Search

Notices

AIP reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2022, 07:57 AM
  #351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,168
Default

That Alaska bidding language more than likely goes away (or is modified by a pbs loa) when pbs is turned on. It shouldn’t be a multi step bidding process anymore. I’ll guess that’s transition language.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 12-11-2022, 08:00 AM
  #352  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by Tx Paratroopr
The only people losing out on 25k in 6 months are first year fo's that would be moving to the new 2nd year pay scale and even that's a stretch. I don't think any other scale Is taking that big of an increase. I also don't see this dragging out as the company needs this deal more than we do. They said In the beginning they want a deal by March. For most captains to make up the difference in pay it's equal to picking up a two day or a few turns and for fo's it's even easier with 200% being handed out like candy.
One way or another, the NK pilot group will be back at the negotiating table in 18-24 months. A 3 month delay would make sense if there were a realistic prospect of recouping in the remaining 15-21 months what was lost by not accepting the first deal, but the longer this drags out the bigger the eventual gain must be in the remaining time to justify it. And the fact that it is only a two year deal means you have to look at it differently as well.

The company recently took out a $600 million loan,

https://industry-update.com/spirit-a...w-debt/186114/

and this deal will absorb about 80% (considering finance charges) of that. MIGHT we get more of that $600 million if we turn this down? Maybe, but who knows? More than that? Not without a delay for management to come up with a new loan, because the money ain’t there until we start making a profit. And how long might that take? The only SURE things are this deal and a replay in 2 years or less in whatever the economic and pilot shortage situation exists at the time.

Last edited by Excargodog; 12-11-2022 at 08:13 AM.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 08:09 AM
  #353  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Hope we can kill the “we don’t deserve it” attitude before JCBA.

JB has been successful in moving into the pay scales(including slope) and retirement of United, Delta, AA over the last two cycles. I expect nothing less in the next two weeks when we agree on our own extension.

Good luck with your vote.
The only reason JB has come up to legacy is because none of them have had a pay raise in 4 years. Wake up.
GPullR is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 09:08 AM
  #354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 718
Default

Would Alaska have taken our rates with our QOL flexibility? Honest question because I have no clue. But the comparable peer floor might be slightly different if you compare apples to apples.
B200 Hawk is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 09:27 AM
  #355  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,283
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
What you seem to be forgetting is that the ULCC model is the most resilient and best positioned to withstand an economic downturn…
tell that to the Spirit pilots that were furloughed in ‘08…
Halon1211 is online now  
Old 12-11-2022, 09:31 AM
  #356  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
Would Alaska have taken our rates with our QOL flexibility? Honest question because I have no clue. But the comparable peer floor might be slightly different if you compare apples to apples.
I often jumpseat on Alaska. Most of the guys/gals I talk to think that the money will help their attrition only somewhat because their QOL has so little flexibility. Like at NK, the senior people will stick around because it’s too painful to start over, but they expect to continue to bleed FOs because of their work rules. Well, that and a semi-toxic relationship with management.

Here’s a short video of the Alaska COO giving the pilot picket line the hairy eyeball:

https://youtu.be/irXxA9RQyCo
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 09:37 AM
  #357  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 551
Default

Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
Would Alaska have taken our rates with our QOL flexibility? Honest question because I have no clue. But the comparable peer floor might be slightly different if you compare apples to apples.
Here’s my answer when people talk about if it’s worth giving up some pay for the infamous NK QOL.

Go look at Delta rates, check out their 330/777/350 widebody rates. Then subtract their narrow body rates, and multiply that difference by yearly credit rates.

See we will never get widebodies at Spirit (despite well over a decade of rumors). We probably won’t at JetBlue, and even those B6 pilots who firmly believe they will have to admit it wouldn’t happen until post merger and extremely capital intensive to get any fleet to an appreciable scale…. Ten years from now at best.

So that’s the price we pay here at Spirit for our infamous QOL, the opportunity cost of the widebody pay we will never see.

I’m fine with not making what a 350 captain makes. I’m fine with not having the sophisticated product other carriers tout. I’m fine with the comments people make when they learn what company I fly for. I’m fine with always being on ghetto end of every terminal. With all that in mind, there is an updated market cost for what it costs to crew a narrowbody N-registered jet, and no one here can sell me on the idea that any QOL should make me feel comfortable accepting less than that market rate.
Fah2 is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 09:39 AM
  #358  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
tell that to the Spirit pilots that were furloughed in ‘08…


Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 10:30 AM
  #359  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 3
Default Another consideration

Should be a "no" vote unless snap up provision to JBLU rates is included should they get new/higher rates before the acquisition. The pilot group with the higher rates will have more leverage for the seniority integration method used when the arbitrators collaborate to come up with a fair and equitable merged seniority list.
sugarcookie is offline  
Old 12-11-2022, 10:43 AM
  #360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 933
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
The only reason JB has come up to legacy is because none of them have had a pay raise in 4 years. Wake up.
Then let Spirit come up to legacy rates too. After all, the legacies haven't had a pay raise in 4 years.

And you can damn well bet B6 stood up in cold ass NY on the streets and demanded it for most of that journey to legacy rates. You get what you want when you demand it, not settle for what the company is willing to offer. Go to sleep.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Last edited by Bgood; 12-11-2022 at 10:57 AM.
Bgood is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avi8tor220
Delta
1746
01-22-2023 08:06 PM
tennisguru
Delta
432
12-08-2022 05:42 PM
Kingairguy200
Endeavor Air
20
11-29-2022 09:52 PM
Mugatu
Frontier
0
11-09-2018 05:29 PM
Thunder1
Southwest
176
09-24-2015 05:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices