Attrition
#971
That/It/Thang
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,967
Because come on, if he trusts management at what they say, he is a moron.
#972
what they stated was that there would be huge cost savings in the synergy of the two companies. If they want those synergies, they will need a JCBA. If they want a JCBA IN THIS ENVIRONMENT they are going to have to up the ante in pilot pay. It’s as simple as that.
#973
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 469
Yeah, we’ve got some serious cheerleaders here. Oblivious to the world. Had one on the hotel van in mco yesterday. He’s saying- the company will pay us, they have to! Ugh!! Same guy that tries to buy ice..
#974
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 469
Indeed. We constantly get reminded here to not negotiate online. Do you really think the two CEIs on a public forum are going to preemptively concede anything?
what they stated was that there would be huge cost savings in the synergy of the two companies. If they want those synergies, they will need a JCBA. If they want a JCBA IN THIS ENVIRONMENT they are going to have to up the ante in pilot pay. It’s as simple as that.
what they stated was that there would be huge cost savings in the synergy of the two companies. If they want those synergies, they will need a JCBA. If they want a JCBA IN THIS ENVIRONMENT they are going to have to up the ante in pilot pay. It’s as simple as that.
Last edited by sioux8ships; 02-25-2022 at 08:12 PM.
#977
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 342
Indeed. We constantly get reminded here to not negotiate online. Do you really think the two CEIs on a public forum are going to preemptively concede anything?
what they stated was that there would be huge cost savings in the synergy of the two companies. If they want those synergies, they will need a JCBA. If they want a JCBA IN THIS ENVIRONMENT they are going to have to up the ante in pilot pay. It’s as simple as that.
what they stated was that there would be huge cost savings in the synergy of the two companies. If they want those synergies, they will need a JCBA. If they want a JCBA IN THIS ENVIRONMENT they are going to have to up the ante in pilot pay. It’s as simple as that.
#978
P/T Gear Slinger
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Airbus
Posts: 824
It is NOW, the environment is good NOW. Give it a year and who knows, probably won't be this good. All they need to do is drag their feet and considering it is going to be at least a year before anything significant is going to happen with this merger, including a new JCBA, I wouldn't hold my breath for that big pay raise.
The nice (or not so bad) thing is, we both have tolerable contracts that will allow us to hold out longer than previous. I don't think an evil-genius plan to build a super ULCC is a "long game" concept. The longer the execution takes, the more time the competition has to end run the plan.
#979
We have no idea about a year from now. Could be worse/better/same.
The nice (or not so bad) thing is, we both have tolerable contracts that will allow us to hold out longer than previous. I don't think an evil-genius plan to build a super ULCC is a "long game" concept. The longer the execution takes, the more time the competition has to end run the plan.
The nice (or not so bad) thing is, we both have tolerable contracts that will allow us to hold out longer than previous. I don't think an evil-genius plan to build a super ULCC is a "long game" concept. The longer the execution takes, the more time the competition has to end run the plan.
In this environment, they weren’t stupid enough to think the pilots unions weren’t going to make financial gains with the next CBA anyway, this just puts pressure on them to not use the typical drag-it-out-as-long-as-we-can-at-the-old-rates tactics that they tend to use. Is it necessarily a win for the pilot group(s)? Nope, but like the current pilot shortage, it gives the unions additional leverage for both monetary and QOL improvements.
I simply don’t understand the ‘woe is us” coming from some posters over this and I have to seriously question if a few of them aren’t shills for management intentionally trying to lower expectations. This ought to be about the easiest damn SLI in history. Right now at NK a newbie can get their base of preference pretty much out of training. That pretty much means the bottom half of the seniority list has little if anything to worry about. I suppose at the very top of the list there might be conflict, but I seriously doubt that someone who has been living in ACY for the last quarter century is going to find some urgent need to displace someone who has been living for the last quarter century in Denver.
And right now while Sprontier is quickly expanding a lot of what might have been profits is going to be going into growth, an excellent time to hit the company for profit sharing which - because the company won’t be realizing much profit - won’t cost them all that much but will lock in pilot gains when the expansion is complete. The same thing for wage gains. If they claim the merger is going to be too costly to allow much increase we simply strongly backload gains in pay scales into DOS+1 or 2 where the management is telling shareholders and the SEC alike that those fruits of consolidation are waiting.
No gripes against those that want to go elsewhere (especially if you are senior to me). Good luck and I hope it works out for you. Just don’t badmouth the merger or the chances of obtaining a better contract here as your rationale for doing it, because the opportunities here have frankly never looked better.
This is a time of opportunity for the pilot group. We OUGHT to have high expectations. It’s on us if we settle for less.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post