Search

Notices

Attrition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2022, 04:28 PM
  #1521  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
But... but... 42%... it's soooooo much and we gotta wait til next time to ask for more.

IDK why anyone voted Yes, but here we are.
I don't actually agree with his premise, but I at least wanted HIS story to have a chance at making sense.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 04:34 PM
  #1522  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,330
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
1. Not accurate.

2. YOU must mean ***Spirit*** pilots agree to have probationary pilots get less.
You know who those first year pilots are? They are our fellow pilots. And you are what I called you because your reasoning is no prospective pilot would be able to look beyond first year pay, but you have all the answers. Not about NK vs JB at all. Just about you being what you are.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 04:46 PM
  #1523  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver

So I'm going to respectfully expect you to stay the H E double-hockey-sticks away from my negotiating committee and executive council strategic planning, as you are all emotion and no situational awareness.
I’ve always thought it amusing that the expression “fat chance” and “slim chance” mean pretty much the same thing. Take your pick.

So I’m going to respectfully expect you to do nothing to interfere with me exercising my rights as a dues paying union member to make my opinion known to OUR negotiating committee and executive council strategic planning, since we all get an opinion, not just those like you with delusions of adequacy trying to work up to delusions of grandeur.

I think the current UA TA fiasco is indicative of what can happen when arrogant self-centered know-it-alls cease listening to their union brothers. Wouldn’t want that to happen with the JCBA.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 05:17 PM
  #1524  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 998
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
I’ve always thought it amusing that the expression “fat chance” and “slim chance” mean pretty much the same thing. Take your pick.

So I’m going to respectfully expect you to do nothing to interfere with me exercising my rights as a dues paying union member to make my opinion known to OUR negotiating committee and executive council strategic planning, since we all get an opinion, not just those like you with delusions of adequacy trying to work up to delusions of grandeur.

I think the current UA TA fiasco is indicative of what can happen when arrogant self-centered know-it-alls cease listening to their union brothers. Wouldn’t want that to happen with the JCBA.
To a certain extent, that’s exactly what has been happening at JetBlue. Why we’re all so desperate for a change in Union leadership.
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 05:18 PM
  #1525  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,330
Default

"You mistake the difference between what I desire as a final outcome, and the strategy I would employ to get there. Ultimately it is the COMPANY'S responsibility to staff the airline. It is the COMPANY'S responsibility to attract and retain pilots. Day 1 of section 6 the company would LOVE for you to fix THEIR attraction and retention problem by offering up a reduction in expectations for the other 50%+ of the pilot group to finance an increase for FO pay.. You would be their wet dream. In this environment where they can't staff the company, which is THEIR responsibility, and their business plans and promises to Wall Street don't work without staffing the company, you make it clear to them that you will give up NOTHING from your expectations for the other 50% of the pilot group. No robbing the captain to pay the FO on this one. And I guarantee you, that last, best final offer will magically have a competitive FO pay. That wasn't the case in the last cycle, predominantly for the ULCCs (which should tell you something about that business model), but it was for most of the rest of us, and WILL be the case this time."

This is you. #slipperyslope, #weareallpilots.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 08:26 PM
  #1526  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Buddy of mine just took the UAL class, while waiting for the DL results. 2013 hire, 20+ years to go

Thanks, I've been here a few years longer than them and I'm a few years older which is what's making it a difficult decision.
BluNK is offline  
Old 07-18-2022, 10:54 PM
  #1527  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,330
Default

Originally Posted by BluNK
Thanks, I've been here a few years longer than them and I'm a few years older which is what's making it a difficult decision.
Yeah, I'm almost 10 years in, and just over 10 left. Commute, so definitely would only would leave to not commute.
Going back to the bottom isn't easy.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 07-19-2022, 04:20 AM
  #1528  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
You know who those first year pilots are? They are our fellow pilots. And you are what I called you because your reasoning is no prospective pilot would be able to look beyond first year pay, but you have all the answers. Not about NK vs JB at all. Just about you being what you are.
I think you guys are all very confused.

1. Where did I ever say I didn't expect the final OUTCOME to be a great 1st year pay rate?

2. Did I not ask you all to reference JB's 1st year pay rate (industry leading) if you want to know how JetBlue management and JetBlue pilots feel about first year pilots?

You guys only hear what you want to hear.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 07-19-2022, 06:27 AM
  #1529  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,112
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
In this environment, MANAGEMENT needs 1st year pay to increase. They may bluff and say you need to negotiate for 1st year pay increases, but in this environment MANAGEMENT needs it. Don't waste negotiating capital on it as they won't have any choice but to ultimately include a competitive 1st year pay in their "last, best offer".
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Here's the things about me, I'm not the guy you can bully into "not bringing something up" for fear of YOUR rebuttal. Your words and analysis of the situation are basic and inaccurate, at best.

Did Frontier raise 1st year pay out of "caring and love"? Yes or no? Was "caring and love" the reason? Yes or no?

And JB 1st year pay isn't standard, it's basically industry leading. Try and be accurate and precise when you speak to me.

You mistake the difference between what I desire as a final outcome, and the strategy I would employ to get there. Ultimately it is the COMPANY'S responsibility to staff the airline. It is the COMPANY'S responsibility to attract and retain new pilots. Day 1 of section 6 the company would LOVE for you to fix THEIR attraction and retention problem by offering up a reduction in expectations for the other 95%+ of the pilot group to finance an increase to year 1 pay. You would be their wet dream. In this environment where they can't staff the company, which is THEIR responsibility, and their business plans and promises to Wall Street don't work without staffing the company, you make it clear to them that you will give up NOTHING from your expectations for the other 95%+ of the pilot group. No robbing Peter to pay Paul on this one. And I guarantee you, that last, best final offer will magically have a competitive 1st year pay. That wasn't the case in the last cycle, predominantly for the ULCCs (which should tell you something about that business model), but it was for most of the rest of us, and WILL be the case this time.

So I'm going to respectfully expect you to stay the H E double-hockey-sticks away from my negotiating committee and executive council strategic planning, as you are all emotion and no situational awareness.
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I think you guys are all very confused.

1. Where did I ever say I didn't expect the final OUTCOME to be a great 1st year pay rate?

2. Did I not ask you all to reference JB's 1st year pay rate (industry leading) if you want to know how JetBlue management and JetBlue pilots feel about first year pilots?

You guys only hear what you want to hear.

To begin with, you wandered blindly into an old argument. No one said that B6s first year pay was not industry standard, but NKs isn’t and never had been. Your first posting was nearly a word for word duplicate of what Mayo and a few others have used for years to justify a pi$$-poor industry low first year pay and an even more pathetic training pay that advocated holding newbies (and recruiting) hostage to extracting more pay for the non-newbies. And if you look at what the OUTCOME of that strategy has been at NK, it sure as H€|| has NOT been anything approaching industry standard. It doesn’t seem to have worked all that well at F9 either, although they at least had the option to raise first year pay and management brought it up to well, still industry lagging, but not industry lagging as much as NK.

In the meantime, in a company where (preCOVID) 15% of the people were newbies every year, they were being started out at a fraction of the pay they had when they left the regionals AND YEAH, WE COULD ALL DO THE MATH AND KNEW IT WOULD BE A BETTER DEAL IN THE LONG RUN, but most thought that wasn’t the way to treat our fellow pilots and that it undermined the unity a union should have.

So before you blunder into a furball on an issue where that has long been discussed, you might want to see the results of that attitude where you are discussing it, on anNK board. THIS is where that philosophy got us here:

Training Pay: $1750 per month
no insurance initially while training
First year pay currently up to $61 a month w 72 hr guarantee on reserve although preCOVID it was still in the $50s

total before taxes about $ 43,500 today.

So don’t blame the junior pilots here for believing that your philosophy of not “wasting” leverage on new pilots is as self evident to them as it seems to be to you, because their experience with the results of that philosophy is very different than yours. If you are too ignorant or arrogant to understand that, that’s on you, not on them.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-19-2022, 08:10 AM
  #1530  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,920
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
To begin with, you wandered blindly into an old argument. No one said that B6s first year pay was not industry standard, but NKs isn’t and never had been. Your first posting was nearly a word for word duplicate of what Mayo and a few others have used for years to justify a pi$$-poor industry low first year pay and an even more pathetic training pay that advocated holding newbies (and recruiting) hostage to extracting more pay for the non-newbies. And if you look at what the OUTCOME of that strategy has been at NK, it sure as H€|| has NOT been anything approaching industry standard. It doesn’t seem to have worked all that well at F9 either, although they at least had the option to raise first year pay and management brought it up to well, still industry lagging, but not industry lagging as much as NK.

In the meantime, in a company where (preCOVID) 15% of the people were newbies every year, they were being started out at a fraction of the pay they had when they left the regionals AND YEAH, WE COULD ALL DO THE MATH AND KNEW IT WOULD BE A BETTER DEAL IN THE LONG RUN, but most thought that wasn’t the way to treat our fellow pilots and that it undermined the unity a union should have.

So before you blunder into a furball on an issue where that has long been discussed, you might want to see the results of that attitude where you are discussing it, on anNK board. THIS is where that philosophy got us here:

Training Pay: $1750 per month
no insurance initially while training
First year pay currently up to $61 a month w 72 hr guarantee on reserve although preCOVID it was still in the $50s

total before taxes about $ 43,500 today.

So don’t blame the junior pilots here for believing that your philosophy of not “wasting” leverage on new pilots is as self evident to them as it seems to be to you, because their experience with the results of that philosophy is very different than yours. If you are too ignorant or arrogant to understand that, that’s on you, not on them.
That's all fascinating.
So, included in your quoted posts of mine, nowhere did I ever say or imply that I didn't expect a great first-year pay. We simply disagree on how to achieve it. I hope you enjoyed your unnecessary tirade.
Bluedriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 11:32 AM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 07:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 08:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 07:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices