to put your house on the market, not the $180k it really is the same. The market changes quickly once a new sales comp comes in or in our case a TA gets ratified.
This exactly. Anyone who doesn’t see this doesn’t understand collective bargaining.

on another note… why are most of the gains not realized until 2024?

To me that makes this thing a joke. Unless you are on year one pay or year 12 pay you’ll be waiting until 2024 to see any benefit.
Steve3112 is online now  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:14 AM
  #273  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2022
Posts: 4
Default

[QUOTE=Lincoln Osiris;3548204]Better to do that then to make ourselves look like fools and sell out the rest of our peers. There is more on than the line than just us. Something you have yet to learn but you will. Didn't I tell you to go study for your OE?[/QUOTE

I look like more of a fool when I can’t afford to send the kids to camp, buy clothes or shopping etc because you think that other people care about our pay rate.
rogerwood9462 is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:17 AM
  #274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,542
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Is this really going to stem attrition? I would still leave. Once you make captain, would be a little harder, but aa year 1 or 2 FO, walking away would be easy even with these new rates.
Yeah, I think Mesa still pays more 1st year. This TA doesn’t seem like it will help
Chimpy is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:30 AM
  #275  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Pilot attrition/hiring is still not a pilot problem. If management feels this was the numbers they wanted to attract pilots, this is what they got. You can’t save stupidity, so let them learn the hard way.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:34 AM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 549
Default

Originally Posted by NKSpilot
Solid TA when you take everything into consideration and the scenario that faces us.

The company will not come back to the table as fast as some think, just realistically. Especially the blowhards talking about "cleaning house". How long do you think it takes to go through all that, then do more surveys (so the new negotiating committee isn't flying blind) and then schedule sessions, back and forth, more road shows, voting, etc.

Meanwhile you are losing out on thousands per month. Opportunity cost. Yea, you could probably squeeze out a few dollars more. Is it worth the time and the lost money?

Don't forget, the government takes half of any extra money you get by turning this down (income tax). An extra $10 per hour is more like an extra $5 per hour.

I thank the negotiating committee for their work and I trust them a hell of a lot more than the clowns on this message board beating their chests to make up for some very fragile egos.
Post of the weekend.
gatorbird is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:49 AM
  #277  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Is this really going to stem attrition? I would still leave. Once you make captain, would be a little harder, but aa year 1 or 2 FO, walking away would be easy even with these new rates.
I think management is anticipating a world where all they are going to get is 1500 hour wet ATPs. NK will be a stepping stone to build a resume that will get many if not most of their FOs to the legacies. If they can’t keep enough senior FOs long enough to meet their needs for CAs they will - like many regionals are doing now - put some real money into raising CA pay but until then they are tossing the most money at the year groups they are most having problems with. They are patching leaks now rather than attempting anything comprehensive. Indeed, until they sort out how DOJ is going to handle the JetBlue acquisition, they probably can’t even plan for their own careers far less long term planning for an airline that may or may not be being managed by JetBlue management in 24 months.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:49 AM
  #278  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Douglas9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Pilot attrition/hiring is still not a pilot problem. If management feels this was the numbers they wanted to attract pilots, this is what they got. You can’t save stupidity, so let them learn the hard way.
Yes. Might as well make more money without giving anything up while they figure out this won’t work. They’ll be back.
Douglas9 is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:52 AM
  #279  
CA-ORD
 
SpeedBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by NKSpilot
Solid TA when you take everything into consideration and the scenario that faces us.

The company will not come back to the table as fast as some think, just realistically. Especially the blowhards talking about "cleaning house". How long do you think it takes to go through all that, then do more surveys (so the new negotiating committee isn't flying blind) and then schedule sessions, back and forth, more road shows, voting, etc.

Meanwhile you are losing out on thousands per month. Opportunity cost. Yea, you could probably squeeze out a few dollars more. Is it worth the time and the lost money?

Don't forget, the government takes half of any extra money you get by turning this down (income tax). An extra $10 per hour is more like an extra $5 per hour.

I thank the negotiating committee for their work and I trust them a hell of a lot more than the clowns on this message board beating their chests to make up for some very fragile egos.
Spoken like a True KoolAid drinker.
SpeedBrakes is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 05:52 AM
  #280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,361
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
Pilot attrition/hiring is still not a pilot problem. If management feels this was the numbers they wanted to attract pilots, this is what they got. You can’t save stupidity, so let them learn the hard way.
There were only 73 new hires in November. They were getting 90+ before.
JulesWinfield is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cadetdrivr
United
49
07-14-2020 02:29 PM
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
NoKoolAid
Cargo
36
11-03-2014 12:54 PM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices