Search

Notices

This thing is a NO!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2018, 06:44 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,783
Default

Originally Posted by Justmeagain
*not a personal comment*

Grow a backbone! It’s time to walk away for a few months and let the company come back with improvements. We’re giving up too much!
That’s exactly what happened with us at SWA. The first TA got voted down and the second one was much improved. Hang in there Spirit Pilots. You’ve got them by the balls. Don’t blow your leverage. The economy is humming and new airplanes are on order. They’ll come back to the table with something better.

Conceding to PBS and lost of vacation conflict is HUGE. I’m dumbfounded that this is even being considered by you guys considering how much of a concession those are.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 06:52 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Now I’m confused or maybe you are just making up more crap that I have to shut you down on. But where in the hell does it say that if the company buys a regional or another carrier we lose all protections???
1.E.4

Acquisition without operational merger.

Last sentence of the paragraph
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 06:58 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
1.E.4

Acquisition without operational merger.

Last sentence of the paragraph
Right, but then doesn’t 1.E.5 cover that?

5. The Company will not assign or allocate flying or aircraft to the carriers it controls for the purpose of securing contractual relief or concessions (i.e. no “whipsawing”).
Lincoln Osiris is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:03 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Right, but then doesn’t 1.E.5 cover that?

5. The Company will not assign or allocate flying or aircraft to the carriers it controls for the purpose of securing contractual relief or concessions (i.e. no “whipsawing”).
If that’s the case why does 1.E.4 exist?

Why does 1.E exist at all? If the company acquires another airline why should there be a single reason that they should not be operationally merged? There is no reason except to screw the pilots
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:14 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
If that’s the case why does 1.E.4 exist?

Why does 1.E exist at all? If the company acquires another airline why should there be a single reason that they should not be operationally merged? There is no reason except to screw the pilots
How would Spirit pilots get screwed if spirit decided to go out and buy another airline? 1.E.3 provides job security for us if that were to happen. Do you not think think the MEC and ALPA lawyers went over every single word in this? This stuff was not just pulled out of thin air. But as to why 1.E exsists at all? That would be a better question for an ALPA lawyer or at one of the road shows.
Lincoln Osiris is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:16 AM
  #156  
Saab Saab Phooey!
 
LoudFastRules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Set Hundo
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
It doesn’t have to say they can it has to say they cannot and it doesn’t. Assume you are our sleezy Management and you want to outsource the pilots when it suits you. Now read our section 1 both current and TA and ask yourself how you do it. I’m sure you can figure out a way.

You do remember that Bendo outsourced all of our airport personnel letterally overnight right? People in dtw, acy, myr that had decades with the company.

You do remember Bendo hired, trained, and staged scab mechanics at northwest prior to the mx strike?

Learn from history. They want contractors for everything so they can whipsaw them every year for the lowest price.
RE: Lessons from the past: Yes, NWA absolutely broke their Mechanics' union by training and staging hundreds of scab strike-breakers. But the real slime-icing on the scab-filled cake is that those scabs needed to be housed in hotels for weeks during their scab training. NWA racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in hotel fees with their scab army. When those bills came due, NWA declared BK and stiffed the hotels, giving them virtually nothing.

I didn't realize your guy was involved with that. Now your AIP makes more sense.
LoudFastRules is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:26 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
How would Spirit pilots get screwed if spirit decided to go out and buy another airline? 1.E.3 provides job security for us if that were to happen. Do you not think think the MEC and ALPA lawyers went over every single word in this? This stuff was not just pulled out of thin air. But as to why 1.E exsists at all? That would be a better question for an ALPA lawyer or at one of the road shows.
No good can come to the pilots from Spirit owning two SEPARATE airlines. None. Protecting your job at the time of the buy is one thing but I guarantee you that there is a shiit storm to follow that day. And the fact that buying a foreign or regional carrier releases them from all protection should be a red flag.

I think ALPA went through this and figured it was the best they could get with our mediator without a no vote. They wrote our current language and it’s worse so what’s that tell you.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:31 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by LoudFastRules
RE: Lessons from the past: Yes, NWA absolutely broke their Mechanics' union by training and staging hundreds of scab strike-breakers. But the real slime-icing on the scab-filled cake is that those scabs needed to be housed in hotels for weeks during their scab training. NWA racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in hotel fees with their scab army. When those bills came due, NWA declared BK and stiffed the hotels, giving them virtually nothing.

I didn't realize your guy was involved with that. Now your AIP makes more sense.
This guy is the antithesis of labor friendly. He tries to think of ways to screw hard working families to enrich himself.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:32 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: NK CA
Posts: 838
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
No good can come to the pilots from Spirit owning two SEPARATE airlines. None. Protecting your job at the time of the buy is one thing but I guarantee you that there is a shiit storm to follow that day. And the fact that buying a foreign or regional carrier releases them from all protection should be a red flag.

I think ALPA went through this and figured it was the best they could get with our mediator without a no vote. They wrote our current language and it’s worse so what’s that tell you.
Wait releases who from all protections? If they were to buy a foreign carrier we would still be covered under E 2 & 3.
Lincoln Osiris is offline  
Old 02-04-2018, 07:37 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Wait releases who from all protections? If they were to buy a foreign carrier we would still be covered under E 2 & 3.
Find an example where a company owning and operating two or more separate airlines has ended well for the pilots.

I come here to make money and nothing else. I was expecting the work rule concessions though not as bad. In exchange for them I expected industry standard pay not current Jetblue. I expected own occupation LTD. I expected DC retirement. we got it although the ratcheting up and 15%vs16% just to spite us infuriates me. I also expected rock solid scope with clear merger protections, codesharing restrictions, and outsourcing possibilities eliminated. This did not happen. It’s better than our current scope but tha doesn’t really matter if they exploit it. If they exploit one hole or twelve you’re still screwed and your contract means nothing.

If you made some financial decisions that mean you need this money yesterday go ahead and just vote yes. Scope will come home to roost one day I promise. Just a matter of when. I’d rather be negotiating it during this summers shiit storm than in 5+++ years.

Oh and no profit sharing.

No block or better on a leg by leg basis. That’s humorous right there
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
3
09-26-2012 04:21 PM
bulldog3
Foreign
1
06-20-2008 12:47 PM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
28
04-08-2007 08:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices