Search

Notices

AIP reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2022, 10:37 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
How do you know?
our NC has stated that they were asking above jetBlue rates but also cautioned that Alaska wasn’t going to happen.
MCDUmanipulator is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 11:08 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
our NC has stated that they were asking above jetBlue rates but also cautioned that Alaska wasn’t going to happen.
Yup - I’m hoping once they took tally of the pay rate survey that was sent out in October they adjusted their ask accordingly.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 11:21 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
How do you know?

My magic 8 ball told me.
69fastback is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 12:03 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,283
Default

To help this pass the company is throwing in “Signing bonus”.

$11,000 per year of service.
Halon1211 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 12:14 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Inflation since the last CBA was signed has been 21% so 15% would essential be an agreed to pay cut. Hell no.
Agreed! Due to inflation we need at least 25% increase in the first year for a an actual raise. Yearly Increases after that and Retro pay to reflect the ridiculous inflation since 2020.

Someone mentioned we should compare our gains to Alaska? Alaska rates are old news and would not stop attrition to Delta, United, AA, etc. and other airlines.

Anything less than the legacies rates will not stop attrition and are an insult to the Spirit pilot group
thor55 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 12:44 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 551
Default

Originally Posted by thor55
Agreed! Due to inflation we need at least 25% increase in the first year for a an actual raise. Yearly Increases after that and Retro pay to reflect the ridiculous inflation since 2020.

Someone mentioned we should compare our gains to Alaska? Alaska rates are old news and would not stop attrition to Delta, United, AA, etc. and other airlines.

Anything less than the legacies rates will not stop attrition and are an insult to the Spirit pilot group
Retro pay before the amenable date of the current contract has even passed…huh... I mean why stop at 2020, why not pretend like the current contract never happened and get retro back to 2018
Fah2 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 01:00 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 465
Default

TA-TPA-JCBA. Not sure why this is so hard to understand?
sioux8ships is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 02:14 PM
  #88  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,285
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
Is this DOS Or DOS+4?
DOS+2 for AS
....................
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 02:24 PM
  #89  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,285
Default

Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
which is what that proposal will be a fast no.

I realize that Xcargo wants to give the company relief, but if you give them first year pay, and nothing much for everyone else, you are helping the company and screwing the rest of the Pilot group

yeah I said it. Excargo wants to screw the rest of the pilot group.
Get industry standard slope and FO/CA ratio. Stick with that. Negotiate CA TOS and the rest follows along. If the company wants to pay new-hires more, then raise the whole package. Or make a deal involving bonuses for all.

Recruiting/retention = not pilot problem.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 02:33 PM
  #90  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by sioux8ships
TA-TPA-JCBA. Not sure why this is so hard to understand?
Because we have people on here demanding retro for a contract that isnt amendable yet, but want retro for inflation? Haha. The best is ol ExCargo who wants profit sharing, but because we aren't making money, he wants it off the top revenue line.

So to answer your question on why is it so hard for people to understand, its because we have people who are advocating for the above.

The TA will come out tomorrow and the same 4-5 guys will scream at the moon and declare it "dead on arrival." Most will look at it, judge it on its merits as not being a full contract, decide if this is worth taking to the TPA and then the JCBA, and vote accordingly, while avoiding the back and forth with said 4-5 guys who like to call people's opinions "cancer" and "dangerous" if it doesn't line up with theirs.

Hate to break it to those 4-5 guys but the majority of pilots here dont view themselves as the torch bearers of the industry and that Spirit pilots have some responsibility to vote something down because it isnt Delta, with retro, with profit sharing from top line, and handies from hot FAs.

To the 4-5 guys who will be blowing gaskets on this forum starting around late afternoon tomorrow and until the vote is done, have a Happy Festivus for the rest of us.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avi8tor220
Delta
1746
01-22-2023 08:06 PM
tennisguru
Delta
432
12-08-2022 05:42 PM
Kingairguy200
Endeavor Air
20
11-29-2022 09:52 PM
Mugatu
Frontier
0
11-09-2018 05:29 PM
Thunder1
Southwest
176
09-24-2015 05:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices