Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
700 furloughs have not been announced 7/13/20 >

700 furloughs have not been announced 7/13/20

Search

Notices

700 furloughs have not been announced 7/13/20

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2020, 08:24 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by AllOva736
not sure if I get your math but a CA ( say 4th year ) at 50 hours is about 10,500 per month. That would be about 96 hours on second year pay, not less than guarantee.
He said senior CA, which is where most of the VIL are going to. 12 year CA taking a 22 hrs cut, is a savings of $5K/month. First year FO is around $4,100 on guarantee. I’m pretty sure he’s saying the company save more by having a senior take a VIL, than cutting a first year FO and the savings is almost what a 2nd year FO makes. That’s how I read his post.

Last edited by Silver02ex; 07-16-2020 at 08:35 AM.
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 09:15 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain
seems like "current industry practice" is offer the voluntary leaves first. aka Big-3, SWA, etc.

we have not seen that yet. when we do, then something is brewing

I don’t think we will see long term VIL here, easier and cheaper just to furlough. The reason the big three are offering it is because of multi fleet type and swa is offering it to try and avoid furloughing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
flyingpuma1 is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 09:34 AM
  #63  
Bus Driver ordinarie
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
He said senior CA, which is where most of the VIL are going to. 12 year CA taking a 22 hrs cut, is a savings of $5K/month. First year FO is around $4,100 on guarantee. I’m pretty sure he’s saying the company save more by having a senior take a VIL, than cutting a first year FO and the savings is almost what a 2nd year FO makes. That’s how I read his post.
The ‘cost’ of an employee is substantially more
than just what they’re paid.
taxes; administrative and support overheads; software licensing et al. It’s around
150% of gross pay at least.
Punkah Louvre is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 09:58 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 612
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
He said senior CA, which is where most of the VIL are going to. 12 year CA taking a 22 hrs cut, is a savings of $5K/month. First year FO is around $4,100 on guarantee. I’m pretty sure he’s saying the company save more by having a senior take a VIL, than cutting a first year FO and the savings is almost what a 2nd year FO makes. That’s how I read his post.
yeah I just read it again, you’re right.
AllOva736 is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 11:19 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
My base chat had a rundown of JM talking to a RGS last week. He said the same things you always hear in the Town Halls, but he mentioned SB 2021 numerous times. It certainly sounded like/implied that was going to be a big bench mark, long term, what happens here regarding size.

Someone posted an article above a couple days ago. Granted it was from SeekingAlpha, but none the less:

If they really did secure $730 million in CAREs loans and we now have $1.7B or so liquid and cash burn down to $2 million a day, I just don’t see how furloughing moves the needle any significant amount, if you want these guys for end of Nov, December and SB 21.

Someone did the math on another thread here. Furloughing bottom 500 and downgrading 200 from Oct 1 to Summer 2021 only saved $40 Million. There is also costs and time to bring them back online as well.

Maybe next trip I’ll figure out the cost savings for 1, 2 and 3 month VILs for 250, 500 in each seat.
The union calculated a savings of only $21 million.
putzin is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 01:02 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 988
Default

Good chance there will be a vaccine in circulation by the end of the year. When that happens it should boost the public’s confidence in travel pretty quickly. Like we started to see when the covid numbers were low for a month. I’d imagine the company will want to be in position to capitalize and lead the recovery race when that happens. I’ll admit I’m probably optimistic though since I’m bottom 500 here.
MCDUmanipulator is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 01:29 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Stryker172's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: C-172
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
Good chance there will be a vaccine in circulation by the end of the year. When that happens it should boost the public’s confidence in travel pretty quickly. Like we started to see when the covid numbers were low for a month. I’d imagine the company will want to be in position to capitalize and lead the recovery race when that happens. I’ll admit I’m probably optimistic though since I’m bottom 500 here.
I don't know if its so much a lack of confidence from the public as it is an everything is closed and theres no reason to travel. I dont think people are nearly as scared as the media portrays, theres simply no reason to go anywhere until things open up.
Stryker172 is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 01:36 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 214
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
Good chance there will be a vaccine in circulation by the end of the year. When that happens it should boost the public’s confidence in travel pretty quickly. Like we started to see when the covid numbers were low for a month. I’d imagine the company will want to be in position to capitalize and lead the recovery race when that happens. I’ll admit I’m probably optimistic though since I’m bottom 500 here.
Most science points to there NOT being a vaccine by the end of the year in reality here.
korg128 is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 03:01 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
king10pin02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by korg128
Most science points to there NOT being a vaccine by the end of the year in reality here.
would u take a brand new vaccine with no idea the long term effects?
king10pin02 is offline  
Old 07-16-2020, 03:54 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 214
Default

Originally Posted by king10pin02
would u take a brand new vaccine with no idea the long term effects?
That's quite exactly my point and part of the equation of having a fully ready vaccine. We're literally cramming 5 years of research into as little time as possible. Though I'm not worried about growing another eyeball on my forehead in terms of a "ready" vaccine I'm just saying that there will not be one this year. Great if there was but nobody reputable is saying this. I think the only people who are saying there will be are the anti maskers who want to feel justified in their selfish egos.
korg128 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StallFail
Regional
24
07-13-2009 07:03 AM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
UAL T38 Phlyer
Major
69
05-04-2008 05:30 AM
daytonaflyer
Major
0
04-11-2008 10:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices