Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
Save stock down way more than competitors? >

Save stock down way more than competitors?

Search

Notices

Save stock down way more than competitors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2020, 07:26 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Default

It says they think spirit has a higher chance of BK.
5and20 is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 07:28 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211
Somebody once told me that a lot of people get us mixed up with Spirit Aerospace (the company that makes aircraft parts) so that could have something to do with it.
Dude this is just silly

Last edited by 5and20; 03-16-2020 at 08:05 AM.
5and20 is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 07:51 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,283
Default

Originally Posted by 5and20
Dude thus just silly
i think so too
Halon1211 is online now  
Old 03-16-2020, 07:56 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DrSteveBrule's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Position: A320 For Your Health
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by sobo
I'm not an investing expert by any means, so take this with a grain of salt.


From Spirit's 2019 10-K:

Spirit has $1.55B in contractual obligations due for 2020. This does not include the cost of operations, just debt principal, interest, aircraft leases, and aircraft purchase obligations. So while the ~$1.1B in cash/short term investments on hand looks good, it's not enough to satisfy the debt obligations the company has for an entire year even if the airline did not have to consider things like fuel, labor, landing fees, taxes, etc.


To put that in comparison, from SWA's 2019 10-k.

SWA has $3.6B in contractual obligations. However, over $2b of that is aircraft orders (max) which they may not be obligated to pay for considering the aircraft is un-airworthy. Regardless, even if they did take the entire order they have ~$4.0B in cash/short term investments on hand.


More food for thought is how leveraged the aircraft are at each company. While for example Delta is indeed parking aircraft, it's because they have the luxury of having a paid off fleet and can downsize as necessary. I can't say for certain but I would imagine the most of the newer fleet at Spirit would be leased/mortgaged thus requiring payment whether or not an aircraft is generating revenue. Obviously not something great for business if demand falls to nearly 0.


Lastly, I think there is also an investor perception that the government would be more apt to help SWA or the big 3 versus something like Spirit/Frontier... but that's just a wild guess.


That is my best guess as to what I think Wall Street is seeing. In my personal opinion I think SAVE is tremendously undervalued overall though. I think the business model is robust and I also think the type of passengers will be quicker to bounce back versus the business travelers that the big 3 rely on to generate the most revenue. I also believe that even if we ban domestic travel for 30 days, the spool up will go back to normal a lot quicker than most downturns we've seen in the industry based on the fact that this is just a consumer fear issue that hopefully will be resolved if this gets under control.

This is it. Investors have been sounding the alarms since for quite a while. Stock price hasn't just started tanking now due to COVID, this is an extension of a longer period of declining value and increased risk.
DrSteveBrule is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:07 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Default

Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
This is it. Investors have been sounding the alarms since for quite a while. Stock price hasn't just started tanking now due to COVID, this is an extension of a longer period of declining value and increased risk.
Another thing that is pretty wild to see is Spirit (thus far) is still planing to grow year over year for the months of April and May, when everyone, including their peers at Frontier are reducing capacity. There very well could be something the public doesn't see (bookings/etc). However, it also makes me believe they are either waiting to see how this plays out, doing too little, or the worst case scenario: are forced to press forward.

If you have a lot of leveraged/leased aircraft and you don't have the luxury of downsizing, Spirit may just be pressing forward because they have no other option than to do so. That fleet is going to be burning through cash sitting or flying, so they might as well not give up the market share and are gambling that this will be a short term demand issue.
sobo is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:14 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 26
Default

Pretty solid insight. I've gotta wonder what happens with our huge aircraft order and $250M new HDQ. $250M is now close to 1/3 of our entire market cap.

Originally Posted by sobo
I'm not an investing expert by any means, so take this with a grain of salt.


From Spirit's 2019 10-K:

Spirit has $1.55B in contractual obligations due for 2020. This does not include the cost of operations, just debt principal, interest, aircraft leases, and aircraft purchase obligations. So while the ~$1.1B in cash/short term investments on hand looks good, it's not enough to satisfy the debt obligations the company has for an entire year even if the airline did not have to consider things like fuel, labor, landing fees, taxes, etc.


To put that in comparison, from SWA's 2019 10-k.

SWA has $3.6B in contractual obligations. However, over $2b of that is aircraft orders (max) which they may not be obligated to pay for considering the aircraft is un-airworthy. Regardless, even if they did take the entire order they have ~$4.0B in cash/short term investments on hand.


More food for thought is how leveraged the aircraft are at each company. While for example Delta is indeed parking aircraft, it's because they have the luxury of having a paid off fleet and can downsize as necessary. I can't say for certain but I would imagine the most of the newer fleet at Spirit would be leased/mortgaged thus requiring payment whether or not an aircraft is generating revenue. Obviously not something great for business if demand falls to nearly 0.


Lastly, I think there is also an investor perception that the government would be more apt to help SWA or the big 3 versus something like Spirit/Frontier... but that's just a wild guess.


That is my best guess as to what I think Wall Street is seeing. In my personal opinion I think SAVE is tremendously undervalued overall though. I think the business model is robust and I also think the type of passengers will be quicker to bounce back versus the business travelers that the big 3 rely on to generate the most revenue. I also believe that even if we ban domestic travel for 30 days, the spool up will go back to normal a lot quicker than most downturns we've seen in the industry based on the fact that this is just a consumer fear issue that hopefully will be resolved if this gets under control.
stevo22 is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:15 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 988
Default

Ted said in his first update we have 39 planes we can easily park.

I expect an updated outlook either today or tomorrow with massive cuts like everyone else.
MCDUmanipulator is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:16 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 26
Default

If this blows over quicker than anticipated, it could really work out in Spirit's favor and put us in a comparatively good position. If not, it could end BADLY. I imagine we'll follow suit with capacity reductions in the near future though.


Originally Posted by sobo
Another thing that is pretty wild to see is Spirit (thus far) is still planing to grow year over year for the months of April and May, when everyone, including their peers at Frontier are reducing capacity. There very well could be something the public doesn't see (bookings/etc). However, it also makes me believe they are either waiting to see how this plays out, doing too little, or the worst case scenario: are forced to press forward.

If you have a lot of leveraged/leased aircraft and you don't have the luxury of downsizing, Spirit may just be pressing forward because they have no other option than to do so. That fleet is going to be burning through cash sitting or flying, so they might as well not give up the market share and are gambling that this will be a short term demand issue.
stevo22 is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:50 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 498
Default

Originally Posted by stevo22
If this blows over quicker than anticipated, it could really work out in Spirit's favor and put us in a comparatively good position. If not, it could end BADLY. I imagine we'll follow suit with capacity reductions in the near future though.
Agreed, seems like management is gambling on this being a blip and blowing over. Hoping their gamble pays off, otherwise we all could be in trouble.
Meep is offline  
Old 03-16-2020, 08:52 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 988
Default

Well if it doesn’t blow over quick the whole industry is in trouble regardless of what’s done. So could be a low risk bet.
MCDUmanipulator is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winglet
Mesa Airlines
1487
03-01-2011 07:23 PM
Salerio
Major
19
04-08-2010 09:31 AM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
LAfrequentflyer
Money Talk
0
12-13-2006 01:18 PM
Fly4Beer
Major
2
04-12-2006 05:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices