Search

Notices

Attrition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2022, 08:24 AM
  #2671  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

My opinion is F9 will be fine, and do fine. I don't think it will ultimately be nearly as large as they/you think it will be. Spirit at one point was on a trajectory to be huge and be a nationwide ULCC. The model really didn't scale as planned, and they haven't been able to stay in near as many markets, long term, as they thought, outside of MCO, LAS, FLL and other Florida. And their costs would continue to rise with longevity (relatively) and there is more new ULCC companies starting service all the time. When your one competitive advantage is being cheap, and remaining the cheapest is impossible/unsustainable over time, you aren't likely to continue your success indefinitely.

It got to the point that F9 and NK were cannibalizing each other's demand on those few markets with tremendous ULCC demand, and figured out they needed to merge to consolidate that market, as opposed to continually fighting over MCO/LAS/Florida.

We'll see, but I don't think F9 will take nearly all those deliveries in it's current form, just as NK will never take all of it's previously planned deliveries in it's current form.

Bottom line, go ahead and buy that new car, you'll be fine. Maybe cancel the order for the G650 though.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 08:40 AM
  #2672  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,347
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
My opinion is F9 will be fine, and do fine. I don't think it will ultimately be nearly as large as they/you think it will be. Spirit at one point was on a trajectory to be huge and be a nationwide ULCC. The model really didn't scale as planned, and they haven't been able to stay in near as many markets, long term, as they thought, outside of MCO, LAS, FLL and other Florida. And their costs would continue to rise with longevity (relatively) and there is more new ULCC companies starting service all the time. When your one competitive advantage is being cheap, and remaining the cheapest is impossible/unsustainable over time, you aren't likely to continue your success indefinitely.

It got to the point that F9 and NK were cannibalizing each other's demand on those few markets with tremendous ULCC demand, and figured out they needed to merge to consolidate that market, as opposed to continually fighting over MCO/LAS/Florida.

We'll see, but I don't think F9 will take nearly all those deliveries in it's current form, just as NK will never take all of it's previously planned deliveries in it's current form.

Bottom line, go ahead and buy that new car, you'll be fine. Maybe cancel the order for the G650 though.
Well duh. There’s a GVII now.
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 08:41 AM
  #2673  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by BananaHammock
I'd bet they're going after rescheduling rules. AA has the worst until we broker this deal.
How can they get worse than what we already have? Our rescheduling flow chart is a joke.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 08:46 AM
  #2674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Well, let's see.

Nations largest ULCC last to profitability.

F9, can't afford jetways in it's home town, and was very late to return to profitability, and would it actually have been profitable if hadn't stolen $200+ million from it's customers?

The model in general seems to run out of steam after it saturates Mickey Mouse, Lost Wages and cheap Florida, both large US ULCCs seem to open and close bases as often as normal people change their underwear. The higher service, higher fare airlines returned to profitability much sooner (in general) and have reached higher levels of profitability than the ULCCs, and new ULCC competition is arriving rapidly...

And, the one main advantage a ULCC has is low cost and cheap tickets, but as they get older their workforce matures onto higher pay scales and new ULCC entrants on low longevity pay will take away their one competitive advantage...

There's more, but I've got other stuff to do. Good luck.
Aircraft start to age, maintenance cost goes up, including things like C checks and so on. Growth must outpace cost for a ULCC to maintain a cost advantage. It’s that simple. Although I don’t think I agree with him, Scott Kirby did just recently call the ULCC model a Ponzi scheme.

Another factor is that every legacy has now added something called basic economy to compete with ULCCs. A small portion of the cabin gets sold at an ULCC price but you get a free carry on, snack, drink, and more leg room for free. That’s got to be siphoning some target customers from ULCCs.
El Peso is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 08:49 AM
  #2675  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BananaHammock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
How can they get worse than what we already have? Our rescheduling flow chart is a joke.
???

They pretty much have to exhaust all options before they can reassign someone already on a trip.

AA = reassignment is scheduling's first choice
BananaHammock is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 08:55 AM
  #2676  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by BananaHammock
???

They pretty much have to exhaust all options before they can reassign someone already on a trip.

AA = reassignment is scheduling's first choice
How long have you worked at AA?
El Peso is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 09:01 AM
  #2677  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
Aircraft start to age, maintenance cost goes up, including things like C checks and so on. Growth must outpace cost for a ULCC to maintain a cost advantage. It’s that simple. Although I don’t think I agree with him, Scott Kirby did just recently call the ULCC model a Ponzi scheme.

Another factor is that every legacy has now added something called basic economy to compete with ULCCs. A small portion of the cabin gets sold at an ULCC price but you get a free carry on, snack, drink, and more leg room for free. That’s got to be siphoning some target customers from ULCCs.
All true, and ultimately to continue the Ponzi scheme, to continue to grow faster than costs, you have to continually find new markets that support ULCC service, consistently, or if seasonal, enough seasonal markets to keep the planes busy most of the year.

I do not believe the ULCC model has shown that it can do that, in the US, on any large scale. That's why you see such dramatic changes in schedule, opening and closing of bases, moving resources around etc ... MCO/LAS have shown near year around ULCC demand, and Florida to a large degree, but otherwise the model has not scaled as planned, and with more traditional airlines offering basic economy... it's really hard to scale beyond those markets I mentioned, and no ULCC has yet to get a commanding share, or be on a trajectory to get a commanding share in any large metro areas where most of the money/travelers are.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 09:04 AM
  #2678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Student of the game
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by BananaHammock
???

They pretty much have to exhaust all options before they can reassign someone already on a trip.

AA = reassignment is scheduling's first choice
Well it happens often here. I’ve only been a lineholder for 5 months but have been rescheduled 8 times.

Our rescheduling pay formula and rules are worse than my former regional.
PossibleDeviation is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 09:05 AM
  #2679  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
My opinion is F9 will be fine, and do fine. I don't think it will ultimately be nearly as large as they/you think it will be. Spirit at one point was on a trajectory to be huge and be a nationwide ULCC. The model really didn't scale as planned, and they haven't been able to stay in near as many markets, long term, as they thought, outside of MCO, LAS, FLL and other Florida. And their costs would continue to rise with longevity (relatively) and there is more new ULCC companies starting service all the time. When your one competitive advantage is being cheap, and remaining the cheapest is impossible/unsustainable over time, you aren't likely to continue your success indefinitely.

It got to the point that F9 and NK were cannibalizing each other's demand on those few markets with tremendous ULCC demand, and figured out they needed to merge to consolidate that market, as opposed to continually fighting over MCO/LAS/Florida.

We'll see, but I don't think F9 will take nearly all those deliveries in it's current form, just as NK will never take all of it's previously planned deliveries in it's current form.

Bottom line, go ahead and buy that new car, you'll be fine. Maybe cancel the order for the G650 though.
Oh Bluey.....I guess we should just add a "MINT" section to our planes and call ourselves an LCC.
Popeye0537 is offline  
Old 11-23-2022, 10:45 AM
  #2680  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BananaHammock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
How long have you worked at AA?
too damn long.
BananaHammock is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 12:32 PM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 08:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 02:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 09:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 08:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices