Search

Notices

First Week Openers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2022, 05:13 PM
  #181  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I don't think he's saying to fix everyone's pay and leave 1st year crap...

But maybe you're saying fix 1st year and not give everyone else a raise? Otherwise I don't understand the argument.

Management needs to fix 1st year pay, the union says "yes, and also bring everyone else up to current market".

Not hard.

​​​​
And I’m saying, sure - bring first year pay up ti $150 an hour with a 75 MMG and full insurance from day one of intro if they want to raise first year pay. It’ll make backfilling attrition four times as expensive as it is for management now. Make current levels of attrition unaffordable for management. Then they’ll HAVE TO negotiate higher pay. As it is right now, the very cheapness of backfilling with newbies is keeping the company from having to address attrition.

Not hard.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 05:19 PM
  #182  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,954
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
And I’m saying, sure - bring first year pay up ti $150 an hour with a 75 MMG and full insurance from day one of intro if they want to raise first year pay. It’ll make backfilling attrition four times as expensive as it is for management now. Make current levels of attrition unaffordable for management. Then they’ll HAVE TO negotiate higher pay. As it is right now, the very cheapness of backfilling with newbies is keeping the company from having to address attrition.

Not hard.
^^^^And this right here is why we should all pray to our God tonight, thankful Cargo isn’t let anywhere close to the decision desk for any of the negotiations.

Imagine if our NC came on yesterday and said “we have entered into an agreement with management to give first year only, raises to $150 an hour for first year. You will take a pay cut for second year, so yeah, but hey, we made first year so expensive, they will now have to pay everyone more money”

Of course, because it’s clearly cheaper to pay everyone more money than first year $150/hr.

Thank you Jesus, thanks for keeping Cargo away from the grown up table.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 06:54 PM
  #183  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
^^^^And this right here is why we should all pray to our God tonight, thankful Cargo isn’t let anywhere close to the decision desk for any of the negotiations.

Imagine if our NC came on yesterday and said “we have entered into an agreement with management to give first year only, raises to $150 an hour for first year. You will take a pay cut for second year, so yeah, but hey, we made first year so expensive, they will now have to pay everyone more money”

Of course, because it’s clearly cheaper to pay everyone more money than first year $150/hr.

Thank you Jesus, thanks for keeping Cargo away from the grown up table.
Answer the question. How long does your tactic have to not work before you become convinced it won’t work?

Because you’ve been singing that same song for over four years and it ain’t worked yet.

But I do appreciate your piety. 😉

Last edited by Excargodog; 09-30-2022 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Religious recognition.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 06:56 PM
  #184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,283
Default

Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
I’m picturing excargo like this

THIS PHOTO NEEDS TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!!!!

it’s one thing to use a funny photo but since this is the ACTUAL photo of Excargodog this needs to be removed.

Mods,

please remove this photo since this is the actual photo of him!!!!
Halon1211 is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 10:13 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
THIS PHOTO NEEDS TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!!!!

it’s one thing to use a funny photo but since this is the ACTUAL photo of Excargodog this needs to be removed.

Mods,

please remove this photo since this is the actual photo of him!!!!
Looks a little skinny for a true airline pilot. Body by Sbarro.
onedolla is offline  
Old 10-01-2022, 02:21 AM
  #186  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Position: A320 captain
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
wish I was joking. They pretty clearly stated the company’s economic proposal dealt with first year and training pay to attract new pilots.
Yeah thanks, that was already pointed out to me.
But the take away from the zoom call really should not be that the company only wants to increase first year and training pay. Even management knows that would not fly. It was the first week guys. Our NC is negotiating from strength.
DEM1933 is offline  
Old 10-01-2022, 05:40 AM
  #187  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
And I’m saying, sure - bring first year pay up ti $150 an hour with a 75 MMG and full insurance from day one of intro if they want to raise first year pay. It’ll make backfilling attrition four times as expensive as it is for management now. Make current levels of attrition unaffordable for management. Then they’ll HAVE TO negotiate higher pay. As it is right now, the very cheapness of backfilling with newbies is keeping the company from having to address attrition.

Not hard.
Probably not the best strategy considering this is the point in which NK pilots have the most leverage.
Alpiner is offline  
Old 10-01-2022, 06:10 AM
  #188  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
And I’m saying, sure - bring first year pay up ti $150 an hour with a 75 MMG and full insurance from day one of intro if they want to raise first year pay. It’ll make backfilling attrition four times as expensive as it is for management now. Make current levels of attrition unaffordable for management. Then they’ll HAVE TO negotiate higher pay. As it is right now, the very cheapness of backfilling with newbies is keeping the company from having to address attrition.

Not hard.
Management is coming to the table, which is an acknowledgement that they don't desire the current attrition level.

So would you agree to fix only 1st year pay and training pay and leave the rest of the rates alone?

Last edited by Bluedriver; 10-01-2022 at 06:47 AM.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-01-2022, 06:15 AM
  #189  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Answer the question. How long does your tactic have to not work before you become convinced it won’t work?

Because you’ve been singing that same song for over four years and it ain’t worked yet.

But I do appreciate your piety. 😉
And... Answer THIS question:

Management wants to only fix 1st year pay. Which is what you say will fix the pilots problems. So you think management is setting their own trap and just don't know it?
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 10-01-2022, 06:27 AM
  #190  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,203
Default

Originally Posted by Alpiner
Probably not the best strategy considering this is the point in which NK pilots have the most leverage.
People at NK have been saying that for over four years. It hasn’t budged management an inch. And why should it? NK isn’t losing many senior CAs - except to retirement.

The people they are losing - junior CAs who will spend a long time on reserve and FOs are easily replaced as long as new hire classes remain full, replaced by FOs costing them about $50 K that first year and by upgrading FOs with less longevity than those CAs departing. It’s a net decrease in payroll for management.

And management gets to keep the unvested parts of the 401k of those departing. Management is coming out ahead on the deal.

Where is the ‘leverage’ in that?


Cinquo and a few others have been advocating this “strategy” for four plus years, and it hasn’t worked yet. It is the equivalent of bringing in cheap labor to replace the people quitting, negating the leverage of attrition. Why would management raise everyone’s wages to avoid doing that? What other airlines are successfully implementing this policy? Or have implemented this policy? Where has it ever worked?


How long will it have to not work before you’ll be convinced it isn’t going to work?
Excargodog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlettaOcean
United
204
07-22-2022 09:02 AM
Pro2nd
=> United Contract 2022
549
07-15-2022 10:34 AM
OrthoPilot189
Republic Airways
329
11-19-2021 05:27 AM
2GoodEngines
ExpressJet
27
01-21-2020 06:49 PM
misterwl
American
0
06-28-2012 08:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices