Off runway at BWI
12-21-2020, 01:59 PM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Off runway at BWI
They get fired. See Peter Ridd. Plenty of other examples if one searches.
Temperatures cycle in multidecade cycles. Of course the strategy now is to 'smooth' the data to make multiyear temperature dips disappear. There was a pretty significant world temperature decline from ~1946 to the late 1970s. That's pretty much disappeared from the historic data thanks to the magic of data smoothing.
Temperatures cycle in multidecade cycles. Of course the strategy now is to 'smooth' the data to make multiyear temperature dips disappear. There was a pretty significant world temperature decline from ~1946 to the late 1970s. That's pretty much disappeared from the historic data thanks to the magic of data smoothing.
I’m sure the people who study this for a living don’t realize that. And they probably don’t have the data you have access to Andy.
But let’s say you’re right and there’s a big conspiracy amongst scientists... What’s the motive behind this scientific conspiracy theory? What’s the end game they’re trying to achieve? You really think that they’re all just saying this because some global scientist overlord is threatening their jobs if they don’t?
12-21-2020, 02:34 PM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 200
12-21-2020, 04:03 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
I’m sure the people who study this for a living don’t realize that. And they probably don’t have the data you have access to Andy.
But let’s say you’re right and there’s a big conspiracy amongst scientists... What’s the motive behind this scientific conspiracy theory? What’s the end game they’re trying to achieve? You really think that they’re all just saying this because some global scientist overlord is threatening their jobs if they don’t?
But let’s say you’re right and there’s a big conspiracy amongst scientists... What’s the motive behind this scientific conspiracy theory? What’s the end game they’re trying to achieve? You really think that they’re all just saying this because some global scientist overlord is threatening their jobs if they don’t?
f you for one minute think that there's no pressure to conform in that profession, you're dreaming. Access to grants and having a job are a couple of reasons to conform to the 'consensus'. Not to mention getting published.
Of course if anyone does disagree, people like you are going to smear them with the claim that they're getting paid by oil and coal companies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
