Search

Notices

Attrition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2022, 04:11 PM
  #1691  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,567
Default

So, we’ve hired 550 pilots and lost 302 due to various reasons….. How’s that Spirit growth plan going to happen with numbers like that? We will post a Q2 loss (along with JetBlue) because we didn’t fly enough revenue miles, because management claims; ATC staffing, weather, Covid restrictions, and Man-Bear-Pig….
Our airline will literally lose money because they drew down flights due to aforementioned issues, but don’t want to address the REAL problem?! **** Ted and his Nashville song, we need new management.
Tranquility is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 06:01 PM
  #1692  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
So, we’ve hired 550 pilots and lost 302 due to various reasons….. How’s that Spirit growth plan going to happen with numbers like that? We will post a Q2 loss (along with JetBlue) because we didn’t fly enough revenue miles, because management claims; ATC staffing, weather, Covid restrictions, and Man-Bear-Pig….
Our airline will literally lose money because they drew down flights due to aforementioned issues, but don’t want to address the REAL problem?! **** Ted and his Nashville song, we need new management.
Well, if you really think the merger will go through, we ought to be working on a LOA right now to bring pay and benefits to B6 parity. Otherwise, the pilot group cripples its own potential growth while making it more likely the NK votes will go to a lower JCBA pay scale just because whatever the JCBA pay scale will be, it’ll be a significantly greater improvement for the NK guys than it is for the B6 guys.

If the merger really is a done deal, everything that can be wangled out of NK before then is all to the good, because we’ll get another turn at bat for the JCBA anyway.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 06:52 PM
  #1693  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
So, we’ve hired 550 pilots and lost 302 due to various reasons….. How’s that Spirit growth plan going to happen with numbers like that? We will post a Q2 loss (along with JetBlue) because we didn’t fly enough revenue miles, because management claims; ATC staffing, weather, Covid restrictions, and Man-Bear-Pig….
Our airline will literally lose money because they drew down flights due to aforementioned issues, but don’t want to address the REAL problem?! **** Ted and his Nashville song, we need new management.
Not disagreeing but I’m guessing the growth plan isn’t based on retaining the entire 500. We are hiring with attrition in mind.
dualinput is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 07:26 PM
  #1694  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput
Not disagreeing but I’m guessing the growth plan isn’t based on retaining the entire 500. We are hiring with attrition in mind.
I assume this can’t be good for our “most leverage we’ve ever had for an industry leading contract” argument though.
onedolla is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 07:30 PM
  #1695  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Default

Training a bunch of people they know will leave certainly has a price. The question is where is the company’s threshold on when that becomes unsustainable either due to supply (unlikely bc they will continue to lower standards instead) or because it become more expensive than paying to retain those you’ve already trained.

You can bet they are a part of lobbying hard for a retirement age increase. If that allows the legacies to pause hiring or even furlough then spirit doesn’t lose anyone except for a trickle of retirement and now they don’t have to pay to incentivize people to stay. They get stuck.

Our leverage is in the fact that JetBlues scope requires a JCBA before anything happens. That’s key and we should’ve had something like that but didn’t negotiate for it or didn’t get it in contract ‘18
dualinput is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 07:43 PM
  #1696  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by onedolla
I assume this can’t be good for our “most leverage we’ve ever had for an industry leading contract” argument though.
It isn't sustainable, especially with all of the aircraft coming in the next two years. As the union has said, it doesn't make sense to park airplanes and wind down the operation by cancelling flights. We're supposed to go to 230 airplanes by the end of 2023.
JulesWinfield is offline  
Old 08-03-2022, 08:03 PM
  #1697  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,536
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
we are not talking about small bases here… we are talking about massive hubs…
CVG was a massive hub, Delta’s second largest. Bigger than SLC or JFK. Probably bigger than any hub JetBlue or Spirit has today.

At any given time we had 8 “screens” full of departure information and they didn’t go more than 4 or 5 hours into the future. Daily flights to Narita, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and over a dozen more in Europe and Asia, and 6 flights/day to places such as Toledo, Appleton, Des Moines, and Syracuse. Just too close to both DTW and MSP when the Northwest merger went through.
Boomer is offline  
Old 08-04-2022, 06:00 AM
  #1698  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Well, if you really think the merger will go through, we ought to be working on a LOA right now to bring pay and benefits to B6 parity. Otherwise, the pilot group cripples its own potential growth while making it more likely the NK votes will go to a lower JCBA pay scale just because whatever the JCBA pay scale will be, it’ll be a significantly greater improvement for the NK guys than it is for the B6 guys.

If the merger really is a done deal, everything that can be wangled out of NK before then is all to the good, because we’ll get another turn at bat for the JCBA anyway.

No, we need to be working on a LOA with 40% raises across the board. Not current B6 levels. Remember ALPA and mgmt met in DC weeks ago then Ted walked away from the table at Frankie’s request. Following that LOA we get started on our own improved CBA. We worry about ourselves right not. Not B6. Lots of boxes have to be checked first. A kicka$$ new CBA just helps our possible B6 brothers down the road. That’s where Our focus should be!
IWalkJun12 is offline  
Old 08-04-2022, 05:07 PM
  #1699  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,252
Default

Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
No, we need to be working on a LOA with 40% raises across the board. Not current B6 levels. Remember ALPA and mgmt met in DC weeks ago then Ted walked away from the table at Frankie’s request. Following that LOA we get started on our own improved CBA. We worry about ourselves right not. Not B6. Lots of boxes have to be checked first. A kicka$$ new CBA just helps our possible B6 brothers down the road. That’s where Our focus should be!
Not worried about JB. What I am is worried about getting as much as we can BEFORE the JCBA to raise the baseline FOR the JCBA. We’ll have leverage from the very fact that B6 will HAVE to have a JCBA. Not taking what we can get before the JCBA isn’t going to do us or the JCBA any good.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 08-04-2022, 10:25 PM
  #1700  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by IWalkJun12
No, we need to be working on a LOA with 40% raises across the board. Not current B6 levels. Remember ALPA and mgmt met in DC weeks ago then Ted walked away from the table at Frankie’s request. Following that LOA we get started on our own improved CBA. We worry about ourselves right not. Not B6. Lots of boxes have to be checked first. A kicka$$ new CBA just helps our possible B6 brothers down the road. That’s where Our focus should be!
Getting a 40% raise before B6 JCBA is probably not realistic. If we hold out for that, we’ll just be stuck at our current rates, and then be negotiating a JCBA, bringing less to the table. Normally, I’d be up for holding out, but not in this situation, time is of the essence.
Lakeaffect is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 12:32 PM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 08:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 02:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 09:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 08:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices